The definition of ‘small states’ has been lengthy debated in Worldwide Relations scholarship, with the idea that state dimension is an element largely determinant of international coverage selection. It additionally requires making the central assumption that decision-making processes of small states predominantly differ from these of bigger ones (East, 1973). Certainly, the query of small state company in worldwide politics is a dialogue which requires drawing on basic parts that lie on the coronary heart of worldwide relations, most distinctively, energy and constructions (Braun, Schindler and Wille, 2018; Barnett and Duvall, 2005). On this sense, students have been involved with how small states can train company and what elements allow or constrain their actions. For example: How did Iceland win the Cod Wars, and the way can we clarify the common affect of the Vatican Metropolis, the smallest state on this planet? This paper will argue that small states can exert company in worldwide politics, however not at all times might be structurally in a position to take action. Whereas small states can exert company by exercising obligatory, structural, productive, and institutional types of energy (Barnett and Duvall, 2005), they’re nonetheless constrained by the socially constructed worldwide political order, at given closing dates.
To form this dialogue, the paper will first introduce the conceptual basis of the paper, together with: 1) the ‘small state’ scholarly debate; 2) Barnett and Duvall’s dichotomy of energy; and three) the agency-structure drawback. Afterwards, there might be a dialogue on structural and obligatory types of energy and the way small states can exert company via their geopolitical location by utilizing the instance of Iceland within the Cod Wars. Subsequently, there might be a dialogue on the opposite two types of energy, particularly productive and institutional energy, primarily via the instance of the Vatican Metropolis State (‘the Vatican’) and its position as norm entrepreneur. Lastly, there might be a mirrored image on each case research, analyzing how state identification influences company. Total, this paper will interact with scholarship on small state energy and use two case research which have been classed by the literature as small states (see, e.g., Chong, 2010; Steinsson, 2016) for instance how, when, and why states can exert company in worldwide politics.
Conceptual Framework: Smallness and Energy, Brokers and Constructions
When it comes defining ‘small states’, the ‘typical mannequin’ has conceptualized them as having both a number of of those traits: 1) ‘a small land space’, 2) ‘small whole inhabitants’, 3) ‘small whole GNP’, or 4) ‘a low stage of army capabilities’ (East, 1973: 557). Nonetheless, small states aren’t a homogenous group (Panke, 2010) as they fluctuate in inhabitants, dimension, financial prosperity, and possession of sources, amongst others, with capabilities differing throughout totally different contexts (Chong, 2010). The idea of energy has been on the coronary heart of this debate, usually departing from the idea that smallness equals weak point, which renders small states mere ‘pawns’ within the grand sport of chess performed by probably the most highly effective states within the worldwide political order (Bueger and Wivel, 2018: 172). Thucydides emphasised the vulnerability of small states when confronted with extra highly effective ones via his well-known account of the Peloponnesian Battle the place the Melians are instructed by the Athenians, ‘the robust do what they will and the weak endure what they need to’ (in Baldacchino, 2008: 21). This displays the place of realists of assorted sorts and their assumption that states behave and performance in keeping with the established order, the place materials capabilities are key to exert energy over others (Lebow, 2016).
This paper challenges this assumption by proving that worldwide politics is just not a zero-sum sport however reasonably a extra complicated and dynamic construction the place small states can exert company in much less apparent methods, and possess political prowess disproportionate to their dimension. Regardless that there are a myriad of how of defining small states, this paper will conceptualize them as having a inhabitants decrease than 30 million and whose company within the worldwide political order can be constrained as a consequence of restricted sources, vulnerability, or the character of its geographical borders (Chong, 2010: 384). Nonetheless, ‘small states’ are a heterogenous group and should current alternative ways of conducting international coverage, relying on home and worldwide influences (Graham, 2017). Small states can oftentimes compensate for his or her materials weak point or ‘size-related disadvantages’ to attain their international coverage goals and exert company, though not all small states might be (structurally) in a position to take action (Lengthy, 2016; Panke, 2010: 13). Due to this fact, small states aren’t by definition weak, however their international insurance policies do differ from these of bigger states and are profoundly depending on the constructions of the worldwide system (Zupančič and Hribernik, 2011). On this dialogue energy is central, because it grants the ‘capability to behave’ (Braun, Schindler and Wille, 2018: 788)—once we communicate of getting energy, we conversely communicate of getting company.
Parting from these assumptions, energy might be outlined in accordance with Barnett and Duvall’s (2005: 39) definition; that’s, ‘the manufacturing, in and thru social relations, of results that form the capacities of actors to find out their circumstances and destiny,’ and embody 4 distinct types of energy which collectively make up their taxonomy of energy, particularly: 1) obligatory, 2) institutional, 3) structural, and 4) productive. Firstly, obligatory energy partly suits inside the conventional understanding of energy, entailing one actor’s potential to train ‘direct management’ over one other actor’s actions to get what it desires, whether or not deliberately or not, and goes past the possession of fabric capabilities (Barnett and Duvall, 2005: 48-50). Institutional energy contains the flexibility of 1 actor to not directly have an effect on actions of others via establishments primarily based on preexisting (however socially created) guidelines and requirements that may both allow or constrain motion (Barnett and Duvall, 2005: 51-2; Lengthy, 2016: 191). Moreover, presuming that constructions decide sure benefits, capabilities, and positions in relation to different actors, structural energy is when one actor makes use of its place relative to others, and the benefits it brings with it, to get what it desires (Barnett and Duvall, 2005: 52-3). Lastly, productive energy refers back to the ‘diffuse social processes’ whereby an actor beneficial properties energy via discursive or normative means, creating identities and defining what conduct is suitable or fascinating in worldwide politics (Barnett and Duvall, 2005: 55-6; Lengthy, 2016). Though these are totally different manifestations of energy, these may work collectively and provides rise to at least one one other (Barnett and Duvall, 2005: 44).
This ‘polymorphous’ conceptualization of energy is beneficial for understanding when, how, and why small states can train company vis-à-vis different states inside the wider agency-structure drawback (Barnett and Duvall, 2005: 40-1). The agency-structure drawback, as launched by Wendt, means that brokers (primarily states) are the architects in creating, shaping, and altering the social actuality of worldwide politics perpetually throughout time, and so they accomplish that via a construction that may both allow or constrain them of their manner of doing so (in Braun, Schindler and Wille, 2018). Constructions can have an effect on company, however via the creativeness, will, and creativity of brokers, constructions will also be remodeled over time (Carlsnaes, 1992; Houghton, 2007). Thus, brokers and constructions are basically interrelated, ‘mutually constitutive,’ and collectively form the dynamics of the worldwide political order. (Houghton, 2007: 28). This concept works in parallel with social constructivism, which sees worldwide politics as a socially constructed order—created, sustained and remodeled via man-made guidelines, norms, identities and pursuits—which even have inter-subjective meanings (Morin and Paquin, 2018; Carlsnaes, 2017). Due to this fact, the dialogue on small state company will work below these theoretical tenets, taking an agency-structure strategy.
Geopolitics: Structural and Obligatory Energy
This part argues that small states can instrumentalize their geopolitical location—the way in which the worldwide system is structured—to its benefit and from it, draw bargaining energy to get what it desires within the worldwide system (see Bueger and Wivel, 2018; Lengthy, 2016; Graham, 2017). Nonetheless, these geopolitical benefits are solely made doable via the socially constructed worldwide order at given closing dates. This may be exemplified by the case of the Cod Wars, the place Iceland used its strategic place in relation to america (US) and Soviet Union throughout the context of the Chilly Battle to realize bargaining energy in opposition to its adversary (Britain) and win all three wars (Steinsson, 2016). Though earlier analyses have been involved with the home political dimension of Iceland and the position it performed in its victory in opposition to Britain (Steinsson, 2016; Ingimundarson, 2008), this part will focus merely on geopolitics and the way the strategic geo-location of Iceland rendered it doable for it to train company within the form of structural and obligatory types of energy.
The Cod Wars entailed a collection of disputes all through the Fifties and Seventies over the management and use of fishing zones on waters surrounding Icelandic territory, however which had traditionally additionally been utilized by the British to fish Cod (Pincus, 2020; Ingimundarson, 2008). That is an attention-grabbing case since, other than its sale of codfish which consisted of the premise of its economic system, Iceland lacked materials capabilities, with no pure sources, nor military or navy of its personal (Roucek, 1950). Though Iceland may have been considered materially weak, it had structural types of energy via the next geopolitical and diplomatic particularities. Firstly, Iceland is virtually equidistant from Moscow and Washington and was so at a time the place the world was constructed across the bi-polar Chilly Battle dynamics, which rendered Iceland some of the strategically essential states on this planet. Proof of Iceland’s strategic significance might be discovered within the US army presence within the nation below the Keflavik air base (Roucek, 1950). Relating to alliances, each, Britain and Iceland have been a part of NATO at a time the place its unity was being threatened (Ingimundarson, 2008). Due to this fact, though it lacked key materials capabilities, Iceland had a powerful strategic place and position to play within the Chilly Battle order.
An instance the place Iceland exerted company was when the Icelandic authorities threatened to withdraw from NATO and take away the Keflavik base to compel the US to strain Britain to make concessions after the institution of recent Icelandic fisheries zones (Pincus, 2020; Steinsson, 2016). Through the second and third Cod Wars, the Icelandic authorities persistently sought to increase their fisheries zone, hanging responses from the British however by no means triggering a full-scale violent army confrontation past the launch of defensive warships (Pincus, 2020). This displays Iceland’s structural energy, which stemmed not solely from its positionality within the bi-polar Chilly Battle order, but additionally from its potential to interact in ‘uneven bargaining’, the place it may instrumentalize its ‘irreplaceable worth’ to the US, to attain its goals when confronted with Britain (Steinsson, 2016: 15). This additionally exhibits how Iceland derived obligatory energy from its structural energy, the place it was in a position to make use of threats to get what it needed (Steinsson, 2016). The Icelandic authorities was additionally ‘sensible’ in the way in which they performed out their political technique, as they managed to get different extra highly effective states to compromise with them, whereas avoiding a full-scale army confrontation (see Bueger and Wivel, 2018)—as Keohane (1969: 310) stated, ‘if Lilliputians can tie up Gulliver, or make him do their preventing for them, they should be studied as rigorously as the enormous.’ Iceland was in a position to make use of its geopolitical location to its benefit and efficiently exert company throughout the Cod Wars.
This case exemplifies the significance of constructions in international coverage the place the bi-polar Chilly Battle order itself was a social assemble, dividing the world in competing ideologies. Iceland was capable of achieve bargaining energy in opposition to the US as a consequence of its strategic significance in relation to the Soviet Union and the nice energy confrontation between them (see Lebow, 2016). This exhibits the ‘complicated interdependence’ in worldwide politics, particularly concerning the interconnected nature of the wants and actions of each small and highly effective states (Keohane and Nye in Steinsson, 2016: 14). Maybe, if the world had not been constructed in keeping with these competing ideologies and the bi-polar order would haven’t been divided on this geographically distinct manner, Iceland wouldn’t have been capable of exert company on this state of affairs in any respect. This exhibits how international coverage decisions of small states might be decided by ‘context-specific complexities’ (Graham, 2017: 149), extra distinctly via socially constructed constructions and the maneuverability of highly effective and small states alike. Due to this fact, the case of Iceland within the Cod Wars exhibits not solely how company is feasible for small states via the types of structural and obligatory energy, but additionally how constructions largely affect their international coverage decisions at given closing dates.
Norms: Productive and Institutional Energy
Small states may exert company by changing into norm-entrepreneurs or norm leaders, in any other case often known as exercising productive types of energy. This has hyperlinks to Nye’s ‘mushy energy,’ which emphasizes the significance of non-material capabilities, comparable to norms and concepts, to attain international coverage goals (in Lengthy, 2016: 9). This company can then be exerted via worldwide organizations (institutional energy) and put these states on the forefront of human rights and humanitarian actions, in addition to strengthen their bargaining place to have an effect on the conduct of different states in worldwide politics. On this sense, small states can endure ‘digital enlargement’, which entails magnifying one’s significance inside the worldwide neighborhood past size-related expectations (Chong, 2010: 385). These phenomena might be exemplified via the instance of the Vatican, which acts as a norm entrepreneur in worldwide politics (Barbato, 2013) via the morals and values of the Catholic church (Chong, 2010).
The Holy See is the federal government of the Vatican, who’s international affect stems from its connection to the transnational faith of Catholicism, and its former standing because the epicenter of the Roman Empire. Regardless that territorially it contains the smallest state on this planet, its theological presence has no bounds and is symbolically current universally throughout the lives of roughly 1.3 billion folks (Chong, 2010). The Holy See’s significance comes from its connection to the Head of the Catholic Church (the Pope), and thru the morals and values it attracts from its spiritual stance. The Holy See workout routines productive or mushy energy via its ‘ethical diplomacy’, utilizing norms and requirements to information its motion in its international coverage affairs and to weight in throughout diplomatic meditation (Chong, 2010: 389; United Nations, 2017). These values additionally correlate with those enshrined in worldwide regulation and supported by Western powers (Chong, 2010). An instance of a time the place the Holy See exerted company in worldwide politics was when President Barack Obama requested their presence as mediator in talks with Cuban President Castro in 2014 (McFarlane, 2016: 179-180). Right here, its position as worldwide mediator displays a state of affairs of ‘digital enlargement’ (Chong, 2010), the place the Holy See can use its productive energy stemming from its standing as norm entrepreneur to weigh in diplomatic affairs of different extra highly effective states. Due to this fact, regardless that the Vatican doesn’t possess materials capabilities, the Holy See can exert company as norm entrepreneur in worldwide politics via productive types of energy.
Concerning its institutional energy, the Vatican has everlasting observer standing within the African Union, the Council of Europe and the United Nations (UN), the place it has beforehand managed to change agendas of Conferences. Certainly, its good relations with most states forming a part of the UN has assured the Holy See voice and respect inside these establishments (Barbato, 2013). By these organizations, the Holy See additionally workout routines ‘management outside-in’, utilizing its morality and values to exert mushy energy in its international coverage not directly (Chong, 2010: 386). An instance of the Vatican’s company in a extra institutional trend was within the case the place it mediated dialogue between the US and Iraq alongside the UN Secretary Basic within the Iraq Battle. This yielded constructive outcomes, as following the talks the federal government was extra keen to cooperate internationally and expressed the potential for working in the direction of disarmament (McFarlane, 2016: 184). Nonetheless, there are different instances of small states exercising company on this method. The case of Seychelles as chief in areas of maritime sustainable improvement and safety is a noteworthy instance of profitable small state diplomacy (Bueger and Wivel, 2018), the place former President James Michel exercised management in creating the ‘Sea Stage Rise Basis’ (Baldacchino, 2008: 28). Due to this fact, via norms and concepts, small states can exert company in worldwide establishments, and worldwide politics extra broadly.
Nonetheless, small states aren’t at all times capable of exert company via worldwide organizations utilizing their productive or mushy energy. For example, within the Basel Committee some small states providing notable monetary providers have been excluded from the drafting of requirements that negatively have an effect on them by placing them at a aggressive drawback (Grynberg and Silva, 2006). As Carlsnaes (1992) argues, worldwide establishments can each allow or constrain actors—and there could also be instances the place extra highly effective states restrict small state company by excluding them from constructions essential for his or her international coverage goals. Equally, the company exerted by the Vatican is just not remoted from the broader constructions of worldwide politics. The Holy See’s energy stems from its standing as norm entrepreneur and the truth that lots of as we speak’s highly effective states both subscribe or respect the concepts and values of the Catholic Church. Chong (2010: 402) cautions that the Vatican has exercised its company in ‘rigorously chosen areas of time-honored excellence’—and that different states ought to comply with this instance, if they’re to achieve their ambitions to exert company. Due to this fact, regardless that small states can train productive and institutional energy, they will solely accomplish that at given closing dates, and generally on the mercy of extra highly effective states (Zupančič and Hribernik, 2011).
Smallness and Identities
Students have argued that state identification, and the inter-subjective meanings that any identification carries, is crucial for the examine of worldwide relations and to reinforce our understanding of state conduct and international coverage decisions (Inexperienced and Bogard, 2012; Lengthy, 2016; Kakachia, Minesashvili and Kakhishvili, 2018). Certainly, small state identities can affect their company in worldwide politics, significantly whether or not the small state thinks smallness can be utilized to their benefit (Szalai, 2017; Graham 2017). Thus far, the paper has argued that small states can exert company via totally different types of energy, be it structural, obligatory, productive or institutional, and do that by exploiting totally different types of benefits that counterbalance smallness-related setbacks. Nonetheless, an essential facet of small state conduct entails state identification, one thing highlighted within the theoretical foundations of this paper—social constructivism. Each, Iceland and the Vatican, considered themselves as small however not weak, which in flip led to the success of their respective international coverage behaviors.
Within the case of Iceland its identification is implicitly mirrored in its conduct in the direction of Britain throughout the Cod Wars, the place Iceland created an identification of ‘sensible and robust’—defending their proper to fish of their waters and acquiring their international coverage goals by utilizing their strategic location (see Steinsson, 2016). Iceland was sensible in the way in which that it used its smallness – a attribute used to justify it was not a ‘actual’ menace to different nations—to exert company exterior the safety dilemma (see Bueger and Wivel, 2018). When it got here to the Cod Wars, Iceland’s identification as ‘sensible and robust’ impacted its international coverage decisions as a result of if it will not have been sensible in its political technique and perceived its smallness as weak point, it almost certainly would have didn’t concern the collection of threats which led to its subsequent victories. Within the case of the Holy See, its identification as ‘ethical chief’, a title derived from its legitimacy as spiritual authority (Crespo and Gregory, 2019) makes it a super actor to mediate between different extra highly effective states and be a norm entrepreneur in worldwide affairs and establishments. By its norm entrepreneurship the Vatican has a ‘fortified identification’ (Szalai, 2017: 347), the place its smallness doesn’t stop it from having common attain to unfold its norms. Certainly, from its very identification as ‘ethical chief’ the Holy See attracts its international coverage strategy and its legitimacy to behave (see Crespo and Gregory, 2019). Due to this fact, each instances illustrate how small state identification is vital to understanding company in worldwide politics.
State identification can also be essential for establishing ‘ontological safety’—to grasp ‘who we’re’ with respect to different states within the worldwide order, and decide the varieties of relationships between states (Inexperienced and Bogard, 2012: 281). These inter-subjective meanings of identities can decide social interactions and be constitutive of the worldwide system. Nonetheless, these identities are fluid and malleable—able to evolving throughout time in keeping with political shifts (Mole in Kakachia, Minesashvili and Kakhishvili 2018; Szalai, 2017). For example, the Icelandic authorities has not too long ago expressed a want to be related to the time period ‘Arctic coastal state,’ which attracts its which means from the United Nations Conference on the Regulation of the Sea (UNCLOS) and displays an urge to be seen as a key actor in maritime coverage and safety (Dodds and Ingimundarson, 2012: 22). Conversely, the place of Holy See underwent a radical change of identification within the worldwide order, from its ‘onerous’ central authoritative standing within the Roman Empire, to a ‘mushy’ ethical authority in up to date politics (see Chong, 2010). Due to this fact, identities, as fluid and ever-changing abstracts, are key to understanding international coverage behaviors of small states and unwrap the complexities of the agency-structure drawback in worldwide politics.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Iceland and the Vatican have illustrated how small states can exert company in worldwide politics. Iceland confirmed how small states can use their geopolitical location to get what they need, on this case utilizing its place within the Chilly Battle context to realize bargaining energy vis-à-vis the US to win the Cod Wars. Alternatively, the Vatican confirmed how small states can use productive and institutional types of energy to have voice in worldwide establishments and to mediate dialogue between different extra highly effective states. Each instances are additionally examples of small states that used their smallness as a bonus and created a state identification which fortified and enlarged their place within the worldwide system. Regardless that these types of energy exercised by small states are extra diffuse and ambiguous than different extra conventional understandings of energy, ‘on a basic stage, it stays energy’ (Lengthy, 2016: 200).
Moreover, the agency-structure drawback was helpful in revealing the restrictions of this energy; in each case the place there was company there was a socially constructed order which both enabled or constrained small state motion. Whether or not it’s the Chilly Battle order, as is within the case of Iceland’s victory within the Cod Wars, or the historic legacy of Catholicism, as within the case of the Vatican, there’ll at all times be social constructions—created via inter-state relations, norms, concepts, and identities—that delineates the boundaries of maneuverability of small states in worldwide politics. Small states will generally additionally discover themselves on the mercy of extra highly effective states, mirroring the classical reasoning of Thucydides. Nonetheless, these case research are merely illustrative and don’t exhaust the assorted types through which small states can exert company—small states do not exert company in an identical methods. This essay solely mentioned Western, ‘developed’ small states, and these types of energy might look very totally different for different small states positioned in several contexts, circumstances, and historic time frames. They don’t seem to be essentially weak, but additionally not essentially robust—every small state could have various kinds of benefits, which they will make the most of at totally different closing dates, in accordance with a socially constructed order that allows them to take action. Due to the fluid and ever-changing nature of worldwide politics, small state company will change over time, and present itself in several, generally unpredictable methods.
Bibliography
Baldacchino, Godfrey (2008) ‘Thucydides or Kissinger? A Crucial Assessment of Smaller State Diplomacy.’ In Cooper, Andrew F. and Shaw Timothy M. (eds), The Diplomacies of Small States: Between Vulnerability and Resilience. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 21-40.
Barbato, Mariano (2013) ‘A State, a Diplomat, and a Transnational Church: The Multi-layered Actorness of the Holy See.’ Views 21(2): 27-48.
Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond (2005) ‘Energy in Worldwide Politics.’ Worldwide Group 59(1): 39-75.
Braun, Benjamin, Schindler, Sebastian and Wille, Tobias (2018) ‘Rethinking company in Worldwide Relations: performativity, performances and actor-networks.’ Journal of Interantional Relations and Improvement 22: 787-807.
Bueger, Christian and Wivel, Anders (2018) ‘How do small island states maximize affect? Creole diplomacy and the sensible state international coverage of the Seychelles.’ Journal of the Indian Ocean Area 14(2): 170-188.
Carlsnaes, Walter (1992) ‘The Company-Construction Downside in International Coverage Evaluation.’ Worldwide Research Quarterly 36(3): 242-270.
Carlsnaes, Walter (2017) ‘Actors, Constructions, and international coverage evaluation’ in Smith, Steve, Hardfield, Amelia and Dunne, Tim (ed), International Coverage: Theories, Actors, Instances (3rd ed) Oxford College Press, pp. 113-129.
Chong, Allen (2010) ‘Small state mushy energy methods: digital enlargement within the instances of the Vatican Metropolis State and Singapore.’ Cambridge Assessment of Worldwide Affairs 23(3): 383-405.
Crespo, Ricardo A. and Gregory, Christina C. (2019) ‘The doctrine of mercy: ethical authority, mushy energy, and the international coverage of Pope Francis.’ Worldwide Politics 57: 115-130.
Dodds, Klaus and Ingimundarson (2012) ‘Territorial nationalism and Arctic geopolitics: Iceland as an Arctic coastal state.’ The Polar Journal 2(1): 21-37.
East, Maurice A. (1973) ‘Dimension and International Coverage Behaviour: A Check of Two Fashions.’ World Politics 25(4): 556-576.
Graham, Suzanne (2017) ‘Drivers of the International Insurance policies of Southern African Small States.’ Politikon 44(1): 133-155.
Inexperienced, David M. and Bogard, Cynthia J. (2012) ‘The Making of Associates and Enemies: Assessing the Determinants of Worldwide Id Building.’ Democracy and Safety 8: 277-314.
Grynberg, Roman and Silva, Sacha (2006) ‘Harmonization with out Illustration: Small States, the Basel Committee, and the WTO.’ World Improvement 34(7): 1223-1236.
Houghton, David P. (2007) ’Reinvigorating the Examine of International Coverage Determination Making: Towards a Constructivist Method.’ International Coverage Evaluation 3: 24-45.
Ingimundarson, Valur (2008) ‘Combating the Cod Wars within the Chilly Battle: Iceland’s problem to the Western Alliance within the Seventies.’ The Rusi Journal 148(3): 88-94.
Kakachia, Kornely, Minesashvili, Salome and Kakhishvili, Leval (2018) ‘Change and Continuity within the International Insurance policies of Small States: Elite Perceptions and Georgia’s International Coverage In the direction of Russia.’ Europe-Asia Research 70(5): 814-831.
Keohane, Robert O. (1969) ‘Lilliputians’ Dilemmas: Small States in Worldwide Politics.’ Worldwide Group 23(2): 291-310.
Lebow, Richard N. (2016) ‘Company.’ In Nationwide Identities and Worldwide Relations. Cambridge College Press, pp. 145-178.
Lengthy, Tom (2016) ‘Small States, Nice Energy? Gaining Affect By Intrinsic, By-product, and Collective Energy.’ Worldwide Research Assessment 19(2): 185-205.
McFarlane, Amanda (2016) ‘The Holy See’s Diplomacy: An Evaluation of Papal Mediation within the Center East.’ Florida Journal of Internattional Regulation 28(2): 167-194.
Morin, Jean-édéric and Paquin, Jonathan (2018) ‘Chapter 9: Does the Worldwide Construction Clarify International Coverage.’ in International Coverage Evaluation: A Toolbox. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 315-339.
Panke, Diana (2010) ‘Small states within the European Union: structural disadvantages in EU policy-making and counter-strategies.’ Journal of European Public Coverage 17(6): 799-817.
Pincus, Rebecca (2020) ‘Arctic Geopolitics of Fishing.’ In Weber, J. (ed), Handbook on Geopolitics and Safety within the Arctic. Cham: Springer, pp. 291-301.
Roucek, Joseph S. (1950) ‘The Geopolitics of Iceland.’ The Social Research 41(8): 339-343.
Steinsson, Sverrir (2016) ‘The Cod Wars: a re-analysis.’ European Safety 25(2): 256-275.
Szalai, Máté (2017) ‘The identification of smallness and its implications for international coverage – the case of Hungary and Slovakia.’ Journal of Modern Central and Jap Europe 25(3): 345-366.
United Nations (2017) ‘FEATURE: Diplomacy of the conscience – The Holy See on the United Nations.’ Accessible at https://information.un.org/en/story/2017/02/550982 (accessed 9 Could 2024).
Zupančič, Rok and Hribernik, Miha (2011) ‘Small States as “Contributing Nations” to the EU’s Normative Energy: the Case of Slovenia.’ Romanian Journal of European Affairs 11(4): 34-49.
Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations
