The examine of Russian info operations has seen an explosion since 2014. That is seen within the variety of publications on the subject since that 12 months. As an instance this level, a fast survey of aggregating platforms of educational journals (JSTOR, Taylor and Francis On-line, Google Scholar) is adequate. Querying the platform JSTOR with the search phrases [“Russia” “information operations”] produces 169 publications general, solely 40 of which had been revealed earlier than 2014. The platform Taylor and Francis On-line produces 19 publications comparable to this search time period with a publication date as much as 2014, and 40 general. Google Scholar produces 628 outcomes revealed earlier than 2014, and 2200 general.[1] Moreover, establishments that concentrate on finding out, documenting, and counteracting Russian info operations had been arrange after 2014. The 2 most notable ones are the NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence (Bentzen, 2016, p. 3) and the East Stratcom Activity Drive beneath the European Exterior Motion Service (Vilson, 2016, p. 127).
Such an explosion of educational curiosity is defined by the annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation in March 2014 (Giles, 2016, p. 2) and the extraordinarily profitable informational part that it featured (McIntosh, 2015, pp. 299-300). Russian info operations had been studied pre-2014. Examples are the 2007 cyberattacks towards Estonia (Lange-Ionatamisvili, 2015, p. 3) and Georgia’s “victory” on the informational entrance within the 2008 conflict (Thomas, 2010, pp. 279-282). Nonetheless, the Crimean operation reshaped the sphere, producing a streak of multidisciplinary, complete research between 2014 and 2016.
Following 2016, the sphere underwent a second shift. The intervention of the Russian particular companies into the US presidential elections made clear that “hybrid warfare”—together with info operations—was extra related than thought even after Crimea. This operation globalised the scope taken to check Russian info operations. If the US was weak, so was everyone else. As a consequence, regional initiatives began showing, investigating Russian info operations within the native language. This led to the splintering of the sphere geographically, and to the decreased consideration to the widespread developments of Russian info operations, one of many key topics of the literature round Crimea.
One in all these developments is the topic of this dissertation. Extra exactly, I suggest that the interior Russian info house is used to check narratives earlier than they’re deployed in Russian info operations. Such a mechanism could be particularly efficient towards the international locations of the post-Soviet house. These states are usually extra weak to Russian info operations because of the presence of ethnic minorities, in addition to a shared historic reminiscence with Russia that’s simple to take advantage of for manipulative functions.
To discover the viability of this speculation, I’ll current the case of the Richard Lugar Middle for Public Well being Analysis (Lugar Lab) in Tbilisi, Georgia. In the course of the COVID-19 disaster in 2020, a story was deployed first in Russia after which in Georgia, alleging the involvement of the laboratory within the creation and spreading of the COVID-19 virus as a part of US organic warfare towards Russia. By an in depth evaluation of this case, I hope as an instance the idea of the Russian info house as a testing floor for info operations. I exploit the time period “info operations” all through the dissertation as a result of it’s inclusive of every part which may type a part of such an operation from Russia. Info operations within the Russian understanding embody every part from network-based actions, affect campaigns, intelligence, financial actions, deception, elite corruption, particular operations, and many others. (Giles, 2016), and are aimed toward altering the general public consciousness of the adversary populations in methods advantageous to Russia. Regardless of the shift away from such terminology in Western literature after 2016, I deem it helpful, because it offers the mandatory scope to know operations as a complete.
Within the following part, I’ll summarise the important thing options of post-Crimea literature to focus on the extra substantial consideration paid to the final understanding of Russian info operations. Following the 2016 shift throughout the area, I’ll slender my focus to the research that make the connection between the Russian inner info house and Russian info operations. To be able to discover this connection, I’ll elaborate on my speculation. The similarity of strategies between Russian inner informational management and Russian info operations, administrative ties, and the logical rationale behind testing narratives earlier than deploying them overseas characterize the important thing parts. To focus on how this mechanism of testing may function, the case of the Lugar Lab will serve for instance.
The goal of this dissertation is to not show conclusively that this mechanism exists. It’s as an instance the potential for conducting additional, probably extra quantitative analysis on this specific query, in addition to the final matter of how the Russian info house is used and interacts with Russian info operations. An understanding of those phenomena would undoubtedly assist in detecting, counteracting, or stopping altogether Russian actions that goal to take advantage of divides inside societies to additional Russia’s targets. From the theoretical perspective, the dissertation goals to widen the scope of current analysis on the connection between the Russian info house and Russian info operations.
Literature on the Crimean Operation
The Crimean info operation was perceived as extraordinarily profitable, even paradigm-shifting inside NATO (McIntosh, 2016). Therefore, the goal of the literature on the operation was to achieve a deep understanding of Russian info warfare and be capable of react to related operations sooner or later. This being the widespread matter, a number of widespread options stand out: 1) a seek for a typical logic to those operations in Russian-language theoretical items on info warfare and strategic paperwork of the Russian Federation; 2) a seek for historic precedent and analogues with Soviet operations in addition to ideas comparable to “lively measures” or “reflexive management principle”; 3) an try to focus on the distinction from Soviet “particular propaganda” and present Russian info operations, particularly ideologically and technologically; 4) documenting and disproving the narratives deployed in operations; and 5) anticipating what may occur sooner or later and tips on how to counteract such operations.
In one of many first examples, Jolanta Darczewska (2014) makes an attempt to uncover the objective of data warfare in Russian doctrine. This objective is situated in exerting psychological affect on adversary societies in accordance with the pursuits of the Russian state. To contextualise this objective, Darczewska analyses the philosophical underpinnings of data warfare from the “Dugin” and “Panarin” colleges of thought. Each depend on the idea of societal confrontation between “Western” values and their “Eurasian” counterpart. Info warfare is considered as historic by each Panarin and Dugin, fought between the “West” and totally different iterations of the Russian state. The primary distinction between Soviet occasions and the current is in technique (i.e. mass communication applied sciences) and never goals or technique. Such an all-encompassing conceptualisation situations the continuing nature of Russian info warfare in principle and in observe.
Thus, Darczewska’s paper seems to be to philosophy to establish the goals of the operations (1), tries to find the origins of current doctrine and practices within the Soviet previous (2), nevertheless it additionally pays consideration to the technological and ideological adjustments since then (3). Narrative evaluation focuses on the “Dugin community”, a set of on-line communities curated by the thinker (4). Lastly, the article notes that the annexation of Crimea follows from Russian strategic paperwork, the appliance of Soviet strategies within the fashionable context, and calls to restrict the house of Russian info operations by disproving their narratives (5).
One other paper by Darczewska (2015) is dedicated to the evaluation of the Navy Doctrine of the Russian Federation of December 2014 (1). Darczewska argues that the brand new doctrine inscribes the teachings of the Crimean operation in Russian doctrine. The primary takeaway is that info has became a weapon and must be handled as such. This conclusion is attributed to Russian “strategic tradition”, that’s, the conspiratorial worldview of the Russian military-political elite, searching for whole management at house and efficient instruments of confrontation overseas, in fixed opposition to and beneath assault from Western values searching for to destroy Russia (2, 3). Such a conceptualisation makes Russian info warfare basically incomparable with its Western counterpart, the main target of which is proscribed to concrete navy operations, and never confrontations of civilisational magnitude. As such, Western ideas shouldn’t be utilized when analysing Russian info operations (5).
Lange-Ionatamisvili’s 2015 paper is targeted on “strategic narratives”, translating the conspiratorial worldview outlined above. The writer locates these narratives in strategic paperwork from 2007-2009 (1). The primary narratives may be summarised because the “protection of the Russian info house from NATO”, the defence of “compatriots” (Russian-speaking minorities in international locations of the Former Soviet Union), and the consolidation of the Russkiy Mir ideology, searching for to broaden Russia’s rightful affect over the post-Soviet house (4). Lange-Ionatamisvili identifies Russia’s strategies as a completely new type of warfare that the West is unprepared for (5). Present methods, such because the management over inner media, are recognized as a continuation of Soviet observe and are contrasted with the brand new state ideology of the Russkiy mir, in addition to novel domains of confrontation comparable to on-line mass media (2, 3).
In sharp distinction, Maurer and Janz (2014) focus completely on operations within the cyber area, that’s, the vulnerabilities of the infrastructure that channels info (TV networks, web cables, cellphone operators, knowledge storage centres, and many others.). This paper highlights the issue in reconciling the all-encompassing nature of Russian info warfare with the a lot narrower, network-centric interpretations of NATO. The authors name on NATO to outline its threshold for the activation of the collective protection clause of the Washington Treaty in case of an “info assault” as a response to the rising type of Russian info warfare (5).
Snegovaya (2015) accentuates the Soviet origins of current Russian info warfare strategies. The primary focus is the Soviet idea of “reflexive management principle”, designed to pressure the adversary to behave in methods advantageous to the attacker (1). Therefore, Snegovaya deems the discourse round Moscow’s new informational capabilities as a part of a reflexive management marketing campaign, designed to discourage the West from response (2). As a result of these judgements, the writer merely calls to reexamine counter-reactions to Soviet info operations (5). Snegovaya additionally tries to focus on the ineffectiveness of Russian info operations, citing the restricted attain of propaganda shops comparable to RT and Sputnik (3, 4), in addition to the restricted convergence between Western public opinion and Russian narratives about Crimea.
Pomerantsev’s 2015 article is an outlier. It locates the supply and effectiveness of Russian info operations within the inner Russian info house. The important thing component of this effectiveness is expressed within the full management of the Presidential Administration (PA) over most channels of inner media. The PA administers a system described as a “extremely developed trade of political manipulation” (p.42), propagating “partaking, sensationist drama” (p. 41). In line with Pomerantsev, the Kremlin’s targets don’t differ relating to inner and exterior operations. It’s all the time to blur actuality sufficient in order that the idea of fact itself turns into suspicious (1). Such a technique helps undermine social cohesion in all international locations, together with Russia, and exacerbates current societal tensions. The answer proposed by the writer is to provide you with extra compelling and truthful narratives in comparison with those propagated by the Kremlin (5). By establishing the similarity of the strategies used for inner informational management and external-facing info operations, the writer additionally calls to consideration the elevated ideological house of Russian info warfare in comparison with Soviet practices based mostly on communist concepts (2, 3).
The 2015 publication of Sazonov, Müür and Mödler by the NATO Strategic Communication Centre of Excellence was produced in mild of the 2014 Navy Doctrine of the Russian Federation. The gathering of essays relies across the idea of “Info Superiority”. Info Superiority is outlined as using informational actions throughout peacetime with a view to scale back the combating capabilities of the adversary. Such an idea follows straight from the so-called Gerasimov doctrine of 2013 (Gerasimov, 2013), which argues that management over info is the driving pressure of recent warfare. Thus, the paper units out to analyse how this idea of data superiority was applied throughout and after the Crimean operation, in addition to what countermeasures may be taken by NATO in future battle situations with Russia (1, 5).
The implementation of this idea depends on Russia’s management over details about itself, which permits it to create manipulative narratives about its previous and current. These narratives type a part of the fashionable Russian state’s ideology (Russkiy mir/Russian world) that represents Russia as a separate, particular civilisation based mostly on parts from the imperial previous, japanese Orthodoxy and the concept of Moscow because the Third Rome, the Soviet empire (2), in addition to the Russian ethnos’s particular position in civilising and ruling over the remainder of Eurasia. To implement this ideology, two ideas type the premise of Russia’s info warfare doctrine. One is that this particular civilisation is beneath fixed assault and therefore should be defended, the opposite is that the simplest means to do that is by way of the knowledge house. These ideas are elaborated by theorists of Russian info warfare, comparable to Chekinov, Bogdanov, Semenov, Bukharin, and Gareev (1). Their arguments converge on the concept that info is extra highly effective than weapons, therefore it should lead and never observe kinetic warfare. This, nonetheless, requires longer implementation and attracts Russia into fixed info warfare to attain its goals. The primary technique within the operation towards Ukraine was the crafting and spreading of narratives based mostly on historic reminiscence that portrayed the Authorities of Ukraine as Nazis, Fascists, a Junta, unlawful, or Russophobic. The paper analyses how these narratives had been propagated in numerous varieties by way of a tabloid newspaper, the official TV channel of the Ministry of Defence of Russia and an analytical web site to cater to totally different audiences, each in Russia and in Ukraine (4). A Fb group can be examined to analyse the significance of the comparatively novel area of social media campaigns (3). The authors suggest extra thorough historic training on Russia with a view to scale back the effectiveness of misleading historic narratives (5).
András Rácz and Katri Pynnöniemi (2016) start by finding the roots of data operations practices and principle within the custom of Soviet lively measures (1, 2). Additional, the examine presents metanarratives of Russian info warfare towards Ukraine. An important ones are the labelling of the Kyiv authorities as a Junta, Fascists, Nazis, Banderovtsy, and a menace to the Russian world (4). The general goal of such metanarratives is outlined as discrediting any resistance to Russia’s overseas coverage pursuits, blaming the battle on the Ukrainian authorities, representing the separatist fighters as freedom fighters and Russia as a easy passive bystander (1). What’s revolutionary concerning the paper is that it additionally investigates and analyses these metanarratives utilized in info operations towards eight different international locations (Germany, Estonia, Finland, Sweden, Hungary, Poland, Czechia, and Slovakia). By taking such an strategy, the examine established the additional improvement of the sphere, inasmuch as country-specific evaluation of Russian info operations turns into ubiquitous after this preliminary section of literature. Moreover, it additionally establishes the connection between the Russian info house that produces these narratives and Russian info operations that regulate and deploy them towards totally different international locations (5).
Lastly, the NATO Handbook of Russian Info Warfare (Giles, 2016) represents the fruits of the primary section of research. The goal of the e-book is to ascertain a baseline for additional analysis on the topic. As such, most of it’s devoted to offering widespread terminology and instructions for additional examine. Most significantly, the e-book interprets the Russian idea of data warfare into related NATO disciplines (1, 2, 3), defining it because the sum of pc community operations, psychological operations, strategic communications, intelligence, counterintelligence, disinformation, deception, digital warfare, and extra. Consistent with this thought, the e-book highlights the hazards of making use of NATO ideas to Russian actions. The basic objective of Russian info warfare is outlined as influencing the consciousness of adversary populations to attain Russia’s strategic targets (1). The significance of the “defence” of the Russian info house in Russian doctrine can be elaborated. To offer context, the historical past of the event of the current idea of data warfare is summarised (2). A chapter is devoted to the latest strategies utilized in info operations, comparable to troll farms which can be used to amplify narratives on social media and the web (3). Lastly, the e-book tries to anticipate the shape that future operations may take for corresponding analysis and design of countermeasures. These embody extra frequent covert affect actions within the on-line house, sabotage assaults on communication infrastructure, the convergence between fields of exercise which can be historically thought of to be separate (intelligence, media, navy), in addition to extra subtle focusing on of inhabitants teams and even particular personnel (5).
Shifts within the area post-2016
After 2016, there was a noticeable change within the examine of Russian info operations. An vital issue behind this modification is demonstrated within the NATO Handbook of Russian Info Warfare: finding out this area in a complete means requires a spread of data that’s merely uncommon.
Moreover, the Russian interference within the 2016 US presidential election expanded the scope of the studied topics from Ukraine and the previous Warsaw Pact international locations to the remainder of the world. As a consequence, scholarship splintered geographically, requiring native language information for every particular nation/area.
Furthermore, the 2 parts of the 2016 interference within the US election revealed an additional divide. The hacking of the Democratic Nationwide Conference was analysed as a cybersecurity incident, which was interpreted as separate from the opposite a part of the knowledge operation. The second course was based mostly on the disinformation marketing campaign on Twitter, particularly the investigation of affect operations by means of media campaigns. An instance of investigating cyber exercise is the examine of the Stanford Web Observatory (Diresta and Grossman, 2019, pp. 3-99) on Russian navy intelligence-curated (GRU) faux organisations and personas. An instance of investigating affect campaigns is the StopFake mission and its steady analysis on disinformation operations.[2]
In an try and bridge the post-2016 geographical-thematic divides, I’ll conceptualise the position of the Russian info house in Russian info operations. The following part will set up the connection between the 2 entities by means of the dialogue of instances the place narratives had been utilized in each the Russian and a overseas info house. This connection was talked about fairly steadily within the literature associated to Crimea as a result of it’s instantly obvious. The primary avenue for Russian narratives into the knowledge house of different international locations throughout the first section of literature was Russian state tv. This was potential because the studied international locations are virtually completely from the post-Soviet house, and lots of of them had been translating Russian state tv at the moment. (examples embody, for Latvia, Berzina, 2016, pp. 171-205; and for Ukraine, Snegovaya, 2015, pp. 18-22). Although a few of these direct avenues had been eliminated after 2014 (Snegovaya, 2015, p. 19; Stolze, 2022, pp. 7-8), the observe of utilizing internally targeted narratives in info operations towards post-Soviet international locations didn’t stop.
Traditionally manipulative narratives based mostly across the Russian/Soviet victory within the Second World Warfare additionally continued to be deployed each in addressing the Russian inhabitants and towards Estonia, Finland, Poland, and Latvia (Juurvee, 2020). “Info laundering”—outlined because the gradual distortion of an authentic supply and its subsequent dissemination—turned one of many practices of delivering Russian narratives to diasporas overseas, particularly after the restrictive measures on extra direct avenues following the 2022 full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine (Stolze, 2022, pp. 4-36). The Baltnews Telegram channel continued to relate the conflict from the Russian perspective to the ethnic minorities of the Baltic republics, typically citing statements from Russian official our bodies, disguising their true supply by means of proxy shops.
Russian info operations towards Georgia make for a very fruitful instance (Lange-Ionatamisvili, McMillan). Russia targets Georgia’s info house by means of proxies, since overtly pro-Russian narratives are unpopular (pp. 38-39). Nonetheless, the similarity between the narratives used inside Russian and towards Georgia is placing. A frequent Russian narrative contrasts “decadent Western values” with “Conservative and Orthodox Georgian (Russian)” ones, exploiting extraordinary Georgians’ concern of modernisation. One other instance is framing Georgia’s ties to NATO as destabilising, which performs on the nation’s historic insecurity, exacerbated by the 2008 conflict with Russia. NATO as aggressive and destabilising is without doubt one of the key concepts of Russian President Vladimir Putin, since no less than 2007 (Putin, 2007). The protection of conventional values can be a key tenet of recent Russian state ideology, highlighting how narratives used internally are additionally utilized in info operations.
In conclusion, the identical narratives are sometimes used for each inner Russian audiences and knowledge operations overseas. The implications of this connection are explored beneath.
Thesis define
Regardless of the truth that the connection between the Russian info house and Russian info operations is documented, the potential implications of this connection are hitherto left unexplored. I may find no publications that tackle this specific difficulty, suggesting that the phenomenon is both assumed to haven’t any significance or it has not been studied but. The current dissertation makes an attempt to problem this assumption and begin filling this hole. I’ll attempt to reveal that one of many features of the Russian info house in info operations towards post-Soviet international locations could possibly be that of testing the narratives earlier than they’re deployed in dwell operations. Thus, the speculation of the dissertation may be formulated thus: Narratives employed in info operations towards post-Soviet international locations are examined throughout the Russian info house.
There are a number of elements that make such a speculation credible. To begin with, the international locations of the post-Soviet house are particularly weak to narratives which can be additionally used towards the Russian inhabitants. In most of them, a big part of the inhabitants speaks the Russian language and receives info from Russian information sources straight or by means of acquaintances. Ukraine, Latvia, and Estonia stand out, as in these international locations, the Russian-speaking inhabitants can be a semi-marginalised ethnic minority, and therefore much more receptive in direction of narratives hostile to its house state (Kuprashvili, 2021, p. 58). Moreover, Russia’s “Compatriots” overseas coverage initiative (Zakem et al., 2015, pp. 37-45) offers a set of avenues for info operations by means of state-curated NGOs. These organisations work on strengthening the Russian state’s ties to ethnic Russian or Russian-speaking minorities overseas, and are extremely efficient at spreading the Kremlin’s narratives. Furthermore, shared historic reminiscence between the Russian inhabitants and these teams offers fruitful floor for info operations as a result of its emotional content material and its potential for manipulation (Juurvee et al., 2020). Thus, these situations produce an unusually permissive setting (Giles, 2016, pp. 22-26) for Russian info operations.
Moreover, the Russian state equipment deploys an identical methods to attain inner informational management as in info operations. Internally, troll factories serve to distort impressions of well-liked opinion on-line, whereas the far more superior and ideologically charged technique of “littering of the knowledge house”, offers partaking however deceptive content material in giant quantities that makes it unattainable to tell apart between fact and falsehood Kiriya (2021, pp. 16-26). The same “firehose of falsehoods” technique (Paul and Matthews, 2016, pp. 1-11) is utilized in external-facing info operations. The important thing options of this technique are described as: “1. Excessive-volume and multichannel 2. Fast, steady, and repetitive 3. Lacks dedication to goal actuality 4. Lacks dedication to consistency” (p. 2). These two methods end in very related content material, each when it comes to high quality and quantity.
Such similarities shouldn’t be shocking. First, based on Russian info warfare principle, controlling Russia’s info house and exercising exterior informational affect are the parts of the identical general technique (Thomas, 1998). As such, the organisations answerable for inner propaganda and knowledge operations are greatest conceptualised as a part of the identical, extremely centralised administrative construction. On the head of this construction is the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation, directing every participant of those actions, together with the nation’s fundamental media holdings, NGOs, journalistic shops, digital media, in addition to the Particular Companies (Kuzichkin and Hanley, 2021, pp. 13-31).
A latest incident serves to focus on this interconnectedness. Following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, a lot of the infrastructure of the Particular Companies used for info operations throughout the European Union was dismantled. This included many media organisations, brokers of affect, diplomats, digital companies infrastructure, cash laundering schemes, and so forth. As a result of this lack of capabilities, a profound restructuring happened throughout the companies to switch the misplaced infrastructure in addition to enhance coordination between the totally different branches of the knowledge operations equipment. This restructuring was led by Sergei Kirienko, deputy head of the Presidential Administration (Watling, Danylyuk and Reynolds 2024, pp. 8-9). Kirienko’s common portfolio is Russian home politics, together with media and propaganda (Pertsev, 2022; Insikt Group, 2022, pp. 4-5). Thus, the individual in control of inner propaganda has additionally performed the main position in reorganising info operations capabilities, highlighting the coalescence between the administration of inner and external-facing info operations.
One other issue supporting the speculation is that testing narratives internally would assist decide their effectiveness earlier than they’re deployed. Measuring the impression of data operations is an issue as previous because the self-discipline itself, which has change into much more acute with the transfer into the web house (Rid, 2020, pp. 429-432). For instance, the Twitter disinformation marketing campaign throughout the 2016 US presidential elections turned out to not have had any severe impact in and of itself regardless of the preliminary apprehension following its discovery (Rid, 2020, pp. 403-409; Eady, Paskhalis, and Zilinsky et al., 2023). This preliminary error in impression measurement is partially attributable to the truth that the US info house is tough to delineate and is so risky that isolating the consequences of a story on public opinion is subsequent to unattainable. In distinction, the Russian info house’s particular traits make such impression measurements potential. The Russian info house is extraordinarily properly managed. By 2019, near 90% of data content material inside Russia was produced by simply three firms, all beneath the direct or oblique possession of the state and course of the Presidential Administration (Kuzichkin and Hanley, 2021, p. 13). The Russian info house can be intently surveyed. The Kremlin makes use of public opinion surveys to evaluate the effectiveness of narratives propagated by means of conventional and social media channels, and to focus on and regulate them accordingly (Rogov and Ananyev, 2019, pp. 210-212). This potential to gauge the effectiveness of any given narrative and regulate it as wanted significantly mitigates the measurement drawback that’s in any other case inherent to info operations. Lastly, within the case of the post-Soviet international locations, narrative testing is feasible internally since sure sections of the Russian inhabitants have their shut equivalents in post-Soviet international locations. That is based mostly on their related training, age, language, habits of consuming info, in addition to the shared historic reminiscence, as mentioned beforehand. This offers the Kremlin with the mandatory target market at house to check its narratives earlier than utilizing them towards post-Soviet states.
To summarise, the elements that make potential the testing of narratives utilized in Russian info operations towards post-Soviet states are: 1) the precise traits of the Russian info house, 2) the position of the Presidential Administration in managing each inner informational management and knowledge operations, 3) the following similarity of utilized methods, 4) the worth of preliminary suggestions on the effectiveness of narratives earlier than deployment, and 4) corresponding inhabitants teams in Russian and post-Soviet states. As an instance how this testing mechanism may work in observe, the case of the Lugar Lab in Georgia is examined beneath.
The knowledge house
So as to have the ability to see whether or not the narrative was examined within the Russian info house earlier than getting used within the Georgian, it is very important draw the road between the 2. There are a number of theories of the Russian info house that could possibly be utilized right here. The territorial strategy focuses on entities throughout the state’s borders. The technological strategy concentrates on infrastructural objects. The social strategy analyses social relations between the producers and shoppers of data. The evolutionary strategy sees the knowledge house within the theoretical constructions which can be used to course of info by the human thoughts, and the Noöspheric strategy describes the whole merger of the organic and psychological spheres as the knowledge house (Kovaleva, 2018, pp. 137-141). This dissertation will undertake a mixture of the “territorial” and the “social” approaches, since these are the 2 ideas which can be utilized in Russian strategic paperwork. Thus, the Russian info house is conceptualised alongside two key elements: territory and target market. Therefore, for a supply of data to be thought of “contained in the Russian info house” and probably used for testing, it’ll bodily should be inside Russia. It should additionally should be beneath the direct or oblique management of the Presidential Administration (PA) to ensure that deliberate testing to be conceptually potential.[3] Moreover, the meant target market of the supply may even should be inner. That is vital to state since many shops beneath the PA’s management comparable to RT or Sputnik are beneath the identical editorial, monetary, and political oversight, however they tackle audiences outdoors Russia (Kuzichkin and Hanley, 2021, pp. 13-30).
To summarise, the Russian info house is constituted by sources of data which can be bodily based mostly in Russia and are addressed to inner Russian audiences, combining for a territorial-social strategy. Sources of data which can be beneath the management of the PA however tackle exterior audiences is not going to be thought of for testing, however they’re paid consideration to as amplification units for Russian narratives in overseas info areas.
Accordingly, I’ll element the case of Lugar Lab as an illustration of the testing mechanism. The narratives used within the operation had been extracted from secondary literature after which traced again to their preliminary inner supply. The mechanism of “testing” is taken into account to be ongoing between the looks of a particular narrative within the Russian info house and the looks of the narrative within the info house of the goal nation (Georgia). Additional testing can be potential whereas the operation is already dwell, with a view to make changes to the narrative. Therefore, it’s anticipated that the narrative is not going to disappear from the Russian info house after its first deployment in Georgia. A chronological restrict can be utilized. The examined interval begins on the twentieth of January 2020 and ends on the twenty ninth of September 2020. This is because of the truth that some info operations utilizing the identical narrative proceed for years, if not a long time (Rid, 2020, p. 180). Such a timeframe is past the scope of this dissertation.
The restrictions of this system must also be famous. The idea of narrative testing is introduced by means of a single case examine. Consequently, it shouldn’t be thought of to be confirmed, even when all the standards outlined above are met. A a lot bigger pattern dimension could be required to make such conclusions. Moreover, no “direct” proof can be offered that the mechanism recognized as “narrative testing” exists.[4] Its principle relies on observations of how Russian info operations are performed, the sensible advantages of testing narratives, and the present infrastructure that makes testing potential. Therefore the next case examine is supposed as an illustration of what the testing mechanism may appear to be. Maybe extra importantly, it’s meant to supply the place to begin for additional analysis on this concrete idea, in addition to on the interactions between the Russian info house and Russian info operations, hitherto left unexamined.
Case examine: COVID-19 emerged from the Lugar Laboratory in Georgia
Context
The Richard Lugar Middle for Public Well being Analysis (henceforth Lugar Lab) is a organic analysis centre situated in Tbilisi, Georgia. It was constructed in cooperation with the US Division of Defence from 2004 to 2011, and it has been operational since August 2013. The primary narrative of Russian info operations in regards to the Lugar Lab has been Washington’s alleged use of the ability for organic warfare towards Russia, ongoing ever since 2013 (Bolkvadze, 2021, p. 44; Ghvedashvili, 2021, p. 102; see additionally the instance in be aware [5]). For instance, a high-profile operation was performed towards the Lugar Lab in 2018. Igor Giorgadze, former Minister of State Safety of Georgia, alleged that an unlicensed drug towards Hepatitis C offered by the US was examined on Georgian civilians on the laboratory, a lot of whom had died as a consequence. This story was run by Russian fundamental tv channels, in addition to Russia-leaning shops in Georgia (IDFI, 2020). Variations of the narrative have additionally been amplified on the official degree. In 2018, the radiation, chemical, and organic protection models of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation began investigating “the suspicious unfold” of Congo-Crimean haemorrhagic fever, allegedly unfold from the Lugar Lab utilizing contaminated bugs (BBC Monitoring, 2018). The continued nature of those operations means that the Lugar Lab was assessed within the Kremlin as a very potent object for info operations. With the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, this efficiency was duly exploited.
The operation
On the 26th of January, REN TV, a Russian federal tv channel, ran a narrative referred to as “Mutation, Secret Laboratory or Provocation: The place did the coronavirus come from” (REN TV 2020). The textual content initially mentioned COVID’s doubtless origins in Wuhan and the potential leak from the organic laboratory within the metropolis. Afterwards, the outlet cites feedback from Igor Nikulin, “navy knowledgeable and former member of the fee on organic weapons to the UN”, saying that it’s doubtless that the US has artificially created COVID-19. To assist this thesis, Nikulin cites the US’s obvious curiosity in wiping out the Chinese language inhabitants. He additionally highlights the presence of American “navy laboratories” worldwide, with out offering any concrete proof for his claims.[6] Proper after Nikulin’s feedback concerning the US having made the virus in its navy labs, REN TV mentions the Lugar Lab as a kind of websites. Thus, the narrative alleging that COVID-19 was made by American navy docs within the “Laboratory of Dying” (Vesti, 2018)[7] was born. REN TV’s story represents the insertion of the narrative into the Russian info house. Moreover, REN TV’s 900,000-strong viewers on the day of publication (Mediascope, 2020) offered the chance for the Presidential Administration to see whether or not this narrative was efficient in engulfing the laboratory doubtful. In line with the idea of narrative testing, the narrative proved environment friendly and was prepared for export to Georgia.
One of many first appearances of the narrative got here from an surprising supply. The Georgian counter-disinformation outlet “Mythdetector.ge” revealed a report on the REN TV emission in Georgian, Russian, and English, debunking its key theses on the identical day it appeared. This publication implies that an info assault on the Lugar Lab was anticipated by the Georgian aspect. The Georgian portal Netgazeti additionally revealed an article debunking the narrative, with the pinnacle of the Lugar Lab, Paata Imnadze, calling it Russian propaganda (BBC monitoring, 2020a). In parallel vogue, the narrative conflating COVID-19 with the Lugar Lab was run various occasions within the Russian info house, commencing on the 6th February (BBC Monitoring, 2020b). This could have offered additional alternatives to the Presidential Administration to check its effectiveness and make the mandatory changes.
Regardless of the “prebunking” inside Georgia, the narrative was inserted into the Georgian info house on the 18th of March. The net platforms “Georgia and World” and “NewsFront Georgia”—each frequent conduits of Kremlin info operations—revealed the narrative in Georgian, utilizing virtually an identical texts (Mythdetector, 2020; Bilanishvili, 2020). On the 24th of March, an interview from the outlet Saqinform additionally conflated the Lugar lab with the emergence of COVID, calling the virus a organic weapon (Saqinform, 2020). The interview was given to “NewsFront Georgia” by the editor-in-chief of Saqinform, Arno Khidirbegishvili. In two just about an identical interviews with the identical contributors, the narrative barely altered. It was now alleged that COVID-19 was created particularly towards the populations of the previous USSR. This time, nonetheless, it was additionally strengthened by co-opting feedback from the Nobel-laureate biologist Luc Montagnier, who claimed that COVID-19 may need been manipulated by including genes of HIV to it (Saqinform, 2020). Conveniently, the narrative of HIV being an American organic weapon is without doubt one of the most well-known Soviet info operations (Rid, 2020, pp. 299-311), which made for a exceptional comeback. Saqinform equally took benefit of the feedback of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Workers of the USA, Mike Milley (Saqinform, 2020), stating that the US Military couldn’t exclude the synthetic nature of COVID.
All three shops (Georgia and World, Saqinform, and NewsFront Georgia) publish each in Russian and in Georgian. This will increase their attain to Georgia’s ethnic minority populations, the place often Russian and the native language (Azeri, Armenian) are the one ones spoken. With no entry to Georgian information sources, these teams are extra weak to hostile narratives of this type (Chachava, 2021, p.75). Based mostly on the publishing shops and the language of the publications, the narrative had two principal goal audiences: Russia-leaning/anti-Western Georgian political forces and ethnic minority populations. These are the teams that narratives examined inside Russia could possibly be greatest used towards, since they’ve their shut equivalents inside Russia when it comes to worldview, historic reminiscence, and political concepts. This primary section of the operation has sown the seeds of doubt inside related inhabitants teams towards the actions of the Lugar Lab associated to COVID-19. Now it was time to escalate.
On the 17th of April, Russian Overseas Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova elevated the narrative to the official degree. She declared that it can’t be dominated out that the Individuals on the Lab are conducting “work to create and modify numerous infectious brokers of harmful diseases, together with for navy functions” (BBC Monitoring, 2020c). These statements surged right into a diplomatic disagreement between the 2 international locations (BBC Monitoring, 2020d). Importantly, utilizing the Overseas Ministry as a channel meant that the narrative may now not be ignored. It had made it into the mainstream. Lending such authority to those claims gave the impetus essential for the operation to proceed its work of producing distrust in direction of the work of the Lugar Lab within the focused inhabitants teams. Correspondingly, “Georgia and World” rehashed the narrative in barely totally different varieties 5 occasions between the 26th of April and the 27th of August 2020 (Georgia and World, 2020). The narrative was additionally stored lively within the info house of Russia. The favored tabloid Komsomolskaya Pravda mentioned it on the 30th of April (BBC Monitoring, 2020e).[8] The diplomatic marketing campaign additionally continued all through the summer time. The Russian aspect demanded full entry to the lab on 27th of Might (Interfax, 2020). The Georgian aspect promptly agreed on the 28th of Might, as a part of a world mission (TASS, 2020), which didn’t materialise ultimately.
South Ossetia, the Russia-backed separatist area of Georgia, offered one other axis of the operation. On the 29th of February, solely three days after the primary case of the virus was confirmed in Georgia, the Safety Service of the self-proclaimed republic conflated the Lugar Lab with the unfold of COVID-19 (KGB RYuO, 2020), based mostly on the laboratory’s geographical proximity to South Ossetia. The Service additionally referred to as the Lugar Lab a “menace to the whole Caucasus area” (BBC Monitoring, 2020f), thus trying to discredit its actions in relation to COVID-19. On the 28th of April, the South-Ossetian marketing campaign mirrored the escalation of the Russian Overseas Ministry. The Safety Service mentioned the unfold of the virus in adjoining Georgian areas, then said that the most important concern concerning the spreading of COVID-19 is brought on by the Lugar Lab, implying that the virus is from there and is being actively unfold by the laboratory (KGB RYuO, 2020).
The narrative reached its pinnacle on the 9th of June, when the Safety Service accused the “American curators” of the laboratory of tasking the Georgian personnel with the creation of viruses able to the exact an infection of the South Ossetian inhabitants and ethnic group (KGB RYuO, 2020). This declaration was reported by Sputnik South Ossetia (Sputnik, 2020), and some different shops of regional significance. That is almost certainly as a result of the truth that such a brazen model was meant completely for the South Ossetian inhabitants, and therefore not amplified by bigger Russian/Georgian shops.
On the 1st of September, the Georgian Ministry of Well being suffered a cyberattack, aimed toward stealing knowledge associated to the Lugar Lab. The assault was blamed on Russian Particular Companies on the 4th of September by the Inside Ministry of Georgia (BBC Monitoring, 2020g). Overseas Minister Davit Zalkaliani virtually instantly recognized the assault as a part of the continuing disinformation marketing campaign (BBC Monitoring, 2020h), trying to pre-empt the consequences of any narratives based mostly on actual or made-up knowledge acquired concerning the Lugar Lab. The aim and results of this assault are tough to guage, since no stolen knowledge was utilized in Russian info operations because it occurred. This can be as a result of the intruders didn’t discover helpful knowledge, or as a result of the aim of the assault was merely to lend credence to earlier (and future) claims coming from the Russian aspect, in addition to to showcase Russian cyber energy towards the “American navy biolab”. Russian media mentioned the incident solely passingly.[9]
Lastly, this particular narrative blended again into the final Russian marketing campaign round US organic laboratories on overseas soil. On the 29th of September, Nikolay Patrushev, the secretary of the Russian Safety Council, voiced the hazards of US biolabs within the post-Soviet house on the assembly of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. This warning was reapplied to the Lugar Lab by Sputnik South Ossetia (2020), rehashing their earlier claims concerning the laboratory and COVID-19. This text concludes the examined interval of the operation. Nonetheless, related narratives towards the Lugar Lab continued to seem and can almost certainly have future iterations. For instance, the South Ossetian Safety Service accused the lab of spreading swine flu in July 2021 (Mythdetector, 2021) and of potential bioterrorism in February 2022 (Civil.ge, 2022).
Abstract
Total, the case of this operation illustrates the speculation of the dissertation in addition to among the dynamics of Russian info operations described within the literature evaluation. The narrative of the Lugar Lab being a part of American organic warfare towards Russia and the post-Soviet states has been distinguished since earlier than 2020. The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic and the uncertainty round it created the setting to resume the operation.
Therefore, the narrative of COVID having been created on the lab was invented by REN TV on the 26th of January 2020. The federal attain offered by the channel created the situations to check if the narrative resonated with related part of the Russian inhabitants. Afterward, the narrative was inserted into the Georgian info house by means of platforms with goal audiences which have equivalents inside Russia and are weak to such manipulations. The operation was escalated on the 17th of April by way of the Russian Overseas Ministry, coming into the mainstream. The operation was stored alive and repeated by the related actors each in Russia and in Georgia. On the 28th of April, self-proclaimed South Ossetia additionally entered the fray. The Safety Service of the republic claimed that the Individuals had been tasking the Georgian lab with creating bioweapons able to exterminating the republic’s inhabitants. This model of the narrative was amplified by Kremlin shops comparable to Sputnik. Lastly, a cyberattack was levied towards the Georgian Well being Ministry, aimed toward stealing knowledge associated to the Lugar Lab. The outcomes of this assault are to date unclear, however knowledge stolen may be used towards the laboratory sooner or later. Whereas it’s tough to speak concerning the outcomes of the operation, a public opinion survey from 2021 confirmed that about one-third of Georgia’s inhabitants was unsure concerning the nature of the work of the laboratory (Chachava, 2021, p. 66). Thus, it’s secure to say that the narrative was efficient in creating doubt concerning the laboratory and its usefulness, even when the narrative about it producing bioweapons was not accepted by most.
Conclusion
The goal of this dissertation was to analyse how Russian info operations have been studied so far, and the way they could possibly be studied additional. The invigoration of academia following the Crimean operation in 2014 introduced the eye of students from many disciplines to the topic. This resulted in a seek for the interior logic of Russian info operations, continuities with and variations from Soviet observe, and theories of what future operations may appear to be. Within the wake of the intervention of the Russian Particular Companies into the US presidential elections in 2016, the scope of the sphere was globalised. This geographical splintering led to a lower in deal with normal developments and inner logic, attribute of the earlier wave of literature. The Russian info house acquired little consideration, and was studied on a case-by-case foundation, not comprehensively. Moreover, its features in info operations have but to be correctly theorised. To start this work, I argued that the Russian info house is used to check the narratives of data operations earlier than they’re deployed towards the international locations of the post-Soviet house. To assist this argument, I analysed the structural similarities of Russian info operations and techniques of inner informational management. I additionally introduced the position of the Presidential Administration in directing each of those actions. Taking the angle of the Russian Particular Companies, I highlighted the potential advantages of narrative testing, in addition to the provision of the infrastructure to take action. By the case of the Lugar Lab, I aimed to supply an instance of what narrative testing may appear to be in observe.
The strategies employed for this analysis go away room for enchancment. First, the minimal pattern dimension prevents drawing normal conclusions. Additional instances should be studied to verify or discard this principle. Moreover, no direct proof could possibly be offered to show that the phenomenon noticed is certainly testing and never one thing else. The speculation depends on the commentary of developments and the logical deduction of the desirability of narrative testing for info warfare operators. Furthermore, the same methods between inner informational management and knowledge in addition to the interconnectedness of the executive our bodies that govern them must be explored in additional element. Lastly, the sources used to trace potential testing actions must be widened: platforms comparable to radio, print press, books, and a wider vary of social media platforms together with personal teams and group chats supply some instructions to pursue.
Nonetheless, the strategy of investigating the connections between the Russian info house and Russian info operations provides a spread of alternatives for additional analysis. The advantages of such analysis are each theoretical and sensible. Theoretically, the strategy of tying these two phenomena collectively and inspecting their relationship provides a wider scope than is presently utilized by the sphere. Virtually, the Russian info house is accessible for commentary. A greater understanding of its position in Russian info operations may assist anticipate and counter such actions, decreasing their effectiveness. The current dissertation hopes to function the place to begin of this new course of analysis.
Notes
[1] Sure caveats should be utilized right here. The queries had been on the 19th January 2024. The numbers describing the interval “after 2014” may need modified as new papers are produced. Moreover, false positives may properly be included in among the searches. Nonetheless, the corpus that’s current on these aggregators is slender sufficient for the searches to supply roughly acceptable numbers. These numbers, regardless of their potential inaccuracies, assist illustrate the development throughout the studied area, and as such, they fulfil their current perform.
[2] A set of related research is accessible right here: https://www.stopfake.org/en/class/information/.
[3] Unbiased info assets that tackle the Russian viewers additionally fall throughout the inner Russian info house, however they can’t be used for testing a story utilized in info operations.
[4] Direct proof could be memorandums from the Presidential Administration or the Secret Companies, directing concrete constructions to conduct the testing of a given narrative. The writer has no information of the existence, not to mention the provision, of such proof.
[5] RIA Novosti (2014): “Anti-Russian viruses within the laboratories of the American “BioPRO” (Антироссийские вирусы в лабораториях американской БиоПРО) https://ria.ru/20140723/1017236855.html.
[6] In distinction, a report from the Related Press and the Digital Forensics Analysis Lab notes Nikulin may by no means have been employed by the UN (AP, 2020). One factor that’s identified is that he has been a really frequent visitor on Russian TV channels, discussing related theories. See: https://www.google.com/search?q=Игорь+Никулин+военный+эксперт.
[7] Russian shops referred to the Lugar Lab because the “Laboratory of Dying” steadily after the 2018 operations. See: https://www.vesti.ru/article/1498355.
[8] For additional evaluation see: Covid-19 Evaluation: Kremlin revives ‘US biolabs’ claims for virus disaster (https://monitoring.bbc.co.uk/product/c201ouu3).
[9] See: https://yandex.ru/search/?textual content=хакерская+на+лабораторию+лугара&lr=10522.
Bibliography
Main sources
BBC monitoring (2018) ‘Russian forces to analyze suspicious ‘epidemics‘’, BBC, 4th December. Accessible at: https://monitoring.bbc.co.uk/product/c200hdyx (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
BBC Monitoring (2020a) ‘Georgian well being official responds to Russian TV’s coronavirus conspiracy’, BBC, 7th February. Accessible at: https://monitoring.bbc.co.uk/product/c201fwa9 (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
BBC Monitoring (2020b) ‘Russian media amplify coronavirus conspiracy theories’, BBC, 6th February. Accessible at: https://monitoring.bbc.co.uk/product/c201ftyb (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
BBC Monitoring (2020c) ‘Covid-19 Evaluation: Kremlin revives ‘US biolabs’ claims for virus disaster’, BBC, 8th Might. Accessible at: https://monitoring.bbc.co.uk/product/c201ouu3 (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
BBC Monitoring (2020d) ‘Covid-19 Geopolitics: Georgia rejects Russian claims on Tbilisi-based bio-lab’, BBC, 18th April. Accessible at: https://monitoring.bbc.co.uk/product/c201mhni (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
BBC Monitoring (2020e) ‘Professional-Kremlin tabloid says US labs at Russian borders put together for organic conflict’, BBC, 30th April. Accessible at: https://monitoring.bbc.co.uk/product/c201oofl (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
BBC Monitoring (2020f) ‘Georgia’s South Ossetia takes measures towards coronavirus’, BBC, 29th February. Accessible at: https://monitoring.bbc.co.uk/product/f201hzlz (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
BBC Monitoring (2020g) ‘Highlights from Georgian press 4 Sep 20’, BBC, 4th September. Accessible at: https://monitoring.bbc.co.uk/product/c20209zv (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
BBC Monitoring (2020h) ‘Covid-19 Geopolitics: Georgian officers blame Russia for well being database hack’, BBC, 4th September. Accessible at: https://monitoring.bbc.co.uk/product/c20209qo (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Buziashvili, E. (2020) Bioweapons, secret labs, and the CIA: pro-Kremlin actors blame the U.S. for coronavirus outbreak. Accessible at: https://medium.com/dfrlab/bioweapons-secret-labs-and-the-cia-pro-kremlin-actors-blame-the-u-s-for-coronavirus-outbreak-ffc2139c28dd (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Civil.ge (2022) Tskhinvali KGB Targets Lugar Middle, U.S. Well being Amenities. Accessible at: https://civil.ge/archives/471025 (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Georgia and World (2020) COVID-19, the Lugar Lab and the empty response of the Georgian FM: The place is the lie? [Covid-19, лаборатория Лугара и ответ-пустышка от МИД Грузии: в чем подвох?] 26th April. Accessible at: https://geworld.ge/ru/covid-19-лаборатория-лугара-и-ответ-пустышка/ (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Georgia and World (2020) Russia should demand the inspection of biolaboratories of the USA at its border [Россия должна требовать инспекций биолабораторий США у своих границ] 1st June. Accessible at: https://geworld.ge/ru/россия-должна-требовать-инспекций-би/ (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Georgia and World (2020) The effectiveness of an entomological weapon is being examined in Armenia – Media [В Армении ведется тестирование эффективности энтомологического оружия — СМИ], 27th Might. Accessible at: https://geworld.ge/ru/в-армении-ведется-тестирование-эффек/ (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Georgia and World (2020) The key biolaboratories of the Pentagon on the borders of Russia – investigation [Секретные биолаборатории Пентагона у границ России: расследование] twenty sixth April. Accessible at: https://geworld.ge/ru/секретные-биолаборатории-пентагона/ (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Georgia and World (2020) Why the Individuals want biolabs in Central Asia and the Caucasus [Зачем американцам биолаборатории в Центральной Азии и на Кавказе] 1st June. Accessible at: https://geworld.ge/ru/зачем-американцам-биолаборатории-в-ц/ (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Institute for Improvement of Freedom of Info (2020) Russian Info Warfare towards the Lugar Laboratory. Accessible at: https://idfi.ge/en/russian_information_war_against_lugar_laboratory?fbclid=IwAR1QjwjDvdtfr6ki8XY9fh7Y3g7l2AYsLBmpWi9SQlQq4OwbPoLEYfCkcn8 (Accessed: 14.03.2024).
Interfax (2020) ‘Moscow calls for that its knowledgeable be allowed into the entire biolaboratory of the Lugar Centre in Georgia [Москва потребовала допустить экспертов РФ во все биолаборатории центра Лугара в Грузии]’ Interfax, 26th Might. Accessible at: https://www.interfax.ru/world/710418 (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Klepper, D., Amiri, F.,& Dupuy, B. (2020) ‘The superspreaders behind high COVID-19 conspiracy theories’, Related Press, 15th February. Accessible at: https://apnews.com/article/conspiracy-theories-iran-only-on-ap-media-misinformation-bfca6d5b236a29d61c4dd38702495ffe (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Mediascope (2020) Scores (Рейтинги). Accessible at: https://mediascope.web/knowledge/ (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Ministry of Overseas Affairs of the Russian Federation (2020) Remark by the Info and Press Division on the Georgian Overseas Ministry’s response apropos of the Richard Lugar Centre for Public Well being Analysis. Accessible at: https://www.mid.ru/television/?id=1433757&lang=en (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Mythdetector (2021) Disinformation of the so-called “South Ossetian” KGB, as if the African Swine Fever Virus is Spreading from Georgia. Accessible at: https://mythdetector.ge/en/disinformation-of-the-so-called-south-ossetian-kgb-as-if-the-african-swine-fever-virus-is-spreading-from-georgia/ (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Popov, D. (2020) ‘Anti-Russian viruses within the laboratories of the American “BioPRO” (Антироссийские вирусы в лабораториях американской БиоПРО)’, RIA Novosti, 2nd March. Accessible at: https://ria.ru/20140723/1017236855.html (Accessed: 12.03.2024).
Rosenberg, S., Vernon, W.,& Gobbard, M. (2018) ‘Russian disinformation and the Georgian ‘lab of dying’’, BBC, 11th November. Accessible at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/information/av/world-46157507 (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Saqinform (2020) ‘Arno Khidirbegishvili: The coronavirus COVID-19 is a bacteriological weapon, only some know the entire fact. [Арно Хидирбегишвили: Коронавирус COVID 19 – бактериологическое оружие, всю правду о котором знают лишь немногие]’, Saqinform, 24th March. Accessible at: http://ru.saqinform.ge/information/44384/arno-KidirbegiSvili-koronavirus-COVID-19-bakteriologiCeskoe-oruZie-vsU-pravdu-o-kotorom-znaUt-liSi-nemnogie.html (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Saqinform (2020) ‘Sensation! The Georgian analyst revealed the key of the coronavirus – Khidirbegishvili ended up being proper! [СЕНСАЦИЯ: ГРУЗИНСКИЙ АНАЛИТИК РАСКРЫЛ ТАЙНУ КОРОНАВИРУСА – ХИДИРБЕГИШВИЛИ ОКАЗАЛСЯ ПРАВ!]’, Saqinform, 24th March. Accessible at: http://ru.saqinform.ge/information/44688/sensaciA-gruzinskij-analitik-raskril-tajnu-koronavirusa—KidirbegiSvili-okazalsA-prav-.html (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Saqinform (2020) ‘The American normal didn’t exclude Gruzinform’s (Saqinform’s) model [Американский генерал не исключил версию ГРУЗИНФОРМ]’, Saqinform, 16th April. Accessible at: http://ru.saqinform.ge/information/44657/amerikanskij-general-ne-isklUCil-versiU-gruzinform.html (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Sputnik Yuzhanaya Osetia (2020) ‘The American curators from the medical analysis corps of the US Military in Georgia give duties to the Georgian management of the Centre comparable to the event of a bioweapon that’s aimed toward precision strikes towards the South Ossetian inhabitants. [Американские кураторы из медицинского исследовательского подразделения армии США в Грузии ставят перед грузинским руководством центра такие задачи, как “разработка биологического оружия, направленного на точечное поражение югоосетинской популяции”]’ Sputnik Yuzhanaya Osetia, 5th October. https://net.archive.org/net/20201005125900/https:/sputnik-ossetia.ru/radio/20200929/11195825/V-Gruzii-sozdayut-bakteriologicheskoe-oruzhie—ekspert.html (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Sputnik Yuzhnaya Osetiya (2020) ‘The KGB of South Ossetia revealed the info on the duties of the Lugar biolaboratory in Georgia [КГБ Южной Осетии обнародовал данные о задачах биолаборатории Лугара в Грузии]’, Sputnik Yuzhnaya Osetiya, 28th November. Accessible at: https://net.archive.org/net/20201128200346/https:/sputnik-ossetia.ru/South_Ossetia/20200609/10702364/KGB-Yuzhnoy-Osetii-obnarodoval-dannye-o-zadachakh-biolaboratorii-Lugara-v-Gruzii.html (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
State Safety Committee of the Republic of South Ossetia [KGB RYuO] (2020) Declaration [Сообщение]. Accessible at: https://kgbruo.org/soobshhenie-43/ (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
State Safety Committee of the Republic of South Ossetia [KGB RYuO] (2020b) Declaration [Сообщение]. Accessible at: https://kgbruo.org/soobshhenie-52/ (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
TASS (2020) ‘Georgia will solely let Russian specialists into the Lugar Laboratory as half a wider delegation [Грузия допустит экспертов РФ в лабораторию Лугара только в составе более широкой делегации]’, TASS, 7th June. Accessible at:https://net.archive.org/net/20200607023737/https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/8592423 (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Vesti (2018) ‘The Laboratory of Dying beneath Tbilisi: documentation of experiments on folks and organic weapons is revealed[Лаборатория смерти под Тбилиси: опубликованы записи об опытах над людьми и биологическом оружии]’, Vesti, 14th September. Accessible at: https://www.vesti.ru/article/1498355 (Accessed: 21.03.2024).
Secondary sources
Bentzen, N. (2016) NATO strategic communications – An evolving battle of narratives. Brussels: European Parliamentary Analysis Service, pp.1-4. Accessible at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/586600/EPRS_BRI(2016)586600_EN.pdf (Accessed: 07.02.2024).
Bolkvadze N., Chachava, Ok., Ghvedashvili, G., Lange-Ionatamišvili, E., McMillan, J., Kalandarishvili, N., Keshelashvili, A., Kuprashvili, N., Sharashenidze, T.,& Tsomaia, T. (2021) Georgia’s Info Atmosphere by means of the Lens of Russia’s Affect. Riga: NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. pp. 4-121. Accessible at: https://stratcomcoe.org/publications/georgias-information-environment-through-the-lens-of-russias-influence/212 (Accessed: 28.02.2024).
Darczewska, J. (2014) ‘The Anatomy of Russian Info Warfare – The Crimean Operations – a Case Research’, Level of View, 42, pp. 5-33. Accessible at: https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/point-view/2014-05-22/anatomy-russian-information-warfare-crimean-operation-a-case-study (Accessed: 07.02.2024).
Darczewska, J. (2015) ‘The satan is within the particulars – Info Warfare within the Gentle of Russia’s Navy Doctrine’, Level of View,50, pp. 5-39. Accessible at: https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/point-view/2015-05-19/devil-details-information-warfare-light-russias-military-doctrine (Accessed: 07.02.2024).
Diresta, R.,& Grossman, S. (2019) Potemkin Pages and Personas: Assessing GRU On-line Operations, 2014-2019. Stanford: Stanford Web Observatory. pp. 3-99. Accessible at: https://fsi.stanford.edu/publication/potemkin-think-tanks (Accessed: 28.02.2024).
Eady, G., Paskhalis, T.,& Zilinsky, J. et al. (2023) ‘Publicity to the Russian Web Analysis Company overseas affect marketing campaign on Twitter within the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behaviour’, Nature Communications, 14 (62), pp.1-11. Accessible at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35576-9 (Accessed: 27.02.2024).
Gerasimov, V. (2013) ‘Tsennost’ nauki v predvidennii’, Novosti VPK, 27th February. Accessible at: https://vpk.identify/information/85159_cennost_nauki_v_predvidenii.html (Accessed: 07.02.2024).
Giles, Ok. (2016) Handbook of Russian Info Warfare. pp.3-77. Rome: NATO Defence Faculty. Accessible at: https://css.ethz.ch/content material/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/assets/docs/NDCpercent20fm_9.pdf (Accessed: 15.02.2024).
Giles, Ok. (2016) The Subsequent Part of Russian Info Warfare. pp.2-16. Riga: NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. Accessible at: https://stratcomcoe.org/publications/the-next-phase-of-russian-information-warfare/176 (Accessed: 07.02.2024).
Hanley M.,& Kuzichkin A. (2021) Russian Media Panorama: Buildings, Mechanisms, and Applied sciences of Info Operations. Riga: NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. Accessible at: https://stratcomcoe.org/publications/russian-media-landscape-structures-mechanisms-and-technologies-of-information-operations/215 (Accessed: 02.03.2024).
Insikt Group (2022) ‘Putin’s Potential Successors Half 1: Sergei Kirienko’, Recorded Future, 4th November. Accessible at: https://go.recordedfuture.com/hubfs/reviews/ta-2022-1104.pdf (Accessed: 02.03.2024).
Juurvee, I., Sazonov, V., Parppei, Ok., Engīzers, E., Palasz, I.,& Zawadska, M. (2021) Falsification of Historical past as a Instrument of Affect. pp.6-76. Riga: NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. Accessible at: https://stratcomcoe.org/publications/falsification-of-history-as-a-tool-of-influence/16 (Accessed: 27.02.2024).
Kiriya, I. (2021) ‘From “Troll Factories” to “Littering the Info House”: Management Methods Over the Russian Web’, Media and Communication, 9(4), pp. 16-26. Accessible at: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4177 (Accessed: 27.02.2024).
Kovaleva, N. (2018) ‘Russian Info House, Russian Scholarship, and Kremlin Controls’, Defence Strategic Communications, 4, pp.133-172. Accessible at: 10.30966/2018.RIGA.4.5. (Accessed: 03.03.2024).
Lange-Ionatamisvili, E. (2015) Evaluation of Russia’s info Marketing campaign In opposition to Ukraine – Inspecting non-military points of the Ukraine Disaster from a strategic communications perspective. pp.3-39. Riga: NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. Accessible at: https://stratcomcoe.org/cuploads/pfiles/russian_information_campaign_public_12012016fin.pdf (Accessed: 07.02.2024).
Maurer, T.,& Janz, S. (2014) The Russia-Ukraine Battle: Cyber and Info Warfare in a Regional Context. pp.1-4.Zurich: ETH Zurich.Accessible at: https://www.recordsdata.ethz.ch/isn/187945/ISN_184345_en.pdf (Accessed: 07.02.2024).
McIntosh, S. E.(2015) ‘Kyiv, Worldwide Establishments, and the Russian Individuals: Three Features of Russia’s Present Info Marketing campaign in Ukraine’, The Journal of Slavic Navy Research, 28(2), pp. 299-306. Accessible at: 10.1080/13518046.2015.1030263 (Accessed: 15.02.2024).
Osadchuk, R. (2022) Professional-Kremlin influencers reignite Zelenskyy “inexperienced display” principle. Accessible at: https://medium.com/dfrlab/pro-kremlin-influencers-reignite-zelenskyy-green-screen-theory-d827f761d17d (Accessed: 01.03.2024).
Paul, C.,& Matthews, M. (2016) The Russian “Firehose of Falsehood” Propaganda Mannequin: Why It May Work and Choices to Counter It. pp.1-16. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Company, Accessible at: https://www.rand.org/pubs/views/PE198.html. (Accessed: 28.02.2024).
Pertsev, A. (2022) Sergei Kirienko’s new sphere of affect.Accessible at: https://net.archive.org/net/20220702225709/https://ridl.io/sergei-kirienko-s-new-sphere-of-influence/ (Accessed: 02.03.2024).
Pomerantsev, P. (2015) ‘Authoritarianism Goes International (II): The Kremlin’s Info Warfare’, Journal of Democracy, 26(4), pp. 40-50. Accessible at: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0074 (Accessed: 07.02.2024).
Pomerantsev, P. (2015) Nothing is True and Every little thing is Potential – The Surreal Coronary heart of the New Russia. pp. 60-69. New York: Public Affairs.
Putin, V. (2007) Speech and the Following Dialogue on the Munich Convention on Safety Coverage (English translation). Accessible at: http://en.kremlin.ru/occasions/president/transcripts/24034 (Accessed: 02.03.2024).
Pynnöniemi, Ok.,& Rácz, A. (2016) ‘Fog of ’Falsehood – Russian Technique of Deception and the Battle in Ukraine’, FIIA Report, 45. Accessible at: https://www.fiia.fi/en/publication/fog-of-falsehood (Accessed: 15.02.2024).
Rogov, Ok.,& Ananyev, M. (2018) ‘Public Opinion and Russian Politics.’ In Treisman, D. (Ed.) The New Autocracy: Info, Politics, and Coverage in Putin’s Russia. pp. 191–216. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Establishment Press. Accessible at: http://www.jstor.org/secure/10.7864/j.ctt1zkjzsh.11 (Accessed: 02.03.2024).
Sazonov, V., Müür, Ok.,& Mölder, H. at al. (2015) Russian Info Marketing campaign In opposition to the Ukrainian State and Defence Forces. pp.4-116. Riga: NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. Accessible at: https://www.ksk.edu.ee/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Report_infoops_08.02.2017.pdf (Accessed: 15.02.2024).
Sazonov, V., Saumets, A.,& Mölder, H. (2016) ‘THE CRISIS IN UKRAINE AND INFORMATION OPERATIONS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION’, Estonian Journal of Navy Research, 2, pp.7-240. Accessible at: https://www.researchgate.web/publication/364165705_THE_CRISIS_IN_UKRAINE_AND_INFORMATION
_OPERATIONS_OF_THE_RUSSIAN_FEDERATION_Estonian_Journal_of_Military_Studies_2 (Accessed: 15.02.2024).
Snegovaya, M. (2015) ‘Putin’s Info Warfare in Ukraine – Soviet Origins of Russia’s Hybrid Warfare.’ Russia Report, 1, pp.7-28. Accessible at: https://www.understandingwar.org/report/putins-information-warfare-ukraine-soviet-origins-russias-hybrid-warfare (Accessed: 07.02.2024).
Stolze, M. (2022) Info Laundering By way of Baltnews on Telegram: How Russian State-Sponsored Media Evade Sanctions and Narrate the Warfare. pp.4-36. Riga: NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. Accessible at: https://stratcomcoe.org/publications/information-laundering-via-baltnews-on-telegram-how-russian-state-sponsored-media-evade-sanctions-and-narrate-the-war/257 (Accessed: 28.02.2024).
Thomas, T. L. (1998) ‘Dialectical versus empirical pondering: Ten key parts of the Russian understanding of data operations’, The Journal of Slavic Navy Research, 11(1), pp.40-62. DOI: 10.1080/13518049808430328 (Accessed: 20.03.2024).
Thomas, T. L. (2010) ‘RUSSIAN INFORMATION WARFARE THEORY: THE CONSEQUENCES OF AUGUST 2008.’ in Clean, S. J., Weitz, R. (Eds.) THE RUSSIAN MILITARY TODAY AND TOMORROW: ESSAYS IN MEMORY OF MARY FITZGERALD. pp. 265–300. Carlisle Barracks,
PA.: Strategic Research Institute, US Military Warfare Faculty. Accessible at: http://www.jstor.org/secure/resrep12110.8 (Accessed: 07.02.2024).
Watling, J., Danylyuk, O. V.,& Reynolds, N. (2024) Particular Report: The Risk from Russia’s Unconventional Warfare Past Ukraine, 2022-24. pp.1-34. London: Royal United Companies Institute. Accessible at: https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/special-resources/threat-russias-unconventional-warfare-beyond-ukraine-2022-24 (Accessed: 02.03.2024).
Wilk, A,& Żochowski, P. (2022) Huge rocket assaults on Ukraine. 228th day of the conflict. Accessible at: https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2022-10-10/massive-rocket-attacks-ukraine-228th-day-war (Accessed: 02.03.2024).
Zakem, V., Saunders, P.,& Antoun, D. (2015) Mobilizing Compatriots: Russia’s Technique, Techniques and Affect within the Former Soviet Union. pp.3-53. Accessible at: https://www.cna.org/archive/CNA_Files/pdf/dop-2015-u-011689-1rev.pdf (Accessed: 01.03.2024).
Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations
