The “12 Day Warfare” between Israel and Iran is the height of a five-decade lengthy battle between a military-centric hierarchy of the Israeli state and the dispersed mosaic defence infrastructure of the Islamic Republic as a community state. Israel has been scoring a number of pyrrhic navy wins in opposition to Iran’s community of networks within the area over the past 12 months. But, whereas Israel’s degradation technique purchased the Jewish state respiration house, Iran’s community each inside and throughout the area stays intact. Iran will not be a state within the conventional sense, weak to top-down regime change or decapitation. It’s a mosaic community state – an adaptive, self-organizing, and ideologically resilient construction that has confirmed to have the ability to soak up exterior shocks with out collapsing. Israel’s marketing campaign, its most direct and expansive confrontation with Iran up to now, demonstrated the boundaries of typical state-on-state warfare in opposition to a community state. Degrading the Islamic Republic’s broader regional community, consisting itself of networked non-state actors, is not going to result in swift victories however is a long-drawn strategy of degradation that might require the mobilization of a counter-network.
Iran has lengthy moved past the inflexible buildings of bureaucratic hierarchy. Its governance and regional affect function by way of what community theorists name an “all-channel heterarchy”—a decentralized however interconnected system of nodes. Domestically this community revolves across the Supreme Chief who embodies the ideological and institutional anchor of a decentralized community of various parallel establishments of governance and statecraft. The Islamic Republic can due to this fact be outlined as a community state Iran as a result of it generates energy not solely by way of conventional navy or bureaucratic hierarchies, however by way of a dispersed net of surrogate forces, competing authority centres, networks of corporations and monetary flows that function throughout the boundaries of conventional state sovereignty and territoriality.
A key department of that community state are the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) a networked, parallel safety equipment directing offensive surrogate networks throughout the so-called ‘Axis of Resistance’ from Lebanon, over Syria and Iraq to Yemen; but in addition comprising a bottom-up community of socio-cultural militias and activists – the Basij – attempting to tie common Iranians into the system of the Islamic Republic. Greater than that, the IRGC instructions a worldwide empire of monetary and enterprise networks, which features because the value-chain that financially and materially underwrites the ‘Axis of Resistance’.
One other department of that community is the clerical institution that sustains the theocratic legitimacy of the regime. It features because the ideological engine of the Islamic Republic weaving the ideational thread by way of regional Shia networks in an try to attach them to the general narrative of the Islamic Revolution. Then there are the bonyads – multi-billion-dollar charitable trusts which have developed into rent-seeking patrimonial networks solely accountable to the Supreme Chief.
All of those networks exist in parallel to the formal bureaucratic establishments of the state, comparable to the federal government, the assorted ministries and the formal safety sector. The regime’s networks – cautious of the specter of a secular safety sector with a monopoly over violence – have lengthy constructed its strategic defence round religio-militant surrogate networks within the area: the ‘Axis of Resistance’. The notion of mosaic defence suggests {that a} decentralized community of militants spanning all the area can’t be simply defeated by enemies with superior firepower comparable to the USA or Israel. Every surrogate acts semi-autonomously, however stays related by shared ideology, narrative coherence, and a strategic imaginative and prescient nonetheless dominated by Tehran.
These networks have advanced from conventional patron-client dynamics to strategic partnerships. They provide native governance, navy power, and ideological affect. The IRGC, functioning as a central hub, connects with every node by way of an internet of ideological, logistical, and monetary ties. Nonetheless, these hyperlinks are usually not unidirectional. The community inside and the community with out are designed for resilience: if one hub or node is degraded, others can compensate.
On the coronary heart of this heterarchy is a compelling narrative: Islamic resistance in opposition to overseas domination and oppression. It’s this consensual, ideological glue – not strict command-and-control – that sustains the community each inside and with out. This narrative initially resonated properly throughout the dissident camps that triggered the resistance in opposition to the Shah within the Seventies. The revolution of 1979 was extensively borne by widespread help, which was sustained by way of the traumatic Iraq-Iran Warfare within the Nineteen Eighties the place a weak post-revolutionary regime wanted to rally Iranians across the flag. But, many years of coup proofing, repression, corruption and ideological reactionism have step by step undermined the mobilization energy of the regime.
Much less so on the regional stage. Right here – additionally pushed by Israel’s disruption of its provide chains – the ‘Axis of Resistance’ has developed into an ever looser community that’s not simply sustained by materials, monetary and navy help from Iran however by the narrative of resistance – largely directed in opposition to Israel and US overseas and safety coverage. The narrative units the agenda, imaginative and prescient and function of an more and more horizontal community that ever much less requires Iran because the central hub to perform. From the start Hezbollah, Iraqi militias and the Houthis have been in a position to depend on a strategic type of decentralized mission command. They’ve retained autonomy and company to plan and execute actions as they see match. Like strategic swarms, nodes act independently however in alignment. As a substitute of concentrating effort, the ‘Axis’ disperses actions throughout a mess of domains, involving a variety of various actors, who execute actions seemingly coherently with massive levels of autonomy, which taken collectively morphs into one – similar to a swarm of birds.
Israel in the meantime has realized classes of methods to interact the community when it struck Hezbollah in 2024. Rising from the de-centralized ‘pager assault’ in opposition to Hezbollah operatives, is a doctrine of degradation by way of deep intelligence penetration and simultaneous kinetic strikes. The objective was to map the Iranian community, determine interdependent vulnerabilities, and strike a number of nodes directly. This was not a decapitation strike – it was an try to paralyze the community by way of systemic shock.
Initially, the outcomes have been hanging. Key strategic and operational Hezbollah commanders have been killed. Provide chain hubs have been destroyed and features of communication disrupted. The strategic assassination of its charismatic chief Hassan Nasrallah dealt the ultimate blow that might result in strategic paralysis. It was sufficient to redraw the boundaries of deterrence. Nonetheless, Hezbollah stays intact as a community and a potent preventing power.
Israel tried the identical in opposition to Iran. A community of intelligence operatives had setup an intricately orchestrated and decentralized operation in opposition to key IRGC commanders and features of communication. Along with large air strikes, Israel was initially in a position to ship strategic shock to the community system. However inside days, the system started to bounce again. Management reconstituted from second-tier commanders. Communications though disrupted didn’t undermine the de-centralized mosaic defence community. The assorted nodes acted upon initiative. Air defences though hopelessly overwhelmed by the technologically superior enemy have been in a position to mobilize. Ballistic missiles have been launched efficiently inflicting havoc in Israeli cities.
What remained largely invisible in the course of the 12-day warfare, nevertheless, was the ‘Axis of Resistance’. The assorted surrogates confirmed that Israel’s degradation since 2023 remodeled the community right into a looser, horizontal axis primarily serving native pursuits quite sacrificing themselves for Iran’s survival. Crucially for Israel, no less than for the second Hezbollah doesn’t help the Islamic Republic by re-opening the Lebanese entrance.
Even resilient networks can fracture from inside. The best menace to Iran’s networked system lies in a breakdown between its personal nodes—notably between the IRGC and the clerical institution. Because the IRGC’s financial and political affect has grown, so has its autonomy. If the ideological alignment between the Guards and the clerical elite erodes, the community might start to splinter. The identical is true on the societal stage. The system is much less and fewer resilient to soak up rising numbers of disenfranchised and alienated Iranians. The resistance narrative not resonates throughout Iran, eroding the foundations of the community state that has been deeply embedded into the favored material of Iran in 1979. If native nodes start questioning the central narrative, they could search larger autonomy and even defect from the system.
In community principle, when the ideological or strategic glue binding nodes decays, the system turns into weak to fission – even with out exterior strain. Because the community consists of dispersed actors and decentralized actions solely a grand strategic narrative offers the aim on the meta stage that creates the symbiotic impact that’s bigger than the sum of its elements. Israel’s navy strategy – based mostly on sequential system degradation– is strategically mismatched to Iran’s mosaic community. A networked adversary can’t be defeated by linear strategies. It might probably solely be challenged by a rival community: one that gives a compelling counternarrative, is ready to mobilize, and mirrors the adaptive, distributed construction of its opponent. No such rival community presently exists.
Since 2009 the simmering revolution has triggered natural mobilization in opposition to the regime. However with out a systemic group, a transparent narrative and an inclusively interesting, charismatic management, the extremely divided protest motion fails to compete with a well-organized community of repression the regime has constructed. Till a counter-network emerges that’s ideologically credible, domestically embedded, and strategically coordinated, the Islamic Republic’s community will endure – even when underneath a altering grand-strategic outlook. Iran has constructed a system designed to not win shortly, however to outlive indefinitely. It isn’t a command-and-control state however a strategic net – onerous to map, more durable to interrupt. The June 2025 warfare demonstrated that whereas Israel can strike onerous and deep, it can not but dislocate the system. Iran’s resilience will not be unintentional. It’s by design. And in a area more and more formed by networks, not states, the Islamic Republic can seemingly solely be remodeled from throughout the community itself.
Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations
