The up to date phenomenon of lone-wolf terrorism (LWT), accounting for 98% of US deaths from terrorism since 2006, is altering the face of terror (Govind, 2021). Therefore, the rise of this menace has offered a novel problem to counterterrorism insurance policies.
This essay considers usefulness as a optimistic impression on the ever-evolving understanding of terrorism and thereby counterterrorism insurance policies. Characterised by the governmental use of devices of nationwide energy to defeat terrorists (Stigall et al., 2019), counterterrorism insurance policies encompass techniques involving the navy, intelligence companies, and legislation enforcement. The effectiveness of which is taken into account a ‘essential measure of success’ by consultants, thus highlighting their poignancy (Hegemann & Kahl, 2015:200).
This paper’s construction permits the reader to progressively construct their comprehension of LWT and its impression on counterterrorism efforts. By following a logical organisation that primarily explores the foundational tenets of LWT-upon which the remainder of the essay is built- and subsequently advancing onto the pre-, then post-attack intervention, this paper allows a full understanding of the complexities of LWT and the relevance of its corresponding counterterrorism measures. This method additional ensures a complete analysis of the usefulness of the LWT idea in counterterrorism insurance policies by exploring the nexus between every side of this phenomenon and the bigger scheme of safety.
Nevertheless, this essay doesn’t intend to offer an in depth evaluation of each side of LWT. Subsequently, whereas different elements just like the position of gender and economics in LWT could also be related, the scope of this piece is proscribed to pre- and post-attack responses to permit an in-depth evaluation of the extra instant points referring to this idea.
Finally, this paper posits that whereas the idea of LWT is helpful in distinguishing particular person terrorist acts from these perpetrated by organisations, its effectiveness in countering the evolving nature of terrorism will be enhanced by refinement. Policymakers should develop a nuanced understanding of the traits, causes, and strategies of radicalisation of lone actors to make sure that securitisation insurance policies stay efficient, stop scaremongering, deal with public notion, and contemplate the socio-political influences of those assaults in a technologically advancing period.
Lone-Wolf Terrorism
Whereas the picture of a ‘lone wolf’ has been a staple in widespread tradition for the reason that 19th century, the idea of LWT emerged within the late 20th century from American right-wing extremists. White supremacists, Metzger and Curtis, used the time period to affect people to ‘act alone’ in violence (Hussain, 2022). Nevertheless, the 1995 Oklahoma Metropolis bombing by McVeigh was when this ideology started to see international mobilisation. Contrasting definitions of LWT exist attributable to its ambiguity and lack of empirical analysis; though this essay considers Mueller’s (2003) stance, whereby lone actors perform assaults individually and independently from established terrorist organisations.
A well-liked scholarly contestation is that this conceptualisation, as a result of obvious ‘ideological relationship’ between terrorist teams and LWT, which undermines the inherent ‘lone’ side of this notion, doesn’t the truth is exist (Fadillah et al., 2020:52). Furthermore, some recognise this time period as ‘lazy’ attributable to its inaccurate depiction of the issue-obscuring the true nature of the menace (Burke, 2017). This offers method to Brighi’s (2015:145) acknowledgement of the ‘mimetic’ nature of this ‘fourth wave’ of terrorism, which means that this sort of violence is closely influenced by the broader socio-political context through which it happens. This argument curtails that LWT is just not merely the work of remoted people appearing out of private needs, however fairly it’s a type of political violence influenced by their want to emulate the actions of different terrorists by media protection, political rhetoric, and on-line communities. Thus, it can’t be thought-about a person type of violence.
One other concern is the practicality of this idea. White (2003) argues that “LWT” glorifies these violent actors, who’re higher considered as true-believing extremists who go off the deep finish. Different consultants corroborate this by stating that the time period ‘romanticises’ these actors as ‘crafty and lethal’ (Jenkins, 2011). This false narrative might have damaging ramifications on the menace posed by this idea, legitimising violence which might depart impressionable people more likely to examine extra. To fight this potential for glorification, students usually change LWT with phrases like “lone-actor terrorism”.
Alternatively, described by teachers because the ‘new face’ of terrorism (Hussain, 2022), this idea is deemed extremely pertinent, whereas the normal comprehension of terrorism involving ‘organisational definitions and attributes’ is taken into account ‘now not related’ in some situations (Hoffman, 2003:16-17). This argument contends that whereas the boundaries of this phenomenon are blurred and enigmatic, this ‘ongoing menace’ must be addressed, as conventional counter-terrorism approaches are ineffective in stopping it (Spaaij, 2010:854). This idea’s unsure definition arises from the shortage of analysis into LWT, as a result of widespread false impression that terrorism is a collective and organised exercise. Therefore the separation between the 2 amongst students is ‘considerably problematic’ (ibid, 866).
Given the controversy relating to the adequacy of this idea, and the opposing viewpoint that it’s indispensable to up to date securitisation insurance policies, figuring out essentially the most applicable method presents a problem. Nevertheless, it could be counter-productive to get caught up within the definitional particulars of this notion that stay reasonably unclear. Fairly, it must be stipulated that regardless of this ambiguity, LWT exists and continues to take harmless lives. Therefore, the framework that this idea gives for distinguishing between unbiased and group-based terrorism is essential.
Subsequently, no matter whether or not these unbiased actors are really ‘alone’, or influenced by organisational terrorists, this idea stays crucial in counterterrorism measures. This isn’t to say, nevertheless, that this concept ought to stay unclear. Evidently, extra analysis into the phenomenon is critical to develop a extra nuanced definition that maintains readability in its software, which is able to assist securitisation insurance policies to determine extra complementary and efficient methods of combatting this type of violence. Lastly, you will need to notice {that a} common title for this incidence must be developed that doesn’t exalt the brutal actuality of this menace.
Pre-Assault Prevention
Traits
An ongoing debate exists across the definition and identification of LWT actors, with the first space of rivalry surrounding their traits. Researchers have challenged the oversimplified stereotype of lone actors as ‘solitary’ and ‘delinquent’ people (Miloshevska, 2019:338) by discovering that they’re characterised extra exactly by people with ‘high-anger and high-cognitive complexity’ (Baele, 2016:449), and thus, giving method to their tendency to be pushed by private grievances or psychological well being points, that are unusual in conventional terrorist teams (Spaaij, 2010)
One other vital discovering is the shortage of a ‘unidimensional profile’ amongst these perpetrators (ibid, 464), making LWT essentially the most ‘unpredictable’ type of terror (Miloshevska, 2019:345). Their notoriously tough detection will increase this phenomenon’s menace to safety. As an illustration, lone actors Kaczynski and Fuchs carried out a number of assaults earlier than being detained (Spaaij, 2010:867). This diminishes the utility of the idea of LWT in securitisation politics because it hinders the prevention of future assaults since policymakers have a minimal concept of whom to focus on counterterrorism efforts in the direction of. Subsequently, the shortage of a constant definition, alongside the issue in figuring out LWT actors, accentuates the need for a extra nuanced method to securitisation insurance policies to handle the elusive menace of lone wolves.
Radicalisation
Contrastingly, students counsel that authorities ought to give attention to ‘behavioural evaluation’ fairly than ‘sociodemographic traits’ (Gill et al., 2014:425). That is echoed by Shone (2010), dictating that when finding LWT, understanding how an assault is formulated is considerably extra essential than understanding who will carry it out. Understanding the event of self-radicalisation, the individualistic cognitive course of by which one embraces radical beliefs (Bradbury et al., 2017), that LWT perpetrators bear is vital to policymakers heeding this suggestion.
Comprehending the underlying psychological elements that affect particular person behaviour is essential in creating our understanding of radicalisation. Behavioural science signifies that people ‘act just like the individual they consider themself to be’ (Clear, 2018:35). Counterterrorist methods can harness this relationship between self-perception and behavior. This may be achieved with an identity-based method, fairly than a goal-oriented one, needed to vary detrimental habits like terrorism (ibid.) as a result of identification kinds the inspiration of behaviour. By addressing the basis reason for why lone-wolf terrorists determine themselves as such, policymakers might have a better likelihood of stopping these assaults by decreasing the probability of radicalisation. This highlights the significance of creating focused counterterrorism methods that contemplate the psychological and social elements that drive extremist behaviour.
The vital radicalisation side of LWT largely happens on-line by ‘social media platforms […] the darknet and propaganda on […] messaging apps’ the place aspiring terrorists discover directions to construct do-it-yourself bombs, maps, and diagrams of potential targets- serving as violence enablers the place individuals can eat and share disinformation (Hussain, 2022; Simon, 2013). By means of these interactions, lone-wolf terrorists kind ‘affiliative social ties’ with radical actors, even in situations of distant affiliation inside the ‘radical milieus’ (Miloshevska, 2019:346). A chief instance of that is al-Qaeda motivating and recruiting people by simply accessible boards like Fb and Twitter (Weimann, 2012). The Breivik Oslo assaults in 2011, described because the ‘greatest political lone-wolf terrorist assault’, represent one other instance of the dissemination of data and techniques, the place these acts have been praised on social media by far-right people (Miloshevska, 2019:344).
This offers method to the extremely contested matter of whether or not lone-wolf terrorists act fully alone or are influenced by exterior elements, particularly contemplating the web’s latest contribution to the rise in LWT (ibid.). Analysis demonstrates that lone actors formulate their ideologies by combining private frustrations with broader political, social, or spiritual goals (Spaaij, 2010). Martinez and Abdo’s tried LWT assaults exemplify the affect of exterior elements, particularly from cyber-space, as each of those perpetrators had accessed and possessed terrorist materials acquired by on-line sources that incited them to partake within the phenomenon (Weimann, 2012). Therefore, though these actors might not be members of terrorist organisations and function alone, they actually draw inspiration from, and sympathise with terrorist beliefs, and are in the end merchandise of their atmosphere. Policymakers should examine this self-radicalisation course of and perceive the position of various influences on LWT to develop ample interception and prevention strategies like limiting the accessibility of this info.
Coverage Implications
The problem in implementing efficient safety measures to fight LWT centres across the imprecise traits of this sort of terrorism. However, investigation and cooperation are two key practices that policymakers ought to promote in bothered communities attributable to their success in counter-radicalisation methods. These community-based approaches contain partaking ‘influential members’ of the communities to advertise hostility in the direction of terrorism, thereby growing detection and interdiction of LWT (Bakker & Graaf, 2011:47). This outreach is vital for acknowledging early-warning indicators of threats (Weimann, 2012).
Furthermore, since lone-wolf terrorists are primarily recruited by the web, it’s important to observe and research these websites. The NYPD efficiently employed this tactic by creating a Cyber Intelligence Unit through which undercover brokers observe suspected extremists’ on-line actions, which proved profitable in stopping Shehadeh from preventing for al-Qaeda (ibid.). This extra ‘delicate detection system on the tactical finish of operations’ than what is usually employed in counterterrorism efforts permits students to discern the crucial query of ‘how’ LWT happens (Bakker & Graaf, 2011:46). Therefore, the idea of LWT is helpful for offering a framework for investigating the traits of those lone actors by on-line radicalisation.
Nevertheless, web surveillance is just not unique to the specter of LWT. Fairly, it was initially developed to counter the specter of organisational terrorism and was included into laws like within the UK Terrorism Act 2006 following the 2005 London bombings (UNODC, 2012:28). But, in mild of the evolving menace panorama of terrorism, this method has been refined to focus on the emergence of LWT. Revolutionised strategies of figuring out LWT actors have been enabled by scholarly findings that ‘concrete actions and actions […] will be alerts which will point out an curiosity in terrorism’ (Brynielsson et al., 2012:204). This has been employed by Western democracies who’ve fortified their counterterrorism apparatuses by catering in the direction of LWT.
Particularly, that is achieved by isolating lone actors, as they’re extra more likely to succeed by coordinating with others (Byman, 2017). Equally, different specialised strategies have focused propagandists fairly than particular person actors, since with out the ideological backing of on-line communities many lone actors would by no means radicalise (Blacklock, 2015). Furthermore, Synthetic Intelligence is being employed for its means to cross-reference information to classify potential lone terrorists (VoyagerLabs, 2021). It’s only by using the idea of LWT that these efficient securitisation methods that align with present threats can happen.
Moreover, ‘consciousness applications’ are worthwhile counterterrorism choices, since they educate individuals on the gravity of the specter of LWT with out putting in public concern (Bakker & Graaf, 2011:47). This delicate balancing train between public consciousness and scaremongering is of important significance for policymakers, as lone-actors try to realize ‘optimistic public standing’ (ibid, 48). This want for public recognition will be recognized in Breivik’s publications, like his 1,500-page manifesto, launched earlier than his brutal assault. Supposedly, the idea of LWT is employed to ‘reassure the general public’ and talk that the ‘hazard is now not immanent’, whereas the media labelling the menace as ‘new’ and ‘harmful’ jeopardises this goal (Miloshevska, 2019:337).
Deliberation circles across the concern of whether or not LWT is useful for securitisation insurance policies, as elevated public concern and social acceptance of those assaults could make individuals much less conscious of the danger of different assaults and legitimise these actions, growing the potential for radicalisation. Finally, cautious consideration of the potential impression of the idea of LWT on public attitudes and behaviours is critical to tell efficient securitisation insurance policies which are each conscious of evolving threats and in step with democratic values to keep away from undue alarm.
Submit-Assault Intervention
The introduction of the paradigm of LWT has widened the understanding of latest terrorism. This permits policymakers to develop tailor-made responses to the menace, fairly than utilizing a one-size-fits-all method, equal to the method used to fight organisational terrorism. That is needed as a result of ‘considerably’ totally different danger elements for LWT in comparison with these of group-based terrorism, which require totally different counterterrorism methods (Monahan, 2012).
Though it solely occurred following the incident, this complementary method was demonstrated in response to the Breivik Oslo assaults. Right here, the authorities focussed their sources on the person and his motives, fairly than on wider networks or organisations. Prior to those assaults, terrorism was generally related to ‘collective, organised exercise’ (Spaaij, 2010:855). But, labelling these occasions as LWT incidents helped to dispel these misconceptions, and the publicity of the 77 individuals killed raised consciousness of the gravity of the specter of particular person actors, growing the probability of studies of suspicious behaviour (Smith-Spark, 2021). Whereas this publicity poses a danger of glorifying LWT, which may promote affect for “copycat type” future LWT assaults, the investigation into Breivik’s prior actions and manifesto make clear early-warning alerts and the aforementioned vital position of radicalisation (Ranstorp, 2013). General, the usage of LWT had a optimistic impression on the response of the authorities and the general public, by enhancing the understanding of this idea for future counterterrorism endeavours.
However the commendable results of the idea of LWT used within the response to the Breivik assaults, questions have been raised relating to the authorities’ poor intelligence gathering and lack of communication, which amounted to ignorance of the broader socio-political elements that interaction with terrorism. Such oversights will be detrimental to securitisation insurance policies, by impeding the comprehension and in flip prevention of those sorts of assaults. The killing of Fusilier Rigby by two terrorists, justified as revenge for the homicide of Muslims by the UK navy, is a potent instance of the gravity of the position that exterior elements (like a way of injustice) can play in these assaults (Hussain, 2022). Ignorance of such a big side of this concern might have grave ramifications.
As an ‘integral’ aspect of terrorism, the causes of those actions must be of paramount significance, significantly when contemplating the suitable implementation of safety measures (Bren et al., 2019:179). The authorities’ sole give attention to the person perpetrator as a lone actor within the Breivik assaults highlights this ignorance of the basis causes of LWT. Neglecting to handle the underlying elements that contribute to LWT might perpetuate future assaults for the reason that most difficult side of detecting LWT is figuring out the context across the actors’ beliefs (Miloshevska, 2019). Therefore, a nuanced method that considers LWT as being comprised of the person actors alongside the broader contextual atmosphere is required for creating ample securitisation insurance policies.
Moreover, some theorists have considerations that the specter of LWT is being overestimated in securitisation insurance policies. This “terrorism catastrophization” – related to the concern of ongoing terror threats – leads to extreme give attention to particular person actors, whereas insurance policies neglect the broader structural elements that contribute to terrorism (Doak & Katsikitis, 2018). Not solely can this neglect facilitate a false sense of safety, however it runs the danger of extreme sources being devoted to this concern.
The notion of disproportionality seems considerably obvious, provided that LWT accounts for a mere 1.28% of all terrorist occurrences inside 15 pattern nations from 1968 to 2007, along with its comparatively restricted ‘societal impression’ compared to the ramifications of assaults perpetrated by bigger terrorist organisations (Spaaij, 2010:859-867). Though contemplating the huge escalation of LWT from 5% to a staggering 70% of all terrorist assaults between 1970 and 2018, this phenomenon seems to be on an alarmingly steep trajectory (Imaginative and prescient of Humanity, 2020). Thus, it’s crucial to institute important measures geared toward curbing this exponential progress earlier than it begins to inhabit a bigger proportion of all terrorist assaults. Therefore, this heightened give attention to LWT in up to date safety measures is critical.
Nevertheless, points come up with the slender focus of this method, being that it will probably result in a misinterpretation of the menace, as exemplified by the Orlando nightclub capturing in 2016. Initially, Mateen, the perpetrator, was portrayed as a lone actor, whereas subsequent proof emerged tying him to the Islamic State (Ackerman, 2016), thus, blurring the road between organised and particular person terrorism. Whereas LWT has resulted in elevated consciousness across the significance of funding in Energetic Shooter Protocol for legislation enforcement (Ranstorp, 2013:92), higher useful resource allocation and understanding of the character and causes of the menace might have been achieved had this assault been appropriately recognized, which might have elevated the general efficacy of securitisation insurance policies.
Nonetheless, regardless of its drawbacks, the idea of LWT stays a worthwhile device in counterterrorism insurance policies when utilized prudently. To reinforce its effectiveness, policymakers ought to goal to think about the complexities of terrorism and undertake a extra complete method to counterterrorism.
Future Instructions
To deal with the constraints of the prevailing notion of LWT, a multifaceted process is critical. Primarily, extra analysis is required to higher perceive the elements that contribute to LWT – significantly the more and more pertinent position of the web in self-radicalisation. This ameliorated data about radicalisation will enhance the probability of efficient counterterrorism measures being developed contra LWT (Shone, 2010).
Additional to this, students should cease falling into the entice of ‘lumping lone-wolf terrorists with group-based terrorists’, which conceals essential info (Monahan, 2012:197). Fairly, they need to make use of the one optimistic side of this phenomenon’s latest reputation: a rise in information. New information assortment strategies like interviews and first-hand accounts with lone actors and their associates would allow policymakers to realize a greater perception into this paradigm. Moreover, totally different specialists like intelligence analysts and tradecraft professionals ought to collaborate to seek out indicators of how LWT assaults are curated. This may enhance the efficacy of prevention ‘left of the bang’ (Shone, 2010).
Conclusion
The proliferation of terrorism, aided by the rising accessibility and use of our on-line world for the dissemination of terrorist propaganda, has remodeled the utility of the idea of LWT in securitisation insurance policies. Whereas limitations are inherent in a quickly evolving safety atmosphere with a broadening menace panorama, the incipient LWT idea displays a number of shortcomings. Such drawbacks might discourage some, who consider that the obstacles launched by this idea to counterterrorism insurance policies outweigh its benefits. Nevertheless, policymakers should recognise the optimistic implications of this idea as soon as they’ve absolutely comprehended and developed it.
As soon as policymakers devise a extra nuanced technique that exploits their increasing understanding of radicalisation, LWT causes, and traits, whereas placing a stability between public concern and consciousness, the framework offered by this idea shall be a vital component in counterterrorism insurance policies. The momentary usefulness of this idea is simply the tip of the iceberg; its potential in up to date responses to the specter of LWT in a modernised period is huge.
Bibliography
Books:
Clear, J. (2018) Atomic Habits, UK: Penguin Random Home.
Jenkins, B. (2011) Stray Canine and Digital Armies: Radicalization and Recruitment to Jihadist Terrorism in the US Since 9/11, Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
White, J. (2003) Terrorism: An Introduction, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Journal Articles:
Baele, S. J., 2017. Lone‐actor terrorists’ feelings and cognition: An analysis past stereotypes. Political Psychology, 38 (3), pp. 449-468.
Bakker, E. and De Graaf, B., 2011. Stopping lone wolf terrorism: Some CT approaches addressed. Views on Terrorism, 5 (5/6), pp. 43-50.
Bradbury, R., Bossomaier, T. and Kernot, D., 2017. Predicting the emergence of self-radicalisation by social media: a posh techniques method. Terrorists’ Use of the Web: Evaluation and Response, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 379-89.
Bren, J., Zeman, T. and City, R., 2019. Hyperlink between terrorism and social, financial and security-political elements. The Constructed Surroundings. p. 179.
Brighi, E., 2015. The mimetic politics of lone-wolf terrorism. Journal of Worldwide Political Concept, 11 (1), pp.1 45-164.
Brynielsson, J., Horndahl, A., Johansson, F., Kaati, L., Mårtenson, C. and Svenson, P., 2012, August. Evaluation of weak alerts for detecting lone wolf terrorists. In 2012 European Intelligence and Safety Informatics Convention pp. 197-204.
Doak, J. and Katsikitis, M., 2018. Terrorism catastrophization: An investigation of predicting and moderating elements. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 2 (1), pp. 1-12.
Fadillah, F., Machyawaty, T. and Suseno, B., 2020. IN IDEOLOGY: THERE IS NO LONE-WOLF TERRORISM. Worldwide Assessment of Humanities Research, 5 (1).
Gill, P., Horgan, J. and Deckert, P., 2014. Bombing alone: Tracing the motivations and antecedent behaviors of lone‐actor terrorists. Journal of forensic sciences, 59 (2), pp. 425-435.
Hegemann, H. and Kahl, M., 2015. Constructions of effectiveness and the rationalization of counterterrorism coverage: the case of biometric passports. Research in Battle & Terrorism, 38 (3), pp. 199-218.
Hoffman, B., 2003. Al Qaeda, tendencies in terrorism, and future potentialities: An evaluation. Research in Battle & Terrorism, 26 (6), pp. 429-442.
Miloshevska, T., 2019. The idea of lone-wolf terrorists. Годишен зборник на Филозофскиот факултет/Annuaire de la Faculté de Philosophie. pp. 337-349.
Monahan, J., 2012. The person danger evaluation of terrorism. Psychology, Public Coverage, and Legislation, 18 (2), p. 167.
Ranstorp, M., 2013. ‘Lone Wolf Terrorism’. The Case of Anders Breivik. Sicherheit und Frieden (S+ F)/Safety and Peace, pp. 87-92.
Shone, A., 2010. Countering Lone Wolf Terrorism: Sustaining the CONTEST Imaginative and prescient. Henry Jackson Society, p. 17.
Spaaij, R. 2010. The Enigma of Lone Wolf Terrorism: An Evaluation, Research in Battle & Terrorism, 33 (9), pp. 854-870
Weimann, G., 2012. Lone wolves in our on-line world. Journal of Terrorism Analysis, 3 (2), pp. 75-90.
On-line Newspaper Articles:
Burke, J. (2017) ‘The Fantasy of the ‘Lone Wolf’ Terrorist’, The Guardian, 30th March [Online] Accessible at: https://www.theguardian.com/information/2017/mar/30/myth-lone-wolf-terrorist (Accessed: 15th March 2023).
Ackerman, S. (2016) ‘Orlando Gunman Recognized to FBI Exhibits Issue of ‘Lone Wolf’ Instances’, The Guardian, 12th June [Online] Accessible at: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/12/florida-gunman-omar-mateen-fbi-lone-wolf (Accessed: 15th March 2023).
Stories:
Stigall, E., Miller, C., Donatucci, L. (2019). The 2018 Nationwide Technique for Counterterrorism: A Synoptic Overview, Washington: American College Nationwide Safety Legislation Transient. [Online] Accessible at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3466967# (Accessed: 15th March 2023).
United Nations Workplace on Medicine and Crime (UNDOC) (2012). The Use of The Web for Terrorist Functions, Vienna: United Nations Workplace on Medicine and Crime. [Online] Accessible at: https://www.unodc.org/paperwork/frontpage/Use_of_Internet_for_Terrorist_Purposes.pdf (Accessed: 15th March 2023).
Imaginative and prescient of Humanity (2020). Lone Wolf Terrorism Will increase in 2019 International Terrorism Index [Online] Accessible at: https://www.visionofhumanity.org/increase-in-self-radicalised-lone-wolf-attackers-2019-global-terrorism-index/ (Accessed: 15th March 2023).
Statute:
UK Terrorism Act 2006.
Testimonies:
Mueller III, R. “Warfare on Terrorism.” Testimony earlier than the Choose Committee on Intelligence of the US Senate, Washington, DC, 11 February 2003.
Web sites:
Blacklock, J. (2015) Lone Wolf Terrorism: Leaderless Resistance, Accessible at: https://www.phc.edu/intelligencer/lone-wolf (Accessed: 15th March 2023).
Byman, D. (2017) Find out how to hunt a lone wolf: Countering terrorists who act on their very own, Accessible at: https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/how-to-hunt-a-lone-wolf-countering-terrorists-who-act-on-their-own/ (Accessed: 15th March 2023).
Govind, D. (2021). Lone Wolf Terrorism: The Biggest Home Terror Risk At present, Accessible at: https://www.biometrica.com/lone-wolf-terrorism-the-greatest-domestic-terror-threat-today/ (Accessed: 15th March 2023).
Hussain, T. (2022) The Rising Risk of Lone-Wolf Terrorism – Evaluation, Accessible at: https://www.eurasiareview.com/21122022-the-growing-threat-of-lone-wolf-terrorism-analysis/ (Accessed: 15th March 2023).
Simon, J. (2013) What makes lone-wolf terrorists so harmful?, Accessible at: https://newsroom.ucla.edu/tales/what-makes-lone-wolfe-terrorists-245316 (Accessed: 15th March 2023).
Smith-Spark, L. (2021) A Far-Proper Extremist Killed 77 Individuals in Norway. A Decade On, ‘The Hatred is Nonetheless Out There’ However Attacker’s Affect is Seen as Low, Accessible at: https://version.cnn.com/2021/07/22/europe/anders-breivik-july-22-attacks-norway-anniversary-cmd-intl/index.html (Accessed: 15th March 2023).
VoyagerLabs (2021) AI and the Quest to Forestall Lone Wolf Assaults, Avalaible at: https://www.voyager-labs.com/artificial-intelligence-and-the-quest-to-prevent-lone-wolf-attacks/ (Accessed: 15th March 2023).
Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations
