As US Vice President J.D. Vance’s latest speech on the Munich Safety Convention made clear, Europe appears to be the brand new “monster” of the US Presidency – how did this come about? Generally it’s useful to have interaction in a little bit of speculative evaluation to understand huge geopolitical adjustments of baffling complexity, to know the phenomena in a brand new approach. So, permit me to take you on another journey of what’s taking place with the US’ relations to its geopolitical allies and rivals. It’s a story of monster creation and monster mirroring, however most significantly how the connection between the 2 processes impacts the present US administration.
Creating Monsters
Teratogenesis (the time period is borrowed from the medical world, however its Greek elements merely means “monster” and “creation/formation of one thing”) we might think about as the method by means of which a state, a gaggle of states, or a posh of polities create a overseas monster “on the market”, which it’s essential to mobilise in opposition to and struggle. It’s the discursive building of a monstrous different – a projection not essentially strategized into being, however which brings collectively a picture which is rooted each in materials pursuits and traditionally saturated tropes. It’s the mixture, that makes it efficient.
In wartime, this is a crucial a part of the propaganda equipment: An instance might be how the British, through the First World Conflict, painted an image of the barbaric Germans, by disseminating info and propaganda about its atrocities within the colonies and on the western battlefront. As we speak, Russia is likely to be most blatantly invested on this, making a wicked and feminized “west” that may be a civilisational risk. It serves home and overseas coverage functions without delay – certainly, it connects the 2 in “productive” methods. This would possibly sound ominous, however most, if not all states have interaction on this, creating terata on the market, that require motion, taxes, priorities, alliances, mobilisation of sources and so on., whether or not in peacetime or in instances of conflict.
Larger states will do extra of this than smaller states, just because they’ve – for probably the most half – extra pursuits exterior their borders. Nice and superpowers have much more want for the instrument of teratogenesis. Typically, the mutual teratogenesis between two or extra competing nice/superpowers will achieve systemic traits, which sucks in different polities, that want to have interaction, selected sides, or evade the discursive internet of harmful or disgusting traits projected onto the opposite. We would think about the Chilly Conflict in such a approach; solely with the best warning might states stay non-aligned and band collectively to flee the “monster-logic” of the USSR and the US. We are able to name this systemic teratogenesis.
Because the enduring superpower of the latter half of the twentieth century and the “reigning” superpower of the twenty first century, no state has engaged in additional systematic, however extremely adaptable, teratogenesis than the US. Assume, as an illustration, concerning the transition from the Chilly Conflict rhetoric, by means of a quick unipolar second, to the rhetoric of “conflict on terror”. The conflict in opposition to terror, just like the Chilly Conflict paradigm, highlights two parts of the teratogenesis: though the creation of monsters is a discursive train, it’s not unrelated to actual considerations and materials info. 9/11 was a catalyst fuelled by actual ache and loss and coalesced the US and its allies round a brand new, and in lots of respects, actual ‘monster’. But, the method of projection was already nicely underway (Huntington’s Conflict of Civilizations, as an illustration, was printed in 1996) and its tropes and imagery, as Edward Stated has argued, went again centuries and had European imperial roots (Stated 2003). Second, whereas teratogenesis is rhetorical in substance, its usefulness lies in it condoning, mobilising or organising motion. Among the selections made through the ‘conflict on terror’-era appear nearly unimaginable immediately, with out the facility of the discursive bubble, even on people who remained sceptical concerning the American technique after September 2001 (Campbell 1998).
Lately, it has grow to be more and more clear that China is America’s ‘new’ monster. Over the past a long time, notably since 2008 and selecting up pace from Covid onwards (Trump’s constant use of the phrase “China virus” being solely probably the most blatant instance of this), American politicians and pundits have began to create a juxtaposed ‘different’ out of China, with enduring traits. In an article entitled “Yellow Techno-Peril: The ‘Conflict of Civilizations’ and anti-Chinese language racial rhetoric within the US-China AI arms race”, scholar Kerry McInerey argues that US media protection of the AI arms race evokes anti-Chinese language racism in 3 ways. It frames the AI arms race as a civilizational and organic competitors, portraying the ‘East’ and ‘West’ as “basically irreconcilable”. That is rooted in a techno-Orientalist historical past of the ‘East’ as each hypo- and hyper-technological, now amassing as a wave that may wash away the US. This Yellow Perilism, conflates and creates an undiscernible harmful mass out of the Chinese language state, folks and even Chinese language Individuals. They’re a part of the identical civilizational risk (McInerney 2024).
This teratogenesis has actual implications, as a result of it transforms what in any other case might need been a multi-faceted aggressive and collaborative relationship into an existential wrestle. That is encapsulated in statements like these of Senator Todd Younger (R-IN), when Biden was in energy, hoping that the administration would make certain “that we out-innovate, out-compete and out-grow the Chinese language and in addition starve them of the capital that they should proceed to construct their slaveholder state and their blue-water navy”. Certainly, as one latest information article put it China is likely to be the solely remaining bipartisan challenge left in Washington D.C. The CHIPS and Science Act, below the Biden administration, mixed two bipartisan payments for enormous investments in home high-tech analysis and semiconductor manufacturing aimed particularly at China. It is usually a coverage that enjoys normal and excessive help amongst the US citizens – this help is explicitly linked to the worry of the ‘monster on the market’. In the newest presidential election there have been a number of situations, and a marked spike, in anti-china language and anti-asian violence in opposition to residents in battleground states.
Some would possibly intervene right here, and say, that is simply pure realism: a former hegemon challenged by an ascending superpower. That is likely to be a very powerful underlying geopolitical driver, however what we’re fascinated about, is the constant and escalating rhetorical projection of monstrous traits that comes with it and – extra importantly – sustains it. Teratogenesis has the trimmings of rhetorical entrapment: the stickiness of the discourses provides a endurance past what is likely to be within the rational curiosity of states. And, extra importantly, it has the capability to remodel the creator itself.
Mirroring Monsters
Teratokatoptrismos mainly means mirroring monsters. My extra normal analytical level right here is that in each systemic wrestle of teratogenesis, the opposing nice/superpowers begin to soak up, or mirror, sure traits of their discursive different – voluntarily or involuntarily. The underlying motive might be that two or extra rivals, even when propounding to signify irreconcilable worldviews, acknowledge that the opposite is aggressive, and thus has sure traits which are enviable or instructive. Or, it might be a case of destroying the traits you declare to guard, within the effort of combatting the “different”. This was partly the case with the US’ conflict on terror: its mass surveillance (Patriot Act), unlawful wars (Iraq) and rogue use of a ‘coalition of the prepared’, eroded lots of the traits President Bush claimed to be defending the US in opposition to.
However with Trump, we have to dig a couple of ft deeper: He has absolutely absorbed the traits of America’s ostensible geopolitical rivals, to such a level, that he has, inside document time engaged in a complete new teratogenesis, recycling each the pursuits and worldviews of Chinese language Communist Get together and Putin’s Russia. To make this level, I would like to return to 2017.
Again in early 2017, I wrote a reflective essay entitled “Trump: Doublethink once more”, to attempt to make sense of the truth that White Home Press Secretary Sean Spicer and Senior White Home aide Kellyanne Conway, on behalf of Trump, intentionally launched the idea of “various info”. A sharp evaluation got here from somebody (nameless) working within the then not too long ago departed Obama administration shortly after Spicer’s uncanny press convention. The strategic purpose was “rising the separation between Trump’s base (1/3 of the inhabitants) from all people else (the remaining 2/3). By being instructed one thing that’s clearly improper – that there isn’t any proof for and all proof in opposition to, that anyone with eyes can see is improper – they’re pressured to select whether or not they will consider Trump or their mendacity eyes. The gamble right here – more likely to repay – is that they are going to consider Trump. Which means they are going to regard media shops that report the reality as ‘faux information’ (as a result of in any other case they’d be pressured to confront their cognitive dissonance).” We’re, (s)he continued, purported to really feel unsure about “whether or not info are knowable”.
The nameless evaluation, which went viral on Twitter, was inferring a strategic use of what George Orwell referred to as doublethink, the place the purpose is that one is ready to maintain “two contradictory beliefs in a single’s thoughts concurrently” and, accepting each of them, “[t]o inform deliberate lies whereas genuinely believing in them” and to “overlook any undeniable fact that has grow to be inconvenient” – “the lie all the time one leap forward of the reality” (Orwell 1949, 220). My argument was that it might be helpful to analyse Trump’s ascendancy to energy as a sequence of “doublethinks”: Trump is the folks/ Trump is the elite, or Donald Trump deconstructs the State/Donald Trump is the State. These, I feel, nonetheless largely maintain true.
The final doublethink I launched was a bit extra speculative: Maybe the supposed financial arch enemy – China – was simply as a lot a foe because it was a mannequin, I advised again in 2017. China’s success lies within the mixture of an unlimited and low cost labour provide, low transaction prices resulting from developments in know-how, radical adjustments in insurance policies with out being topic to an excessive amount of democratic strain, and a excessive diploma of protectionism (in China’s case by means of state purchases, direct subsidy, anti-dumping tariffs, trade fee controls and crimson tape). China had been the winner of globalisation the final three a long time not by abiding to the foundational liberal delusion that underpins it, however by constructing another mannequin atop of it – Trump appeared to suppose that this was a profitable recipe, I argued. The final doublethink was thus: Trump ushers within the new politics of American financial nationalism/Trump’s America is China.
This was placing too positive some extent on it, I assumed again then, and so I hedged my bets a bit:
Nonetheless, if Trump will get his approach, the American folks can be left with one thing fully completely different than China, and, certainly, one thing apart from a nation[state]: It is going to be the naked bones of a state equipment – authorized establishments, a capability for violence, and a steady manufacturing of doubtful narratives – geared in the direction of serving a narrowly outlined set of pursuits (Ikonomou 2017/2020).
Now, I consider that is an apparent case of “monster mirroring”, as a result of we might argue that the opposite a part of the equation (my wager hedging), is mainly mirroring the Russian ‘monster’. We have to do not forget that President Trump’s greatest doublethink – the doublethink of autocratic minds – was delivered from the very outset and is one thing he intends to serve the American folks time and again till he’s stopped: Make America Nice Once more/The American Dream is Useless.
The messianic MAGA-ideology receives a whole lot of scholarly and journalistic attentions, deservedly. But it surely was all the time related to his view that the American dream was useless. That America was weak, female, decaying, collapsing: Being cheated by the Chinese language, invaded by Mexican migrants, exploited by lazy Europeans, and corrupted by Washington elites. America had forgotten that it was robust, manly, imperious – somebody wanted to wipe the slate clear and begin anew. Very like Putin’s political venture grew to become to recreate Russian greatness after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the humiliating and disastrous expertise of the Nineteen Nineties, Trump desires to revive American greatness. Very like Russia has reintroduced the geopolitical pondering of imperial zones of curiosity, Trump now appears bent on making a Trumpian Monroe Doctrine for America’s ‘sphere of curiosity’. The transformation of the Republican occasion into ‘apparatchiks’, the efforts to purge and recreate a loyal federal administration, and the shut, corrupt and transactional relationship with an oligarchic class of CEOs, mirrors each Putin’s Russia and the Chinese language Communist Get together. In different phrases, similar to he’s mirroring lots of the traits of the “Chinese language Monster” in financial phrases, Trump has nearly absolutely absorbed the Russian playbook of “teratogenesis” in political and ideological phrases.
Trump’s rising radicalization, as many have documented, appears to be the results of the hyperlinks and ideological persuasions of the folks in his close-knit staff, Trump’s social media digest, and Russian efforts to affect and faucet into each. We’re witnessing the unfolding of this now. As Ukrainian President Zelensky acknowledged, after Trump claimed that Ukraine had initiated the conflict with Russia, Trump “lives in a disinformation area” of Russian propaganda. This, nonetheless, solely is sensible if we take note of the method of Teratokatoptrismos, which is rooted in his view that in competitors with geopolitical enemies, the American dream was useless.
Seeing like an autocrat: the European monster
With the 2 processes linked, the present US administration has not solely mirrored its (former) monsters, however it is usually wanting for monsters in the identical approach. Speculating about this might be useful, as a way to perceive the Trump administration’s view of Europe.
Europe is now the monster in a remodeled presidency, that has taken color from the teratogenesis of the previous. Europe is, as within the Russian civilizational critique, a bastion of wokeism, weak spot and decay. As Vice President Vance made clear on the Safety Convention in Munich, Europe’s best problem will not be an imperial Russia invading Ukraine; no, it’s its personal woke-totalitarian stance in opposition to far-right freedom-seeking forces inside its borders. In a MAGA-perspective the EU overseas is thus the equal of the Democrats at residence – they’re eroding the true values underpinning American ‘frontier heroism’.
The European Union, furthermore, is the purest type of the deep-state, bureaucratic swamp, that Trump has promised to empty within the US. And the EU’s laws and legal guidelines for enterprise, commerce, know-how and items, is the worst-case situation for the tech-oligarchs and CEO-cracy inhabiting the brand new administration’s high tiers. They’d love nothing greater than the European area being became a plethora of deregulated (and reregulated) and malleable financial zones (Slobodian 2023).
And as Trump’s plans for Greenland, Panama, Canada and different areas reveals, it’s, it appears, not solely simpler, however the truth is right, to bully shut allies and smaller states into submission, when they’re ‘too weak’ to withstand American unilateralism. With this, Trump has left behind not solely the latter a long time of pretending to uphold a rules-based order, but additionally the institutional structure that the American’s themselves have constructed over the past century.
On this approach, Europe is now trapped in America’s previous. A previous ‘rules-based’ order, marshalled by a intently aligned West, within the identify of free markets, democratic freedom and Atlantic superiority. As a latest report initiated by the Quincy Institute made clear, with the present trajectory, the US Authorities is nicely on its technique to permitting, certainly actively creating, a world of competing imperial orders, with spheres of pursuits in a multipolar worldwide society, whereas additional inviting China to fill the void of the US’s former international engagement. This would possibly swimsuit the short-term goals of the US, Russian and even Chinese language management, however it’s a harmful and unstable world to be in. The teratogenesis has thus come full circle, and if Europe is described as a monster, it’s as a result of Europe is a monster in Trump’s worldview.
With info unknowable in MAGA-land, we’ll witness the Trump administration engaged in an all the time shifting teratogenesis: day-after-day a brand new monster to kill, day-after-day one thing new to worry (in home strategic phrases, this additionally helps “flooding the zone”). One thing or somebody will all the time be ‘horrible’. Reverse, one thing or somebody will all the time be ‘nice’. And as we already know, what’s ‘horrible’ in the future, could also be ‘nice’ the opposite. And we, on the receiving finish, should have interaction in a monstrous quantities of doublethink, if we’re to simply accept this: We at the moment are to consider that Ukraine is each half and never a part of US peace-talks with Russia, as an illustration; we’re to consider that the US are Europe’s safety guarantor by means of NATO, whereas they’re undermining European safety and telling us to fend for ourselves. However, as I’ve speculated right here, there are particular longer tendencies that may be discerned and which must be instructive. I’ve tried to analyse this by means of the lens of Teratogenesis and Teratokatoptrismos – it ought to make it simpler for Europe to flee the Trumpian name to simply accept an infinite stream of geopolitical doublethinks and go for strategic readability.
References
Anna Rascouët-Paz (@rascouet). 2017. “Re Spicer’s lies, that is from somebody who labored in a previous administration. Essential learn.” Twitter (now X), January 22. https://x.com/rascouet/standing/823035518313267202?mx=2
Nameless. 2017. “f you might be puzzled by the weird ‘press convention’…” DC City Mothers and Dads, January 22. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/record/105/614062.web page
Higher Order Undertaking. 2024. Towards a Higher Safety Order. Quincy Institute for Accountable Statecraft. https://betterorderproject.org / https://quincyinst-bop.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/02141542/Toward_a_Better_Security_Order_Report.pdf
Broadwater, Luke. 2025 “Trump’s ‘Flood the Zone’ Technique Leaves Opponents Gasping in Outrage” New York Occasions, January 25. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/28/us/politics/trump-policy-blitz.html
Campbell, David. 1998 [1992]. Writing Safety. United States International Coverage and the Politics of Identification. College of Minnesota Press.
Kristeva, Julia. 1980. Pouvoirs de l’horreur. Essai sur l’abjection. Le Suil.
Lu, Christina. 2025. “The Speech That Surprised Europe” International Coverage, February 18. https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/02/18/vance-speech-munich-full-text-read-transcript-europe/
McInerney, Kerry. 2024. “Yellow Techno-Peril: The ‘Conflict of Civilizations’ and anti-Chinese language racial rhetoric within the US–China AI arms race.” Large Information & Society 11(2): 1-13.
Neumann, Iver B. 2006. “Naturalizing Geography Harry Potter and the Realms of Muggles Magic Of us and Giants.” In Harry Potter and Worldwide Relations, edited by Daniel H. Nexon and Iver B. Neumann. Rowman & Littlefield.
Orwell, George. 1949. Nineteen Eighty-4. Martin Secker & Warburg Ltd.
Patrick, Stewart. 2025. “Trump’s Greenland and Panama Canal Threats Are a Throwback to an Outdated, Misguided International Coverage” Carnegie Endowment, January 7. https://carnegieendowment.org/emissary/2025/01/trump-greenland-panama-canal-monroe-doctrine-policy?lang=en
Ravid, Barak. 2025. “Zelensky says Trump ‘lives in a disinformation area’ of Russian propaganda” Axios, February 19. https://www.axios.com/2025/02/19/zelensky-says-trump-lives-in-a-disinformation-space-of-russian-propaganda
Stated, Edward. 2003. “Preface to the twenty-fifth anniversary version.” In Orientalism. Penguin.
Sarlin, Benjy and Sahil Kapur. 2021. “Why China stands out as the final bipartisan challenge left in Washington” NBC Information, March 21. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/why-china-may-be-last-bipartisan-issue-left-washington-n1261407
Slobodian, Quinn. 2023. Crack-Up Capitalism – Market Radicals and the Dream of a World With out Democracy. Metropolitan Books.
Yam, Kimmy. 2023. “Politicians’ anti-China language prompted anti-Asian violence, battleground voters say in new ballot” NBC Information, November 9. https://www.nbcnews.com/information/asian-america/politicians-anti-china-language-prompted-anti-asian-violence-battlegro-rcna124508
Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations
