To cancel or to not cancel.
That is the conundrum that Canada’s new prime minister, Mark Carney, confronts whereas poised to name a federal election that can possible be outlined by and fought over one query: Who do Canadians belief to tackle a bully American president intent on turning a sovereign nation into, formally, a US state?
Past the tit-for-tat tariffs being imposed in what threatens to be an escalating and punitive commerce conflict between Canada and the USA, one other prickly flashpoint has emerged.
It constitutes the primary “check” of Carney’s promised dedication to weaning the nation he hopes to guide for years, not weeks, from its lengthy, ingrained dependence on a dominant southern neighbour.
Carney is being pressed by often disparate and antagonistic forces alongside Canada’s slim political spectrum to desert the rest of a $19bn deal – engineered belatedly by his predecessor, Justin Trudeau – to purchase an extra 62 US-made and maintained F-35 fighter jets.
Canada has already paid for 16 warplanes, that are because of be delivered by early subsequent yr.
Conservative pundits writing for conservative newspapers have joined former Liberal international minister, Lloyd Axworthy, and peace and disarmament teams in urging the prime minister to “stand as much as” America’s mercurial commander-in-chief, Donald Trump.
To wit, they’re demanding Carney comply with Portugal’s lead and axe the deliberate buy of the additional technically troubled jets as a tangible expression of Canada’s rejection of Trump’s imperial designs, in addition to a stinging monetary and diplomatic defence of the besieged confederation’s autonomy.
Axworthy advised a tv interviewer just lately that it will “be a mistake to proceed” with the acquisition of F-35 jets.
As a substitute, he argued, Canada ought to “push again” towards a belligerent president who has “kicked us within the enamel”.
“I feel this is a chance for us to say,” Axworthy instructed. “Can we … need our navy so entangled with the American navy that our discretion and independence of motion are restricted?”
It’s odd that, in 2025, Axworthy would problem Canada to embrace the “alternative” to distance itself from the US militarily when a succession of Liberal and Conservative prime ministers has, from 1945 on, fused the continental “junior companion’s” armed forces to the Pentagon’s sprawling defence infrastructure like conjoined twins.
In any occasion, a immediately liberated Axworthy additionally identified that the “digital field” housing the working software program for the warplanes is managed by the large US arms producer, Lockheed Martin.
The worry is {that a} vindictive Trump might order the aerospace and “defence” contractor to disclaim Canada entry to any software program upgrades that might allow the jets’ deadly capabilities in flight.
These appeals, anchored as they’re in guarding the Maple Leaf and all of the feelings Canada’s distinctive purple and white nationwide flag conjures up, have struck a nationalistic chord with many Canadians who’ve been seized by a “purchase home-made” motion that’s gathering enthusiasm and momentum.
Carney, the previous central banker turned politician, has been obliged, after all, to reply to the prevailing patriotic winds within the hopes that they propel him and the Liberal Occasion to victory.
So, it was hardly stunning when Defence Minister Invoice Blair introduced late final week that Ottawa would “re-examine” its contract with Lockheed Martin and search for European options to the F-35 jets.
The “assessment” of the prevailing deal has allowed Carney to assert the “Canada first” floor and has afforded him time to think about the potential implications and penalties of cancelling it outright.
On the threat of offending loyal readers and startling my simply agitated detractors, I feel Carney’s predictable, carve-out-some-convenient-time gambit is, in gentle of the unsure geopolitical circumstances, the prudent factor to do.
Let me share two different observations that should present some helpful context for the prescriptions I’m about to supply Carney on how he ought to deal with this delicate and probably flamable cross-border dispute.
First, if I had my druthers, I might forgo buying warplanes that, in a era or so, will develop into out of date, and spend the mountain of cash enhancing younger Canadians’ fast-fading prospects of shopping for a house on the not-so-distant horizon and burnishing the paltry pension that seniors obtain each month.
However I do know that any future Liberal or Conservative authorities shall be devoted – as institutional gospel – to changing Canada’s ageing roster of CF-18 fighter jets.
The query now, in gentle of Trump’s oafish and disrespectful threats, is whose identify shall be on the massive cheque to provide these warplanes?
Second, I doubt that Carney and his pared-down cupboard are going to be swayed by my recommendation – in the event that they learn it in any respect. The Financial institution of Canada’s ex-chairman has spent a lot of his profession tuning out the loud, typically ill-informed noise, produced by members of the know-it-all commentariat, together with me.
Nonetheless, since that is an “opinion” column, right here is my view of how Carney should navigate the fraught quandary he faces.
I imagine that Carney – and by extension, Canada – ought to maintain our precious chips shut by fairly than going all in.
Trump could take pleasure in a powerful hand, however, regardless of his bluster and bravado, he’s a foul poker participant – inclined to creating short-sighted and impulsive bets that do extra injury than good to US pursuits.
Carney should be affected person and exploit the lengthy recreation to his benefit by utilizing the pending F-35 procurement as leverage throughout rancorous tariff negotiations that would effectively prevail all through Trump’s chaotic, four-year time period as president.
As a crucial corollary, Carney must rebuff myopic writers and historians demanding that he nix, forthwith, the F-35s in favour of the Swedish-built Saab Gripen to mollify his chirping critics inside and outdoors Parliament and editorial boards extra serious about “decisive” acts than calm rejoinders.
Given Trump’s coercive modus operandi and impetuous nature, there are not any ensures that this extra cautious strategy shall be persuasive or dampen the president’s retributive instincts.
It’s value a strive. And, to bolster the possibilities of success, it must be coupled with a deliberate and sustained effort to tamp down the chest-thumping rhetoric that solely serves, apparently, to set off a petulant president.
Then there are the impracticality and prohibitive prices related to choosing a combined fleet of jets in Canada’s airborne arsenal.
Reportedly, Canadian defence planners have insisted for many years that this cockeyed technique would show too costly. Two warplanes would require two coaching regimes, two provide chains, and separate hangars.
Preserve your Cheshire-like cool and maintain on to your shiny, costly bargaining chips, Prime Minister Carney, till you, not temperamental Trump, can win the profitable pot.
The views expressed on this article are the creator’s personal and don’t essentially replicate Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.
