Seems even essentially the most delusional, far-left Hollywood darlings will be proper twice a day.
(Sure, I do know that adage applies to a damaged clock, however evaluating a busted timepiece to actress Jamie Lee Curtis is an insult to the damaged clock.)
Now, in full equity, maybe this author is being a bit harsh.
Certain, Curtis is completely stricken with Trump Derangement Syndrome, and sure, she brazenly flaunts her baby affected by gender dysphoria.
However, to her infinitesimal credit score, regardless of the TDS and card-carrying membership within the LGBT mafia, Curtis is, the truth is, an precise human being with a soul.
That will not look like an particularly excessive bar to hurdle, however if you happen to’ve been paying any consideration to the leftist response to the latest assassination of Turning Level USA founder Charlie Kirk, you realize that it’s a bar that swathes of America can’t appear to clear.
Nonetheless, Curtis did, and — once more, to her credit score — she did so by mentioning one of the crucial essential issues to Kirk and his legacy: religion.
In line with Fox Information, Curtis appeared on a podcast Monday and spoke about a variety of subjects. A kind of subjects included the lately deceased Kirk.
And whereas many really feel the necessity to eulogize Kirk with a “however,” Curtis did no such factor.
She as a substitute brazenly wept and broke down on the thought of a 31-year-old father and husband being violently killed in entrance of his spouse and children. — a regular response to such a tragedy.
You’ll be able to hear the related alternate, courtesy of Trending Politics co-owner Collin Rugg, beneath:
Actress and movie producer Jamie Lee Curtis breaks down in tears over the dying of Charlie Kirk.
“I imply, I disagreed with him on nearly each level I ever heard him say…”
“However I imagine he was a person of religion, and I hope in that second when he died, that he felt linked to… pic.twitter.com/Bhv2UZrMhU
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 16, 2025
The bit (it’s not totally captured) begins with Curtis erroneously referring to Kirk as “Charlie Crist.”
“I’m sorry,” Curtis mentioned after being corrected by podcast host Marc Maron. “Kirk. I simply referred to as him Crist. I believe due to Christ. Due to his deep, deep perception.
“I imply, I disagreed with him on nearly each level I ever heard him say, however I imagine he was a person of religion.”
It’s at this level that Curtis may barely comprise her feelings, as her voice quivered with sorrow as she continued to debate Kirk.
“And I hope in that second when he died, he felt linked to his religion, despite the fact that I discover what he … His concepts have been abhorrent to me, I nonetheless imagine he was a father, a husband, and a person of religion, and I hope no matter connection to God means, that he felt it.”
Curtis would ultimately pivot to discussing 9/11 and the way Individuals are simply continually “bombarded” with harmful imagery, however her level — and response — to Kirk’s assassination was clear: No matter it’s possible you’ll consider Charlie Kirk, on the very least, no person deserves to lose their life in the way in which Kirk did.
Once more, credit score the place it’s due, Curtis’ response — “his concepts have been abhorrent” apart — is what many on the suitable anticipated to see out of the left when Kirk was murdered in chilly blood.
As an alternative, we obtained individuals actually dancing on his grave and making up quotes wholesale to denigrate a deceased man’s beliefs.
So I posit this to Ms. Curtis within the off likelihood she ever sees this: Check out your fellow leftists celebrating his dying. Check out your individual religion.
Is it actually Charlie Kirk’s biblical beliefs which might be “abhorrent”? Or is it the individuals with whom you encompass your self?
This text appeared initially on The Western Journal.
