Signed in 2024, the Ethiopia-Somaliland Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) has reshaped regional dynamics, probably granting Ethiopia sea entry by way of Berbera in alternate for Somaliland’s recognition. This transfer challenged Somalia’s territorial integrity and prompted Mogadishu to align itself with Egypt, Eritrea, and Djibouti towards Ethiopia. Whereas the disaster displays Ethiopia’s strategic push for a maritime presence, it additionally captures Somaliland’s long-standing quest for independence. Within the wider Crimson Sea area, regional tensions are exacerbated by extra-regional actors which embody the UAE, Turkey, France, and Saudi Arabia, all of which have their very own pursuits therein. Though, exterior actors don’t instantly trigger battle, their involvement emboldens native actors and escalates rivalries. Therefore, the Crimson Sea area has a rising significance in modern world geopolitics.
Ethiopia-Somaliland MoU: Geopolitical Ambitions and the Quest for Recognition
The 12 months 2024 started with the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding between Ethiopia and Somaliland. The latter, previously British Somaliland, was a part of Somalia, from which it unilaterally seceded after Siad Barre’s regime collapsed in 1991. Since then, Somaliland has been self-ruled and is taken into account a de facto state. Nevertheless, the Hargheisa authority doesn’t take pleasure in any worldwide authorized recognition. If carried out, the settlement with Addis Ababa would give Somaliland its first vital de jure recognition. In return, the Hargheisa authorities would grant Ethiopia entry to the ocean via the port of Berbera and the concession of a coastal space for navy use. The scenario revolves round three key regional gamers: Ethiopia, Somalia, and Somaliland. Every of those actors has engaged in actions pushed by its personal targets and strategic priorities.
Ethiopia’s determination is influenced by a number of sensible financial and strategic components. Following the Eritrean Warfare within the early Nineteen Nineties, Ethiopia misplaced its Crimson Sea ports and have become the world’s most populous landlocked nation. Since 1998, Djibouti’s ports have dealt with 95 per cent of commerce to and from Addis Ababa. Sea entry via Djibouti prices Ethiopia between $1.5 and $2 billion yearly which Ethiopia’s rulers, since 2019, begun to precise extra strongly that they think about this spending extreme and unsustainable within the medium to long run. To scale back Addis Ababa’s dependence on Djiboutian ports, the federal government of Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed believes it’s essential to discover a viable various. Earlier than the MoU, Ethiopia had thought of a number of options to Djibouti, together with Eritrea, Somalia, and Kenya. The concept of creating an financial and commerce hall between Addis Ababa and the port of Berbera on the Gulf of Aden started to take form within the remaining months of 2023. Somaliland’s predominant port has been operated by the Emirati firm – DP World since 2015, which has developed its infrastructure and elevated its cargo transit capability.
Ethiopia estimates that it might divert between 12 and 15 per cent of the overall quantity passing via Djibouti’s ports to Berbera and, in the long run, join its industrial zones to a number of commerce corridors. From a strategic standpoint, Ethiopian assessments are influenced by Addis Ababa’s nationwide position conception. Ethiopia sees itself because the main regional energy due to its historical past and conventional financial and political weight within the area. Consequently, Ethiopian elites understand the Crimson Sea and the Gulf of Aden as their pure strategic spheres. For that reason, the Ethiopian Institute of Overseas Affairs lately introduced the ‘Grand Technique of the Two Waters.’ The brand new agenda goals to increase the sphere of nationwide curiosity and motion eastwards in direction of the ocean, in contrast to up to now when the main focus of Ethiopia’s strategic projection was primarily on the Nile Basin. Certainly, Ethiopia’s ambitions as a regional energy are challenged by its lack of a maritime gateway. For Addis Ababa, having a presence within the Crimson Sea would offer two strategic advantages: first, it might strengthen its standing within the area; second, it might bolster Ethiopia’s worldwide position by enhancing cooperation in multilateral anti-piracy efforts. Briefly, the Ethiopian authorities sees maritime projection as a strategic useful resource and a gateway to the geopolitics of the approaching many years, which is able to concentrate on Asia and the Indo-Pacific particularly. Subsequently, one of many key clauses of the MoU permits Ethiopia to determine a navy outpost in Lughaya, a city overlooking the Gulf of Aden, for at the least fifty years. In accordance with Ethiopian plans, the naval base will grow to be the headquarters of the nascent Ethiopian navy.
For Somaliland, the MoU represents an additional step on the troublesome path to independence. Prior to now 12 months, the problem of Somaliland’s independence has gained renewed consideration and relevance. This pursuit of self-determination is deeply rooted in a historic context that stretches again to the nineteenth century, predating the regime of Siad Barre. The Somalilanders’ path started throughout a pivotal time when the British Empire established agreements with varied Somali clans, significantly the Gadabuursi, Issa, and Habr Awal. In 1884, the area was formally designated as British Somaliland, a protectorate that loved a measure of autonomy and governance, distinguishing it from the colonial dominance exerted by Italian authorities in southern Somalia. Following the unification of Somaliland with the Belief Territory of Somalia in 1960, the social, financial, and political situations of the individuals of Somaliland started to deteriorate, resulting in widespread discontent and a powerful want for independence. Over time, the Siad Barre regime forged an extended shadow over Somaliland, resulting in widespread discrimination and marginalisation. The political and financial machinations of the central authorities usually uncared for the aspirations of the Somaliland individuals, fuelling a rising sense of injustice. On this context, collective reminiscence grew to become a strong cornerstone of identification, highlighting the stark contrasts between Somaliland’s struggles and Somalia’s divergent trajectories within the turbulent post-Siad Barre period.
Hargheisa’s quest for independence is rooted in historic grievances and displays the distinctive identities and trajectories of its individuals. The Somaliland narrative usually attracts comparisons with the present scenario in the remainder of Somalia. Over the previous three many years, this de facto state has made vital progress in direction of sustainable institutional and administrative improvement albeit on a really restricted funds. The democratisation course of can also be essential to additional the event of Somaliland’s independence. The current nationwide elections held final November demonstrated the political maturity of all events concerned. The peaceable switch of energy from the defeated authorities to the electoral course of is a outstanding occasion within the area and stands out as one of many few such cases within the continent. The achievements of the institution-building course of in Somaliland are much more placing when in comparison with the trail taken by Somalia.
Somalia’s Diplomatic Counterbalance and the Emergence of an Anti-Ethiopian Bloc
The signing of the MoU by Ethiopia and Somaliland raised considerations amongst regional actors, significantly Somalia. As Somaliland is formally and legally recognised as an integral a part of Somalia, there have been fears that Hargeisa’s claims to independence have been gaining momentum. Mogadishu was significantly involved that Ethiopia’s official recognition of Somaliland’s claims might set off a domino impact, main different regional and extra-regional actors to comply with swimsuit. Subsequently, Somalia noticed Ethiopia’s actions as a deliberate act of intimidation that threatened its territorial integrity at a delicate time for its political future. Somalia faces a number of challenges, together with the wrestle to determine an efficient institutional framework, significantly with regard to the connection between the central authorities and the federal states, and in addition the battle towards the terrorist group – al-Shabaab.
In response to the MoU, the Somali govt, led by President Hassan Sheikh Mahmoud, launched an intense diplomatic marketing campaign to stop its implementation and recognition by the worldwide neighborhood. Somalia has sought assist from regional organisations such because the Intergovernmental Authority on Improvement (IGAD), the East African Neighborhood (EAC), and the African Union (AU). In doing so, Somalia has consolidated alliances with each regional and extra-regional actors. In consequence, the dynamics between these three actors – Somalia, Ethiopia, and Somaliland have grow to be more and more intertwined. Mogadishu’s pure anti-Ethiopian companions are two of Addis Ababa’s historic rivals: Eritrea and Egypt.
In comparison with 2018, the 12 months of normalisation between Ethiopia and Eritrea, the scenario right this moment may be very totally different. The positions of Eritrean President Isaias Afwerki and Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed rapidly diverged following the signing of the Pretoria Settlement (2022), which ended the two-year battle in Tigray. Eritrea, which had supported the Ethiopian navy marketing campaign, refused to barter with the Tigrayan authorities, represented by the Tigrayan Individuals’s Liberation Entrance (TPLF). The space between the 2 leaders has widened as Ethiopia’s claims to the ocean have grown. Certainly, Asmara fears that Ethiopia is eyeing its ports, a concern fuelled by the rhetoric of Abiy and different Ethiopian leaders. Conversely, Isaias has used his management and lots of regional relationships to foster a type of ‘anti-Ethiopian coalition’. One vital change has been Egypt’s rising involvement within the area.
Mogadishu’s rapprochement with Cairo was formalised in August 2024 with the signing of a defence settlement. This settlement centres on Egypt’s intention to assist Somalia’s request for the withdrawal of all Ethiopian troops presently stationed in Somalia as a part of the African Union peacekeeping mission (previously generally known as Atmis, changed by the Aussom mission on 1 January 2025). The strengthening of Somali-Egyptian relations, supported by Asmara and involving Djibouti via a safety cooperation settlement, has consolidated an anti-Ethiopian bloc. This alignment represents a vital shift within the regional steadiness and illustrates Egypt’s altering Africa coverage. Since 2020, Egypt has reaffirmed the significance of its southern relations. President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi has progressively reassessed Egypt’s African relations and promoted a geopolitical technique that emphasises a north-south axis, reasonably than the east-west axis that dominated in earlier many years. The Crimson Sea area, together with the Nile Basin, is now a key a part of this new strategic framework, which is formed by Egypt’s historic rivalry with Ethiopia. Between the 2 states, the steadiness on the Nile has modified. The development of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) has given Ethiopia a strategic benefit over Egypt. Egypt due to this fact needed to adapt its strategy to the continuing dynamics by deciding to increase the areas of rivalry towards the ocean. Tensions between Ethiopia and Somalia due to this fact supplied a chance to extend Egypt’s footprint within the area.
Regional Tensions and Further-regional Actors within the Crimson Sea
The MoU signed by Ethiopia and Somaliland has opened a brand new part in tensions. The main focus of regional tensions is shifting to the coastal areas, significantly the Crimson Sea and the Gulf of Aden, that are marked by a lot of safety and defence agreements. Frequent strategic pursuits underpin the alignment of the anti-Ethiopian bloc, which incorporates Somalia, Djibouti, Eritrea, and Egypt. Somalia views any authorized recognition of Somaliland’s independence as an existential menace. For Djibouti, the financial injury from elevated commerce via Berbera is marginal however probably devastating to its fragile inner steadiness of energy. Eritrea perceives Ethiopia as an ongoing menace, and the present Ethiopian authorities is seen by Asmara as extremely unreliable, elevating considerations a few potential escalation of violence alongside their shared borders. Lastly, for Egypt, the evaluation of its regional place is of explicit significance. Historically, Cairo has regarded the waters between Suez and Aden as its ‘lake’. In consequence, like Addis Ababa, it regards your entire area as a part of its sphere of affect. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Turkey are among the many most energetic gamers within the area. The UAE has supported the MoU to capitalise on investments in Berbera and Addis Ababa. Turkey, alternatively, has taken a extra balanced strategy, due to its robust political and business ties with Ethiopia and Somalia. For Ankara, nonetheless, Somalia’s integrity should not be questioned. Following their rapprochement in 2021, the UAE and Turkey have maintained good relations. Regardless of their totally different methods and a few disagreements, each nations share a typical curiosity in sustaining a central position in regional affairs. Different extra-regional gamers, comparable to France and Saudi Arabia, are additionally energetic within the background.
France helps the MoU as a part of its ongoing efforts to extend its presence in East Africa, which started similtaneously its withdrawal from the Sahel area. Its base in Djibouti is destined to grow to be extra central to French coverage as French navy presence in West Africa is being lowered. French officers see this elevated affect in regional affairs as important to France’s future pursuits within the Indo-Pacific area. In the meantime, Saudi Arabia, whose geopolitical focus is shifting from the Gulf to the Crimson Sea, opposes the implementation of the settlement between Ethiopia and Somaliland. It seeks to counter regional tasks promoted by the UAE. This could be because of the long-standing political rift between the 2 Gulf monarchies.
Further-regional actors don’t instantly trigger a rise in regional conflicts. Reasonably, it’s native actors who, feeling empowered by their connections with these extra-regional companions, understand their atmosphere as extra permissive and acquire the boldness to take assertive actions that they might not have thought of earlier than. Understanding these dynamics sheds gentle on why Ethiopia and Somaliland determined to signal the MoU at this historic second. This angle additionally helps to elucidate different regional crises, such because the civil battle in Sudan and the battle in Tigray. The totally different transformations within the worldwide system have created a context wherein native actors can search a number of types of exterior assist. Elevated alignment and overlap between native and regional rivalries has elevated the willingness of actors to take assertive motion, resulting in a basic improve in inter- and intra-state tensions. Nevertheless, the versatile nature of alliances may mitigate the chance of the trickle-down impact that usually accompanies such alliances.
Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations
