Synthetic intelligence (AI) is usually heralded as a pressure of progress, driving innovation, financial progress, and unprecedented effectivity. Tech giants boast of AI’s potential to revolutionize industries, enhance productiveness, and even deal with urgent international challenges like local weather change. However beneath this utopian narrative lies a darker actuality—one the place the financial rewards of AI are concentrated within the World North, whereas its labor exploitation and environmental destruction are outsourced to the World South. From the exploited employees behind AI coaching datasets to the environmental prices of huge knowledge facilities, the enlargement of AI is reinforcing historic patterns of inequality. Slightly than making a democratized technological future, AI is deepening the worldwide divide—what I time period AI colonialism—the place the advantages accrue to a choose few whereas the burdens are externalized to essentially the most weak.
Regardless of the notion that AI operates autonomously, the know-how depends closely on human labor—particularly, low-wage employees within the World South who carry out knowledge labeling, content material moderation, and different tedious digital duties. In international locations like Kenya, India, and the Philippines, tens of millions of employees sift by way of huge quantities of information to coach AI fashions, incomes as little as $1.50 per hour underneath precarious gig-economy situations. The character of their work will be grueling. Kenyan content material moderators employed by subcontractors for platforms like Fb and TikTok spend hours reviewing violent and disturbing materials, usually affected by psychological trauma with little to no psychological well being assist. In India, AI trainers annotate photos, transcribe textual content, and flag inappropriate content material—all important for refining machine studying algorithms—but they’re handled as disposable, denied steady contracts, honest wages, and authorized protections.
Whereas Silicon Valley executives reap monumental income, the labor that fuels AI improvement stays invisibilized. AI isn’t merely a impartial technological software—it’s embedded inside a international system of exploitation that mirrors previous colonial labor constructions, extracting worth from the World South whereas maintaining its employees marginalized.
AI isn’t just constructed on low-cost labor—additionally it is constructed on staggering environmental prices, disproportionately borne by creating international locations. The coaching of large-scale AI fashions requires huge computational energy, resulting in excessive power consumption and carbon emissions. A single AI mannequin like OpenAI’s GPT-3 can emit as a lot CO2 as 5 automobiles over their total lifetimes. This power demand is driving the speedy enlargement of information facilities, notably in areas the place electrical energy and land are low-cost—usually within the World South. International locations like South Africa, Indonesia, and Brazil have turn out to be hubs for AI infrastructure, however at a devastating price. These knowledge facilities require huge quantities of water for cooling, exacerbating water shortage points, whereas their huge electrical energy consumption usually will depend on fossil fuels, growing carbon footprints.
In the meantime, the extraction of uncommon minerals for AI {hardware}—reminiscent of cobalt, nickel, and lithium—additional entrenches environmental degradation. Within the Democratic Republic of Congo, the place over 70% of the world’s cobalt is mined, employees endure inhumane situations in hazardous, unregulated mines, usually with youngsters among the many labor pressure. Related mining operations within the Philippines and Latin America have led to deforestation, water contamination, and compelled displacements of Indigenous communities. These environmental penalties will not be borne equally. The World North advantages from AI’s conveniences and financial progress whereas the local weather burden falls disproportionately on the World South, whose communities already face extreme local weather vulnerabilities. That is the hallmark of necroexportation—a system the place technological prosperity in a single a part of the world is sustained by way of the systematic hurt of one other.
Some efforts towards AI governance, nonetheless, are already underway. As the primary complete regulatory framework on synthetic intelligence, the European Union’s AI Act goals to handle AI dangers, guarantee transparency, and regulate high-risk AI functions. Its jurisdiction, nonetheless, is restricted to Europe, leaving out the overwhelming majority of AI employees, useful resource suppliers, and communities affected by AI-driven environmental degradation. Equally, voluntary AI rules from the OECD and UNESCO emphasize moral AI however lack enforcement mechanisms, permitting main tech companies to proceed their exploitative practices with out consequence (OECD AI Rules).
Therefore, a actually honest AI system should transfer past regional regulation. World governance efforts should search to orchestrate all related stakeholders in direction of the next 4 goals: First, implement World Labor Protections: AI shouldn’t be constructed on sweatshop-like working situations in Kenya, India, or Venezuela. The Worldwide Labour Group (ILO) should set up binding international AI labor requirements, making certain honest wages, occupational security protections, and collective bargaining rights for AI employees.
Second, mandate Moral Sourcing of AI {Hardware}: Cobalt, nickel, and lithium—vital elements of AI infrastructure—should be ethically sourced, with strict human rights due diligence legal guidelines to stop baby labor, hazardous working situations, and violent useful resource conflicts.
Third, regulate AI’s Carbon Footprint: AI’s environmental influence is worse than most industries admit. Knowledge facilities now devour extra electrical energy than total international locations, and their emissions are 662% increased than reported by Massive Tech. AI regulation should embrace carbon caps, obligatory transparency on emissions, and funding in carbon-neutral AI coaching methods.
Fourth, guarantee Expertise Switch to the World South: The facility over AI trade is concentrated within the palms of some rich companies within the World North, whereas reinforcing technological dependence in creating international locations. As a substitute of extracting assets and labor whereas maintaining AI experience confined to Silicon Valley, the World South should be empowered by way of know-how switch agreements, AI analysis funding, and inclusive AI infrastructure improvement.
For too lengthy, AI has been framed as an engine of financial prosperity and progress, with little recognition of the human struggling and ecological destruction it perpetuates. But, know-how doesn’t exist in a vacuum; moderately, it displays the political, financial, and moral decisions of those that develop and management it. AI doesn’t must operate as a software of digital colonialism—however except its structural inequalities are addressed, that’s precisely what it’ll stay.
AI’s future shouldn’t be constructed on the backs of exploited employees, poisoned environments, and deepened international inequality. As a substitute, it should be designed as a really simply and sustainable know-how, the place its advantages are equitably shared, its prices are pretty distributed, and its governance prioritizes human dignity and planetary survival. This isn’t a technological problem—it’s a ethical and political one. Dismantling AI colonialism requires a elementary rethinking of who AI serves, who income from it, and who pays the value for its enlargement. It’s time for governments, establishments, and civil society to demand accountability—to reject an extractive AI economic system and construct one which serves humanity, not simply the elite few. A future the place AI is actually moral, sustainable, and simply is feasible – provided that we demand it.
References
Cho, R. (2023). AI’s Rising Carbon Footprint. Columbia Local weather Faculty. Retrieved from https://information.local weather.columbia.edu/2023/06/09/ais-growing-carbon-footprint/
European Fee. (2024). The AI Act: The First Ever Authorized Framework on AI. Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/insurance policies/european-approach-artificial-intelligence
Fairwork Undertaking. (2023). Fairwork Cloudwork Rankings 2023: Work within the Planetary Labour Market. Retrieved from https://honest.work/wp-content/uploads/websites/17/2023/07/Fairwork-Cloudwork-Rankings-2023-Purple.pdf
Hao, Okay. (2019). Coaching a Single AI Mannequin Can Emit as A lot Carbon as 5 Automobiles in Their Lifetimes. MIT Expertise Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/06/06/239031/training-a-single-ai-model-can-emit-as-much-carbon-as-five-cars-in-their-lifetimes/
Haskins, C. (2024). The Low-Paid People Behind AI’s Smarts Ask Biden to Free Them from ‘Fashionable Day Slavery’. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/low-paid-humans-ai-biden-modern-day-slavery/
Worldwide Labour Group (ILO). (2023). Generative AI and Jobs: A World Evaluation of Potential Results on Job Amount and High quality. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/international/publications/working-papers/WCMS_895344/lang–en/index.htm
Jones, E., & Easterday, B. (2022). Synthetic Intelligence’s Environmental Prices and Promise. Council on International Relations. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/weblog/artificial-intelligences-environmental-costs-and-promise
Mbembe, A. (2019). Necropolitics. Duke College Press.
Muldoon, J., Cant, C., Graham, M., & Ustek Spilda, F. (2023). The Poverty of Moral AI: Influence Sourcing and AI Provide Chains. AI & Society. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01824-9
Oxford Insights. (2023). Authorities AI Readiness Index 2023. Retrieved from https://oxfordinsights.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/2023-Authorities-AI-Readiness-Index-2.pdf
OpenAI. (2019). Vitality and Coverage Concerns for Deep Studying in AI. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.02243
Pogrebna, G. (2024). AI Underpinned by Creating World Tech Employee ‘Slavery’. Asia Instances. Retrieved from https://asiatimes.com/2024/10/ai-underpinned-by-developing-world-techworker-slavery/
Regilme, S.S.F. (2024). Synthetic Intelligence Colonialism: Environmental Injury, Labor Exploitation, and Human Rights Crises within the World South. SAIS Assessment of Worldwide Affairs 44(2), 75-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sais.2024.a950958.
Rowe, N. (2023). Underage Staff Are Coaching AI. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/artificial-intelligence-data-labeling-children/
The Guardian. (2024). Ex-Fb Content material Moderator in Kenya Sues Meta Over Poor Working Situations. Africa Information. Retrieved from https://www.africanews.com/2022/05/10/ex-facebook-content-moderator-in-kenya-sues-meta-over-poor-working-conditions/
United Nations. (2024). Basic Meeting Adopts Landmark Decision on Steering Synthetic Intelligence In the direction of World Good. Retrieved from https://press.un.org/en/2024/ga12588.doc.htm
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Struggle for a Human Future on the New Frontier of Energy. PublicAffairs.
Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations
