On the finish of 2023, the battle between Hamas and Israel abruptly escalated. Inside weeks, the conflict on the sands of the Gaza Strip metastasized right into a broader contest involving regional gamers and world powers. Whereas a number of components formed the trajectory of the Gaza conflict, one of the vital—but not often mentioned—is the way it intersects with the wrestle to regulate commerce corridors throughout Eurasia. Thus, the 7 October conflict didn’t unfold in a geopolitical vacuum. Beneath the fast army confrontation, a deeper contest over commerce routes and international affect was at play. Viewing the conflict by this geopolitical lens reveals its deeper entanglement in Eurasian commerce struggles—and, extra crucially, who’s profitable the combat to form the rising international order.
Moreover, the 2023 Gaza Battle is the more moderen iteration of an rising sample. Certainly, the wrestle over international commerce corridors has performed out throughout latest many years by conflicts throughout the Eurasian land mass. The conflict in Ukraine, the clashes between Armenia and Azerbaijan, and the rising confrontation between Israel and Iran are all signs of a deeper wrestle over management of Eurasian transportation corridors. These embrace China’s Belt and Street Initiative (BRI), the U.S.-led India-Center-East-Europe Financial Hall (IMEC), The Russia-backed Worldwide North-South Transport Hall (INSTC), and the Turkiye-led Trans-Caspian Worldwide Transport Route (TITR).
These visions for brand spanking new commerce corridors replicate the competing ambitions of China, Iran, and Russia on one facet, and the USA and its European allies on the opposite, whereas India navigates a cautious stability between each blocs, pursuing a non-aligned technique to maximise its financial and strategic pursuits. Removed from being purely avenues for commerce, these commerce routes have change into battlegrounds of nationwide battle. In an period of shifting alliances and financial coercion, states are looking for to both safe their entry to commerce corridors or disrupt these of their rivals. Thus, the Gaza Battle erupted at a second when competitors over Eurasia’s commerce routes—routes that crisscross the Center East—was reaching a important juncture.
This wrestle shouldn’t be new. All through historical past, controlling commerce routes has been synonymous with energy. The Roman and British Empires, as an illustration, dominated key chokepoints—mountain passes, straits, and canals—to make sure the uninterrupted circulate of products throughout huge territories. An identical sample emerged through the post-Chilly Battle “unipolar second,” when Pax Americana facilitated globalization and deepened market integration. This led many worldwide relations students to dismiss geography as out of date, assuming that globalization had erased conventional geopolitical constraints. But, as American hegemony recedes, the world is reverting to a extra contested, multipolar order. This actuality exposes an everlasting fact: mountains, deserts, and seas create chokepoints the place states and non-state actors can disrupt commerce and reshape the worldwide economic system.
Constructing on these arguments, this text will analyze previous and current struggles for management over Eurasia’s commerce corridors and their affect on the Gaza Battle. Lastly, it would assess how the Gaza Battle has formed the bigger battle over the long run international order.
IMEC Takes Heart Stage
The rising financial significance of India and China up to now twenty years serves as a vital backdrop to the conflicts in Europe and the Center East. The previous community of commerce routes—the Silk Roads—that after linked Europe to the Far East has been revived. For hundreds of years, these routes facilitated the trade of high-value items, from Chinese language silk to Indian spices, fueling the prosperity of empires and city-states alongside the way in which [see here]. Nonetheless, as China and India declined in financial significance within the early trendy interval, so too did the relevance of those routes, giving approach to a brand new international commerce order centered on Western Europe.
China’s Belt and Street Initiative (BRI) was designed to reshape this financial geography. In essence, Beijing sought to assemble a brand new hub-and-spoke system, with China on the middle. The plan concerned huge infrastructure investments in Latin America, Africa, and Asia to safe provide chains and export routes for Chinese language producers. Nonetheless, crucial part was the revival of an east-west land route connecting China to Europe. Naturally, it handed by the Center East. To facilitate its bold BRI challenge, China has engaged with nations within the area. Backing its diplomacy with funding, China dedicated $4 billion to Israeli ports and transport tasks and $2.7 billion to Saudi logistics infrastructure. Since 2013, China has carefully engaged with each nations, positioning them as key nodes within the BRI. By means of high-level diplomacy, Beijing sought to combine Israel and Saudi Arabia into its commerce community.
Towards this background, President Biden unveiled the India-Center East-Europe Financial Hall (IMEC) on the G20 summit in New Delhi in September 2023. On that event, a Memorandum of Understanding was signed by the governments of India, United States, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, France, Germany, Italy and the European Union. The settlement aimed to mobilize $600 billion by 2027 to bridge infrastructure gaps in accomplice nations. IMEC, designed to bypass Russia, aimed to create a direct commerce hyperlink from India to Europe by way of Saudi Arabia and Israel [see here]. The challenge envisions integrating rail and maritime routes, linking Indian ports to the Persian Gulf, then persevering with by rail by Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Israel to Europe. In brief, lastly the U.S. offered a imaginative and prescient to rival the BRI. By backing IMEC, Washington aimed to uphold its Center East dominance and counter China’s increasing regional affect. Like China, Washington revived an historical commerce route to attain its objectives.
Traditionally, India’s financial and commerce ties with the Persian Gulf have been integral to the area’s business panorama. Since antiquity, commerce between India and the Gulf was pushed by the motion of spices and textiles. The Gulf functioned as an middleman between the Indian Ocean economic system and the Mediterranean world, with overland commerce routes passing by Basra, Baghdad, and Damascus [see here]. This hall was important to the prosperity of the Abbasid Caliphate and, later, the Ottoman Empire, because it linked South Asia to the markets of Europe and North Africa. Whereas IMEC doesn’t observe this actual historic pathway—resulting from ongoing instability in Syria and Iraq—it retains the identical geographic logic of linking the Indian subcontinent to the Center East and Europe by strategic land and sea routes.
Clearly, India noticed IMEC as a strategic asset for its economic system. India has lengthy aimed to transition from a services-driven economic system to an industrial powerhouse by initiatives like Make in India. Launched in 2014, the initiative sought to spice up home manufacturing and meeting. By enhancing connectivity to Europe, IMEC might entice international funding in Indian manufacturing and infrastructure.
Different potential companions had been desperate to embrace this initiative. IMEC, as an illustration, aligned with the ambitions of each Israel and Saudi Arabia to change into international transportation hubs. In 2017, Israel launched a plan to hyperlink Haifa’s seaport with Jordan and, ultimately, the Persian Gulf states. Equally, since 2016, Saudi Arabia has pursued its Imaginative and prescient 2030 plan to determine itself as a logistics powerhouse. To that finish, Riyadh has dedicated over $130 billion to infrastructure tasks aimed toward upgrading roads and railways connecting its japanese Persian Gulf coast to its western Purple Sea ports. By positioning itself as a key transit hub between Asia and Europe, Saudi Arabia hopes to diversify its economic system past oil, a objective shared by different Gulf states. A Saudi-Israel overland route might solidify each as a vital land bridge between India’s increasing economic system and European markets.
But a key impediment remained: the absence of diplomatic ties between Israel and Saudi Arabia. The Biden administration sought to resolve this subject by advancing a normalization course of, enabling financial cooperation between Riyadh and Jerusalem. Nonetheless, Hamas, the Palestinian Islamist motion that governs Gaza, considered this flip of occasions as an existential menace. Hamas inner memos detailing secret management deliberations reveal a number of components behind the October 7 assault. Key considerations included the enlargement of Jewish settlements within the West Financial institution, escalating violence by settlers towards Palestinian communities, and Israeli measures to strengthen management over Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, a website sacred to Muslims worldwide. But, clearly, the Saudi-Israeli normalization was a serious subject. Hamas feared that Saudi-Israeli rapprochement would marginalize the group and divert Arab consideration from the Palestinian trigger.
Nonetheless, to foil this plan and confront Israel’s military, Hamas wanted allies prepared to offer help. Hamas leaders repeatedly sought Iranian backing, informing Tehran of their plans and requesting help as soon as the battle started. Whereas Iranian officers expressed help, they requested extra time to organize. In the end, Iran’s response to the 7 October assault was formed not solely by its broader regional technique but additionally by its ambitions to safe dominance over key commerce corridors. Particularly, Tehran noticed its position within the Worldwide North-South Transport Hall (INSTC) as a profitable alternative, aiming to generate important income from transit charges.
The INSTC Beckons Tehran and Moscow
The Worldwide North-South Transport Hall (INSTC), launched in 2000, goals to hyperlink Russia, Iran, and India by a multimodal transport community. Combining rail, street, and maritime routes, it stretches for 7200 km from St. Petersburg to Mumbai, by the Caspian Sea, Iran, and the Arabian Sea [see here]. It gives Moscow and India with a commerce route that’s shorter and less expensive than the one which passes by the Suez Canal. INSTC guarantees to cut back journey time between Russia and India from 45-60 days to 25-30 days. It might additionally decrease transport prices by roughly 30%.
Just like the IMEC, The INSTC shouldn’t be a novel conception however moderately the fashionable reincarnation of a a lot older commerce community. Traditionally, Russia’s curiosity in a commerce hall that might join it to India by Iran dates again to the Viking period in Russia. For the reason that 8th century, the Volga River was a vital artery connecting northern Europe to the Caspian Sea and, by extension, to the profitable markets of the Islamic world [see here]. Lots of Russia’s wars for the reason that 16th century had been fought in order that the ruler within the Kremlin would management the Volga Trae Route from the Baltic to the Caspian Sea. This historic legacy underscores Russia’s long-standing ambition to dominate the commerce routes linking India to northern Europe alongside a horizontal, north-to-south, axis.
Like IMEC, INSTC hinges on India as its lynchpin. India’s involvement in each tasks displays its non-aligned technique, permitting it to interact with competing commerce blocs whereas avoiding full dedication to both. New Delhi additionally has good causes to help this initiative, essentially the most fast of which is its deepening vitality ties with Russia. That is one thing that grew out of the Ukraine Battle. After Western sanctions on Russia over its Ukraine invasion, India sharply elevated Russian oil imports. Thus, India might capitalize on discounted Russian crude. These imports have saved India billions in vitality prices, providing monetary aid amid international vitality value volatility. Latest Houthi assaults on maritime routes have moreover highlighted INSTC’s worth to India by decreasing reliance on the weak Bab-el-Mandeb and Hormuz straits for vitality imports.
But, India’s participation in INSTC started twenty years earlier than the Ukraine Battle and the Houthi blockade, indicating a long-term strategic imaginative and prescient. Certainly, like IMEC, INSTC serves India’s objective of increasing its industrial base. India at present exports $20 billion price of products to its INSTC companions however hopes that sooner or later that determine would rise to $180 billion. Higher connectivity would enhance the possibilities of this taking place. Demand for Indian textiles, petrochemicals, prescribed drugs, equipment, and electrical equipment is especially excessive in Russia and Turkey. To advertise INSTC, Indian corporations are planning to speculate $370 million to develop the Persian Gulf port of Chabahar in Iran.
Whereas for India the INSTC is aspirational, for Iran and Russia the INSTC is existential. Iran has been underneath heavy sanctions since 2012 and Russia since 2014. The INSTC permits Russia to deepen its financial ties with India and allows Iran to earn much-needed transit price income. In contrast with the maritime route by the Suez Canal, INSTC provides Russia a sanction-proof route that enables it to bypass the Mediterranean, a sea during which NATO navies are dominant. Moreover, the most recent spherical of sanctions on Russia following its 2022 invasion of Ukraine has deepened Moscow’s reliance on commerce with India, now the world’s largest purchaser of Russian oil. India, residence to among the world’s largest refineries within the Gulf of Kutch, processes Russian crude earlier than exporting refined merchandise globally. For that cause, Russia and Iran have sought to speed up the event of the INSTC. Moscow and Tehran have not too long ago agreed to speculate $37 billion in upgrading railways and waterways alongside the hall.
Iran has much more at stake in INSTC than Russia. It has confronted a chronic financial disaster, and INSTC provides an important financial lifeline. Tehran views INSTC because the cornerstone of a Eurasian bloc linking Russia, China, North Korea, and India. The challenge is about to draw $13 billion for railway and port upgrades throughout Iran, positioning it as a key transit hub connecting India’s dynamic economic system to increasing markets in Russia, Central Asia, and Turkey. It additionally establishes Iran as the principle conduit for Russian fuel, oil, grains, and fertilizers to India.
Nonetheless, this imaginative and prescient was threatened in September 2023 when Biden launched IMEC. As a rival commerce hall to India, IMEC risked overshadowing INSTC. Iran’s response to the October 7 assault should be understood inside this broader wrestle over commerce routes shaping Eurasia’s future. Following October 7, Iran confronted a selection: permit Israel and the U.S. to comprise the battle or escalate it right into a broader regional confrontation. Tehran opted for escalation. It coordinated assaults by its proxies in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen, whereas additionally, for the primary time, launching a direct strike on Israel—an unprecedented shift in its method. By sustaining instability, Iran sought to problem Israel’s regional standing, complicate its position in rising commerce networks, and reinforce its personal place as a important transit hub. But, regardless of these efforts, the regional conflict of 2023–2024 resulted in a strategic setback for Iran. Israel and the U.S. successfully countered Iran’s regional coalition, weakening Hezbollah and Hamas whereas additional straining Iran’s economic system.
Nonetheless, to date the largest geopolitical beneficiary of the 7 October conflict was neither Israel nor Iran—it was Turkiye. And to know why, we have to revisit the story of the Center Hall.
Türkiye’s Play for the Center Hall
Earlier than the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the Northern Commerce Hall was the spine of China’s overland path to Europe, passing by Russia and Belarus. This was a well-developed and environment friendly route. Nonetheless, the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine and the following Western sanctions on Moscow severed this commerce artery. Enter the Center Hall. The Center Hall—also referred to as the Trans-Caspian Worldwide Transport Route (TITR)— emerged instead. Operating by Kazakhstan, the Caspian Sea, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Turkiye, it gives the shortest rail hyperlink between China and Europe, slicing 7,000 kilometers off various routes and slashing transit time from two months to 2 weeks [see here]. For these causes, the Center Hall has seen exponential cargo development since 2022. Moreover, the Center Hall additionally provides an alternative choice to maritime routes, which confronted disruptions from repeated Houthi assaults on ships within the Purple Sea Straits. In consequence, within the first 9 months of 2024, cargo quantity surged 70 % to three.4 million tons. By 2034, cargo quantity is projected to achieve 15 million tons.
Just like the IMEC and the INSTC, The Center Hall shouldn’t be merely a response to latest geopolitical shifts. The traditional Silk Street has handed alongside the identical path (though it bypassed the Caucasus by northern Iran). In the identical method that the Ottoman Empire fashioned a key a part of the Silk Street, Turkiye, its successor, is a key participant inside the TITR framework. Turkiye’s Center Hall initiative permits it to place itself as a transit hub between Asia and Europe. To make sure that standing, Turkish international coverage maintains a fragile stability between its relations with Russia, China, and Western nations. To extend its connectivity, Turkiye harmonized within the final decade its rail community each with the EU and China.
Turkiye additionally invested in a prepare throughout the Caucasus. Often called the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars (BTK) railway, it was inaugurated in 2017. To additional solidify its place as a gateway to Europe, Turkiye constructed a railway by the Marmaray tunnel. Positioned underneath the Bosphorus, the tunnel connects the Asian and European elements of Turkiye. Moreover, Turkiye is launching an bold $3 billion trans-Turkiye railway challenge. It could hyperlink Kars, close to the border with Armenia, to Edirne, subsequent to Bulgaria. This railway line would go over the Bosphorus by the Yavuz Sultan Selim Bridge. Moreover, Ankara can also be within the strategy of investing $7 billion in numerous ports alongside the Black, Marmara, Aegean, and Mediterranean seas.
In contrast to Iran, Turkiye remained on the sidelines of the 2023 Gaza Battle, positioning itself as a stabilizing pressure. This technique allowed Ankara to develop its affect, notably in Syria, the place Iranian-backed forces had been weakened by the confrontation with Israel. In consequence, they might now not successfully help the Assad regime. Turkiye’s proxy, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), took benefit of the facility vacuum, solidifying management over Damascus. Traditionally, Syria has been a key east-west commerce hall, and Turkiye’s increasing position there strengthens its hand in shaping regional commerce.
Amongst numerous schemes, there’s a plan to construct a railway from Istanbul to Damascus, which can complement or join with one other Turkish challenge: to assemble a 1200 km railway from the Persian Gulf port of al-Faw, in Iraq, to the Turkish port of Mersin, on the Mediterranean shore, at the price of $20 billion. Dubbed the “Growth Street,” a memorandum of understanding to launch the challenge was signed this April between Turkey, Iraq, Qatar, and the UAE.
Ankara can also be strengthening its naval capabilities and deepening ties with Turkic-speaking nations within the Caucasus and Central Asia to solidify its regional affect. Nonetheless, these ambitions have heightened tensions within the Caucasus. Ankara’s help for Azerbaijan’s territorial claims towards Armenia exemplifies this friction. Türkiye’s stance is pushed by its objective of enhancing connectivity with the Caucasus. Nonetheless, ongoing hostility between Azerbaijan and Armenia complicates this goal.
Geographically, Armenia serves as a wedge between Türkiye and Azerbaijan. Armenia’s claims to Nagorno-Karabakh and Artsakh additional reinforce this divide. Azerbaijan misplaced management of those areas through the First Nagorno-Karabakh Battle (1988–1994). Due to this, the Kars-Tbilisi-Baku railway was constructed to make sure Türkiye-Azerbaijan connectivity, bypassing Armenia by way of Georgia. Between 2020 and 2023, Azerbaijan, with Turkish army help, reclaimed Nagorno-Karabakh and Artsakh from Armenia by a collection of offensives. Although diminished, the Armenian wedge stays.
Azerbaijan and Türkiye goal to resolve this drawback by pressuring Armenia to approve the Zangezur Hall, a challenge that might create a direct hyperlink between Azerbaijan and Türkiye by Armenia’s southern province. Their key demand is the absence of Armenian checkpoints alongside the hall. The challenge has reshaped alliances throughout the Caucasus. Iran has emerged as Armenia’s closest ally in opposition to the Zangezur Hall. For years, Iran has relied on Armenia to export items northward to the Black Sea and Russia. Tehran fears the hall would disrupt its commerce routes. On the identical time, Russia, as soon as Armenia’s strongest ally, now tacitly backs Azerbaijan, as its commerce hall to India—the INSTC—runs by Azerbaijani territory. This net of alliances and animosities each complicate the Caucasus’s place in Eurasia’s commerce corridors and underline its significance.
Commerce Corridors and the Map of Future Conflicts
Commerce corridors have formed international energy dynamics for hundreds of years, and their significance continues to develop. From the Viking-era Volga commerce path to the traditional Silk Roads, these networks have decided the wealth and affect of countries. As we speak’s wrestle over Eurasian commerce routes follows the identical historic patterns, with states competing for management over strategic transit factors. The 7 October conflict and its aftermath underscore this dynamic. The competitors between China’s Belt and Street Initiative, the U.S.-backed IMEC, and the Russia-Iran-led INSTC deeply formed the Gaza Battle’s timing and trajectory.
This geopolitical lens clarifies the winners and losers of the 7 October conflict—and the way the U.S. is maneuvering to maintain its hegemony. Following his assembly with Narendra Modi on 14 February, President Trump reaffirmed U.S. dedication to IMEC, calling it “one of many biggest commerce routes in all of historical past.” This implies that Israel and Saudi Arabia might nonetheless understand their ambitions to change into international commerce hubs. Iran might obtain an identical standing inside INSTC, however its bid to derail IMEC has failed. In the meantime, Türkiye and Azerbaijan are working laborious to strengthen their positions as regional transit hubs.
Quite than ideological conflicts shaping the stability of energy, entry to and management over strategic transit routes now outline worldwide alignments. Because the world enters a brand new section of financial rivalry, the way forward for these corridors will decide the geopolitical order of the twenty first century. On this rising period, commerce corridors are usually not simply routes—they’re battlegrounds.
Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations
