Studying Time: 4 minutes
Because it seems, the Blake Vigorous-Justin Baldoni authorized saga really can get crazier.
And it’s all due to Taylor Swift.
The actress and the singer have been shut buddies for years, in fact, however that friendship has been in an surprising highlight over the previous few months resulting from Vigorous ongoing lawsuit battle with It Ends With Us co-star Baldoni.
(Vigorous has accused Baldoni of sexual harassment on the set of that film, whereas Baldoni has countered with documentation that claims Vigorous, her husband Ryan Reynolds and their publicity crew conspired to defame and extort him.)
Reduce to Might 14 and a brand new twist on this authorized battle.
5 days after Swift was subpoenaed to testify within the upcoming trial between Vigorous and Baldoni — as a result of the latter alleges that the artist was current for a gathering on the former’s penthouse, throughout which Baldoni felt pressured to simply accept sure script modifications — Baldoni’s lawyer stated that Vigorous “demanded that Ms. Swift launch a press release of help for Ms. Vigorous.”
On this new court docket submitting, Baldoni’s lawyer cites a “supply who is very more likely to have dependable info” and this info facilities on Vigorous having requested Swift to delete textual content message associated, we presume, to Baldoni’s case in opposition to the film star.
One other allegation included within the letter?
That Vigorous’s lawyer contacted Swift’s lawyer “and demanded that Ms. Swift launch a press release of help for Ms. Vigorous” — whereas additionally “intimating that if Ms. Swift refused to take action, personal textual content messages of a private nature in Ms. Vigorous’s possession could be launched.”
Sure, it is a approach of alleging that Blake Vigorous has tried to blackmail Taylor Swift with the general public unveiling of seemingly embarrassing textual content messages if Swift does NOT come out to the world and help her good friend.
In a scathing response, Vigorous lawyer Michael Gottlieb slammed the accusation on Wednesday as “categorically false” and “cowardly sourced to supposed nameless sources, and utterly untethered from actuality.”
He continued:
“That is what we’ve come to anticipate from the Wayfarer events’ legal professionals, who seem to like nothing greater than taking pictures first, with none proof, and with no take care of the folks they’re harming within the course of.
“We are going to imminently file motions with the court docket to carry these attorneys accountable for his or her misconduct right here.”
Vigorous’s camp went on to file a letter of its personal to Decide Liman, asking for Baldoni’s aforementioned accusation to be struck from the file.
“On behalf of our shopper, Blake Vigorous, we respectfully transfer to strike the letter signed by Mr. Bryan Freedman and filed earlier as we speak,” reads this official be aware.
“That letter, which was not filed with any evidentiary help of any variety, a lot much less something beneath oath, falsely accuses Ms. Vigorous, and her counsel, of participating in ‘witness tampering and proof spoliation’ based mostly on an undisclosed nameless supply.
“It ought to be pointless to reply to anonymously sourced, baseless, allegations recklessly leveled with none supporting proof. It’s value stating for the file, nonetheless, that every of the allegations within the Freedman Letter is unequivocally and demonstrably false.
“As a authorized matter, the Freedman Letter is improper. It doesn’t search any type of reduction, is irrelevant to any movement presently pending earlier than the Courtroom, and serves no reliable objective. It’s not helpful to the Courtroom the least bit.”
From what we’ve heard, Vigorous’s relationship with Swift has been impacted by these back-and-forth lawsuits and allegations.
Again in January, as par tof Baldoni’s defamation lawsuit, the actor included texts between Vigorous and Baldoni wherein Vigorous seems to confer with Swift as “one in all her dragons.”
Therefore why his authorized crew is attempting to pull the wildly widespread into this authorized mess.
After information broke of the subpoena, a consultant for Swift denied any involvement in Vigorous and Baldoni’s movie It Ends with Us, from which the litigation between them has stemmed.
This assertion reads as follows:
“Taylor Swift by no means set foot on the set of this film, she was not concerned in any casting or inventive selections, she didn’t rating the movie, she by no means noticed an edit or made any notes on the movie, she didn’t even see ‘It Ends With Us’ till weeks after its public launch, and was touring across the globe throughout 2023 and 2024 headlining the most important tour in historical past.
“On condition that her involvement was licensing a track for the movie, which 19 different artists additionally did, this doc subpoena is designed to make use of Taylor Swift’s title to attract public curiosity by creating tabloid clickbait as an alternative of specializing in the information of the case.”
Studying Time: 4 minutes
Because it seems, the Blake Vigorous-Justin Baldoni authorized saga really can get crazier.
And it’s all due to Taylor Swift.
The actress and the singer have been shut buddies for years, in fact, however that friendship has been in an surprising highlight over the previous few months resulting from Vigorous ongoing lawsuit battle with It Ends With Us co-star Baldoni.
(Vigorous has accused Baldoni of sexual harassment on the set of that film, whereas Baldoni has countered with documentation that claims Vigorous, her husband Ryan Reynolds and their publicity crew conspired to defame and extort him.)
Reduce to Might 14 and a brand new twist on this authorized battle.
5 days after Swift was subpoenaed to testify within the upcoming trial between Vigorous and Baldoni — as a result of the latter alleges that the artist was current for a gathering on the former’s penthouse, throughout which Baldoni felt pressured to simply accept sure script modifications — Baldoni’s lawyer stated that Vigorous “demanded that Ms. Swift launch a press release of help for Ms. Vigorous.”
On this new court docket submitting, Baldoni’s lawyer cites a “supply who is very more likely to have dependable info” and this info facilities on Vigorous having requested Swift to delete textual content message associated, we presume, to Baldoni’s case in opposition to the film star.
One other allegation included within the letter?
That Vigorous’s lawyer contacted Swift’s lawyer “and demanded that Ms. Swift launch a press release of help for Ms. Vigorous” — whereas additionally “intimating that if Ms. Swift refused to take action, personal textual content messages of a private nature in Ms. Vigorous’s possession could be launched.”
Sure, it is a approach of alleging that Blake Vigorous has tried to blackmail Taylor Swift with the general public unveiling of seemingly embarrassing textual content messages if Swift does NOT come out to the world and help her good friend.
In a scathing response, Vigorous lawyer Michael Gottlieb slammed the accusation on Wednesday as “categorically false” and “cowardly sourced to supposed nameless sources, and utterly untethered from actuality.”
He continued:
“That is what we’ve come to anticipate from the Wayfarer events’ legal professionals, who seem to like nothing greater than taking pictures first, with none proof, and with no take care of the folks they’re harming within the course of.
“We are going to imminently file motions with the court docket to carry these attorneys accountable for his or her misconduct right here.”
Vigorous’s camp went on to file a letter of its personal to Decide Liman, asking for Baldoni’s aforementioned accusation to be struck from the file.
“On behalf of our shopper, Blake Vigorous, we respectfully transfer to strike the letter signed by Mr. Bryan Freedman and filed earlier as we speak,” reads this official be aware.
“That letter, which was not filed with any evidentiary help of any variety, a lot much less something beneath oath, falsely accuses Ms. Vigorous, and her counsel, of participating in ‘witness tampering and proof spoliation’ based mostly on an undisclosed nameless supply.
“It ought to be pointless to reply to anonymously sourced, baseless, allegations recklessly leveled with none supporting proof. It’s value stating for the file, nonetheless, that every of the allegations within the Freedman Letter is unequivocally and demonstrably false.
“As a authorized matter, the Freedman Letter is improper. It doesn’t search any type of reduction, is irrelevant to any movement presently pending earlier than the Courtroom, and serves no reliable objective. It’s not helpful to the Courtroom the least bit.”
From what we’ve heard, Vigorous’s relationship with Swift has been impacted by these back-and-forth lawsuits and allegations.
Again in January, as par tof Baldoni’s defamation lawsuit, the actor included texts between Vigorous and Baldoni wherein Vigorous seems to confer with Swift as “one in all her dragons.”
Therefore why his authorized crew is attempting to pull the wildly widespread into this authorized mess.
After information broke of the subpoena, a consultant for Swift denied any involvement in Vigorous and Baldoni’s movie It Ends with Us, from which the litigation between them has stemmed.
This assertion reads as follows:
“Taylor Swift by no means set foot on the set of this film, she was not concerned in any casting or inventive selections, she didn’t rating the movie, she by no means noticed an edit or made any notes on the movie, she didn’t even see ‘It Ends With Us’ till weeks after its public launch, and was touring across the globe throughout 2023 and 2024 headlining the most important tour in historical past.
“On condition that her involvement was licensing a track for the movie, which 19 different artists additionally did, this doc subpoena is designed to make use of Taylor Swift’s title to attract public curiosity by creating tabloid clickbait as an alternative of specializing in the information of the case.”
