President-elect Donald Trump’s spin on his nomination of Pam Bondi as lawyer normal is notably completely different from the way in which he introduced the nominee she changed. Trump portrayed former Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, who withdrew his title from consideration after simply eight days when it grew to become clear that his affirmation was extremely unlikely, as a radical reformer who would “finish Weaponized Authorities” and “restore Individuals’ badly-shattered Religion and Confidence within the Justice Division.” Trump’s announcement of Bondi’s nomination, in contrast, emphasised her in depth expertise as a prosecutor (an space the place Gaetz was notably missing) and her bona fides as a criminal offense fighter.
The next day, the Trump transition staff touted “broad acclaim” for Bondi, quoting Republican senators who had been decidedly much less enthusiastic concerning the Gaetz choose. A press launch emailed on Wednesday highlights “bipartisan reward for Pam Bondi,” quoting a Fox Information story that describes her “dedication to fixing issues and dealing throughout the aisle on high priorities.”
It will have been exhausting to again up any assertion of “broad acclaim” or “bipartisan reward” for Gaetz, whose nomination dismayed Republicans in addition to Democrats due to his quite a few scandals, scant authorized expertise, and repute as an obnoxious showboat within the Home. Bondi, who labored as an area prosecutor for greater than 18 years and served as Florida’s lawyer normal for 2 phrases, is indisputably a lot better certified to run the Justice Division than Gaetz, and he or she is unburdened by the moral expenses that helped sink his nomination. Nonetheless, her supposedly inspiring work as a drug warrior—a outstanding a part of Trump’s case for her—is far much less spectacular than he thinks, coinciding with a dramatic enhance in Florida drug deaths.
Fox Information cites the evaluation of Dave Aronberg, a Democrat who sought the nomination to run towards Bondi for lawyer normal in 2010. She subsequently picked Aronberg as her “drug czar,” a transfer he thinks “actually stated lots about her as a result of she received loads of criticism, withering criticism, from some members of her personal occasion” for appointing a Democrat to that publish. Bondi “was not seen as a really partisan individual” in Florida, Aronberg provides. He says she had a “sturdy working relationship with Democrats” and “would help laws no matter whether or not it was supported by Democrats or Republicans.”
Along with highlighting Bondi’s repute for bipartisanship, Trump says she did “an unbelievable job” in “work[ing] to cease the trafficking of lethal medication and cut back the tragedy of Fentanyl Overdose Deaths.” Fox Information likewise notes that when Bondi took workplace as lawyer normal in 2011, she “shortly earned a repute for cracking down on opioids and the numerous ‘capsule mills’ working within the Sunshine State.” It quotes state prosecutor Nicholas Cox, who notes that Florida “was the epicenter of the opioid disaster” on the time. Aronberg “credit his former boss as being the individual ‘most liable for ridding the state of Florida of damaging capsule mills.'”
The implication that Bondi’s anti-drug efforts succeeded in decreasing overdose deaths doesn’t discover a lot help in information reported by the Florida Division of Well being. The age-adjusted fee of “deaths from drug poisoning” did fall a bit after she took workplace, from 13.7 per 100,000 residents in 2011 to 12.1 in 2013. However then it resumed its upward trajectory, reaching 25.1—almost double the 2011 fee—by the point Bondi left workplace in 2019. The demise fee rose sharply in 2020 (as it did throughout the nation), rose once more in 2021, and declined barely in 2022, when it was 34.9 per 100,000.
In 2019, in line with information from the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC), Florida ranked twentieth on the checklist of states with the best drug demise charges, down from fifteenth in 2011. However regardless of that relative enchancment, Florida’s fee as reported by the CDC rose by 66 % throughout that interval. In absolute phrases, the variety of drug deaths rose by greater than 80 %.
Trump, briefly, is true that Bondi did an “unbelievable job” of decreasing drug-related deaths—however not in the way in which he means. It will certainly be unbelievable to credit score Bondi with decreasing an issue that exploded on her watch.
The correlation of aggressive drug regulation enforcement with escalating drug-related deaths is certainly not restricted to Florida. However Bondi’s method epitomizes what went flawed throughout the nation.
Bondi’s followers reward her for cracking down on “capsule mills,” which can certainly have made it tougher for nonmedical opioid shoppers (in addition to bona fide sufferers) to acquire prescription opioids reminiscent of hydrocodone and oxycodone. However the end result was elevated consumption of black-market options, that are way more harmful as a result of their high quality and efficiency is extremely variable and unpredictable. That hazard was magnified by the simultaneous proliferation of illicit fentanyl as a heroin booster and substitute—a improvement that likewise was pushed by prohibition, which favors stronger medication which are simpler to hide and smuggle.
Nationally, the crackdown on ache treatment was profitable at decreasing opioid prescriptions, which fell by greater than half from 2010 to 2022. However that discount didn’t sluggish, not to mention reverse, the upward development in opioid-related deaths, which as a substitute accelerated. Given the predictably perverse results of making an attempt to implement drug prohibition, that was no mere coincidence.
Drug-related deaths could lastly be declining. In accordance with the CDC’s provisional estimates, the nationwide demise toll in the course of the 12 months ending in June 2024 was 14 % decrease than the quantity in the course of the earlier 12 months, which is the most important such drop ever recorded.
In accordance with an evaluation by Nabarun Dasgupta and two different drug researchers on the College of North Carolina, it’s “believable” that wider distribution of the opioid antagonist naloxone, which shortly reverses heroin and fentanyl overdoses, contributed to that obvious turnaround. However they suppose it’s “unlikely” that anti-drug operations alongside the U.S.-Mexico border performed a major position.
Dasgupta et al. notice that current border seizures have primarily concerned marijuana and methamphetamine somewhat than illicit fentanyl, which is implicated in round 90 % of opioid-related deaths and greater than two-thirds of all drug-related deaths. As an alternative of decreasing these deaths, methamphetamine seizures could have had the alternative impact. “We detected a sudden enhance in meth adulteration over the Summer time, beginning in Could 2024, precisely equivalent to the rise in border seizures,” the researchers report. “The primary adulterant of meth was fentanyl. So, the impression of the border seizures could also be bi-directional: Reducing fentanyl-only overdoses and growing fentanyl-methamphetamine overdoses.”
Extra usually, medication appear to be “getting cheaper and cheaper throughout the board,” Dasgupta et al. notice. “If drug costs have been dropping for the previous couple of years,” they are saying, it’s exhausting to credit score “any suggestion that drops in [overdose] deaths have something to do with interdiction efforts or the drug provide being considerably affected,” not to mention to the extent “the place we see a whole lot of hundreds of individuals stopping use….If the drug provide is affected in such a approach, it could virtually definitely trigger an increase in drug costs, the place we now have seen simply the alternative.”
Such subtleties appear to be misplaced on Bondi. Fox Information studies that her former colleagues in Florida “count on she’s going to carry the identical playbook to Washington—this time with a watch to cracking down on drug trafficking, illicit fentanyl use, and the cartels liable for smuggling the medication throughout the border.”
President-elect Donald Trump’s spin on his nomination of Pam Bondi as lawyer normal is notably completely different from the way in which he introduced the nominee she changed. Trump portrayed former Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, who withdrew his title from consideration after simply eight days when it grew to become clear that his affirmation was extremely unlikely, as a radical reformer who would “finish Weaponized Authorities” and “restore Individuals’ badly-shattered Religion and Confidence within the Justice Division.” Trump’s announcement of Bondi’s nomination, in contrast, emphasised her in depth expertise as a prosecutor (an space the place Gaetz was notably missing) and her bona fides as a criminal offense fighter.
The next day, the Trump transition staff touted “broad acclaim” for Bondi, quoting Republican senators who had been decidedly much less enthusiastic concerning the Gaetz choose. A press launch emailed on Wednesday highlights “bipartisan reward for Pam Bondi,” quoting a Fox Information story that describes her “dedication to fixing issues and dealing throughout the aisle on high priorities.”
It will have been exhausting to again up any assertion of “broad acclaim” or “bipartisan reward” for Gaetz, whose nomination dismayed Republicans in addition to Democrats due to his quite a few scandals, scant authorized expertise, and repute as an obnoxious showboat within the Home. Bondi, who labored as an area prosecutor for greater than 18 years and served as Florida’s lawyer normal for 2 phrases, is indisputably a lot better certified to run the Justice Division than Gaetz, and he or she is unburdened by the moral expenses that helped sink his nomination. Nonetheless, her supposedly inspiring work as a drug warrior—a outstanding a part of Trump’s case for her—is far much less spectacular than he thinks, coinciding with a dramatic enhance in Florida drug deaths.
Fox Information cites the evaluation of Dave Aronberg, a Democrat who sought the nomination to run towards Bondi for lawyer normal in 2010. She subsequently picked Aronberg as her “drug czar,” a transfer he thinks “actually stated lots about her as a result of she received loads of criticism, withering criticism, from some members of her personal occasion” for appointing a Democrat to that publish. Bondi “was not seen as a really partisan individual” in Florida, Aronberg provides. He says she had a “sturdy working relationship with Democrats” and “would help laws no matter whether or not it was supported by Democrats or Republicans.”
Along with highlighting Bondi’s repute for bipartisanship, Trump says she did “an unbelievable job” in “work[ing] to cease the trafficking of lethal medication and cut back the tragedy of Fentanyl Overdose Deaths.” Fox Information likewise notes that when Bondi took workplace as lawyer normal in 2011, she “shortly earned a repute for cracking down on opioids and the numerous ‘capsule mills’ working within the Sunshine State.” It quotes state prosecutor Nicholas Cox, who notes that Florida “was the epicenter of the opioid disaster” on the time. Aronberg “credit his former boss as being the individual ‘most liable for ridding the state of Florida of damaging capsule mills.'”
The implication that Bondi’s anti-drug efforts succeeded in decreasing overdose deaths doesn’t discover a lot help in information reported by the Florida Division of Well being. The age-adjusted fee of “deaths from drug poisoning” did fall a bit after she took workplace, from 13.7 per 100,000 residents in 2011 to 12.1 in 2013. However then it resumed its upward trajectory, reaching 25.1—almost double the 2011 fee—by the point Bondi left workplace in 2019. The demise fee rose sharply in 2020 (as it did throughout the nation), rose once more in 2021, and declined barely in 2022, when it was 34.9 per 100,000.
In 2019, in line with information from the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC), Florida ranked twentieth on the checklist of states with the best drug demise charges, down from fifteenth in 2011. However regardless of that relative enchancment, Florida’s fee as reported by the CDC rose by 66 % throughout that interval. In absolute phrases, the variety of drug deaths rose by greater than 80 %.
Trump, briefly, is true that Bondi did an “unbelievable job” of decreasing drug-related deaths—however not in the way in which he means. It will certainly be unbelievable to credit score Bondi with decreasing an issue that exploded on her watch.
The correlation of aggressive drug regulation enforcement with escalating drug-related deaths is certainly not restricted to Florida. However Bondi’s method epitomizes what went flawed throughout the nation.
Bondi’s followers reward her for cracking down on “capsule mills,” which can certainly have made it tougher for nonmedical opioid shoppers (in addition to bona fide sufferers) to acquire prescription opioids reminiscent of hydrocodone and oxycodone. However the end result was elevated consumption of black-market options, that are way more harmful as a result of their high quality and efficiency is extremely variable and unpredictable. That hazard was magnified by the simultaneous proliferation of illicit fentanyl as a heroin booster and substitute—a improvement that likewise was pushed by prohibition, which favors stronger medication which are simpler to hide and smuggle.
Nationally, the crackdown on ache treatment was profitable at decreasing opioid prescriptions, which fell by greater than half from 2010 to 2022. However that discount didn’t sluggish, not to mention reverse, the upward development in opioid-related deaths, which as a substitute accelerated. Given the predictably perverse results of making an attempt to implement drug prohibition, that was no mere coincidence.
Drug-related deaths could lastly be declining. In accordance with the CDC’s provisional estimates, the nationwide demise toll in the course of the 12 months ending in June 2024 was 14 % decrease than the quantity in the course of the earlier 12 months, which is the most important such drop ever recorded.
In accordance with an evaluation by Nabarun Dasgupta and two different drug researchers on the College of North Carolina, it’s “believable” that wider distribution of the opioid antagonist naloxone, which shortly reverses heroin and fentanyl overdoses, contributed to that obvious turnaround. However they suppose it’s “unlikely” that anti-drug operations alongside the U.S.-Mexico border performed a major position.
Dasgupta et al. notice that current border seizures have primarily concerned marijuana and methamphetamine somewhat than illicit fentanyl, which is implicated in round 90 % of opioid-related deaths and greater than two-thirds of all drug-related deaths. As an alternative of decreasing these deaths, methamphetamine seizures could have had the alternative impact. “We detected a sudden enhance in meth adulteration over the Summer time, beginning in Could 2024, precisely equivalent to the rise in border seizures,” the researchers report. “The primary adulterant of meth was fentanyl. So, the impression of the border seizures could also be bi-directional: Reducing fentanyl-only overdoses and growing fentanyl-methamphetamine overdoses.”
Extra usually, medication appear to be “getting cheaper and cheaper throughout the board,” Dasgupta et al. notice. “If drug costs have been dropping for the previous couple of years,” they are saying, it’s exhausting to credit score “any suggestion that drops in [overdose] deaths have something to do with interdiction efforts or the drug provide being considerably affected,” not to mention to the extent “the place we see a whole lot of hundreds of individuals stopping use….If the drug provide is affected in such a approach, it could virtually definitely trigger an increase in drug costs, the place we now have seen simply the alternative.”
Such subtleties appear to be misplaced on Bondi. Fox Information studies that her former colleagues in Florida “count on she’s going to carry the identical playbook to Washington—this time with a watch to cracking down on drug trafficking, illicit fentanyl use, and the cartels liable for smuggling the medication throughout the border.”
