For over two years, the unprovoked Russian invasion of Ukraine has saved the world in suspense. With this invasion, strategic Russian disinformation through social media in addition to worldwide information media has elevated considerably. The Russian disinformation marketing campaign reached an depth that led to the European Union imposing heavy sanctions on Russian information networks similar to Russia As we speak (RT). The EU Excessive Consultant of International Affairs and Safety Coverage, Josep Borrell, described Russian disinformation through networks similar to RT as “a big and direct risk to the Union’s public order and safety” (Borrell as cited in Council of the EU, 2022). Subsequent to Russian disinformation, the rising nuclear rhetoric of Russia has frightened NATO and has, since Russian President Putin’s Annexation Speech during which he vowed to retain Russian territorial integrity together with the annexed Ukrainian territories in any respect prices, occupied the forefronts of Western newspapers.
This analysis seeks to make clear the present scenario by answering the next analysis query: What’s Russia’s strategic narrative concerning the nuclear tensions with NATO over the Ukraine battle as introduced in Russia As we speak? To reply this analysis query, this paper will give a brief overview of the essential developments within the conflict on Ukraine which led to the nuclear tensions between Russia and NATO. Subsequently, this paper introduces the theoretical framework of strategic narrative evaluation, a brand new strategy to analyzing a state’s public diplomacy. A literature overview with a following elaboration on this analysis’s relevance offers perception into earlier analysis on Russian strategic narrative analyses and elaborates on how this paper improves the present physique of analysis. In an intensive part on this analysis’s findings, the recognized themes and strategic narratives are described and subsequently mentioned. Lastly, limitations and future analysis wants are addressed earlier than concludingly discovering that Russia’s strategic narrative concerning the nuclear tensions with NATO as introduced in RT is threefold: Russia sees the worldwide system as a renewed Chilly Conflict system during which two superpowers have interaction in a nuclear face-off; it conceptualizes itself as a accountable actor eager to keep away from nuclear conflict whereas NATO is seen as internally divided and pushing nuclear brinkmanship; and it sees itself as going through nuclear threats from each Ukraine and NATO.
Nuclear Brinkmanship within the Conflict on Ukraine
In December 2021, U.S. intelligence began warning a few Russian army build-up of 100 thousand troops close to the border and, shortly after, the Russian overseas ministry issued calls for. NATO was to not broaden additional towards Russia, army motion within the Jap components of NATO was to stop, and an assurance was to be issued that Ukraine wouldn’t be allowed to affix NATO sooner or later. These calls for have been rejected by NATO and full-scale invasion began on 24th February 2022. So, whereas the conflict engages largely Russia and Ukraine, NATO has been a celebration to the battle because the very starting (Heart for Preventive Motion, 2022).
Russia and NATO, nevertheless, understand the alliance’s function within the battle in a different way. Whereas Russia follows a story that usually conceptualizes NATO as a direct opponent and fight celebration, NATO rejects all notions of being concerned in energetic conflict in opposition to Russia. As an alternative, it stresses its defensive capabilities regarding its member states and a supportive operate regarding Ukraine and its proper to self-defense (NATO, 2022).
Amongst others, the narrative round NATO being at conflict with Russia has been recognized as part of Russia’s strategic misinformation campaigns focused at Western audiences. These campaigns escalated with the start of the invasion of Ukraine. Different myths propagated by the Russian authorities on this means embody the notion that Ukraine is an inherent a part of Russia as a substitute of an autonomous state, or that it was ruled by nationwide socialists (Bazio Terracino and Martasick, 2022).
The U.S. Division of State’s International Engagement Heart (2022) has issued an in depth report about Russia’s misinformation marketing campaign and recognized state-linked media as being one of many 5 pillars upon which the marketing campaign rests. Inside this report, RT and Sputnik have been talked about as probably the most outstanding examples of state-linked media. Particularly RT has typically been described as a mouthpiece for the Kremlin (Yablokov, 2015). It was based in 2005 via a Kremlin-funded program to advertise the Russian state and its views overseas. Since then, it has established regional places of work like RT DE (Germany), RT America (United States), and RT Arabic (Center East). Whereas its preliminary purpose was the promotion of Russian tradition, the channel turned in direction of political reporting in 2008 through the battle in Georgia. Since then, it has established itself as an alternative choice to so-called Western mainstream media (Yablokov, 2015).
Though RT isn’t an official state medium as Sputnik is, the direct ties with the Kremlin are evident: by 2015 (final dependable numbers), the Kremlin elevated its investments in RT by 40% (Rawnsley, 2015), hiring processes are authorities managed, tales will be disapproved and censored by the federal government, direct telephone traces exist between the editorial board and the Kremlin, and writers obtain coaching which ensures coherence with authorities traces in RT articles (U.S. DoS GEC, 2022). RT’s outstanding function in spreading Russian authorities positions to Western audiences is thus undebated, together with the continued conflict.
In September 2022, Vladimir Putin gave a speech through the annexation ceremony of the Ukrainian areas Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia. The ceremony adopted referendums, which have been closely criticized within the West and experiences of coerced voting quickly adopted (Polityuk, 2022). The speech, which sealed the annexation, included a phrase concerning the newly acquired territories that rapidly sparked unrest within the West: “We’ll defend our land with all of the powers and means at our disposal” (Putin, as cited in Polityuk, 2022). Whereas Putin made no direct reference to the nation’s nuclear arsenals, the wording was understood to incorporate a stage of nuclear compellence by NATO (de Dreuzy and Gilli, 2022), and a solution by President Biden equated the scenario to the Cuban Missile Disaster and acknowledged that the usage of even tactical nuclear weapons would finish in “Armageddon” (Fossum et al., 2022). Whereas Putin brazenly declared that there was no true intention of utilizing nuclear weapons within the battle, actions such because the Russian postponement of the New START weapons inspection talks with U.S. officers (Dixon, 2022) or bulletins declaring the growth of nuclear arms infrastructures in Russia by 2023 (Reuters, 2022) saved the subject of nuclear escalation on the forefront of media protection of the conflict in an try to know the re-emerging nuclear brinkmanship.
Strategic Narratives
“Name it public diplomacy, or public affairs, or psychological warfare, or—if you happen to actually wish to be blunt— propaganda.”, Richard Holbrooke, a Washington Put up journalist, writes in 2001 in an article protecting the conflict on terror (Holbrooke, 2001). With this sentence, he summarizes a phenomenon that has change into more and more essential within the research of Worldwide Relations with the emergence of enormous, transnational media, similar to CNN Worldwide, Al Jazeera, or BBC World, and the web. These are mediums which have change into central sources of data for folks across the globe. They supply a stage for state- and non-state actors, people, and NGOs to share their viewpoints and unfold a positive picture or repute about themselves and their actions overseas in addition to of their dwelling nation (Gilboa, 2008).
Analyses of the shaping of overseas public notion, or public diplomacy making, have been particularly essential through the Chilly Conflict however got new significance with the emergence of the web and worldwide media, which permits governments extra direct entry to populations overseas (Gilboa, 2008). Gilboa (2008) criticizes the vagueness of the ideas which concern the shaping of public opinion in populations overseas, which may vary from propaganda to public diplomacy, phrases that usually carry a normative connotation with them.
Miskimmon et al. (2014) of their seminal work current a impartial means of analyzing what they time period strategic narratives. The time period describes the narrative approaches utilized by political actors, that are focused at overseas audiences and search to affect their opinion in favor of the narrating political actor. These political actors are normally states. Strategic narratives are particularly essential in issues of conflict, strategic communication, and safety and, as aforementioned, change into particularly essential in a extremely accessible and internationalized web and media panorama (Miskimmon et al., 2014). The authors describe three interrelated ranges of strategic narratives: system narratives, identification narratives, and problem narratives. System narratives are supposed to form the recipient audiences’ understanding of the worldwide system, its nature, and its buildings, within the favor of the political actor pursuing the narrative. Id narratives search to affect how the political actor is perceived overseas, particularly its attributed traits (e.g., authoritarian, free or liberal). Lastly, problem narratives are associated to a selected occasion and intend to focus the discourse on it in favor of the political actor (Miskimmon et al., 2014).
The idea of strategic narrative evaluation can present an environment friendly software to conceptualizing how Russia presents the opportunity of nuclear escalation within the Ukraine battle through widespread worldwide networks similar to Russia As we speak. Subsequently, this paper goals to hint Russia’s strategic narrative in RT concerning nuclear confrontation with NATO via the next analysis query: What’s Russia’s strategic narrative concerning the nuclear tensions with NATO over the Ukraine battle as introduced in Russia As we speak?
Literature Evaluate
To construct on the present literature and successfully add to it, this analysis seeks to first give an outline of the present literature within the discipline of strategic narrative analyses regarding Russia. Ryzhova (2019) analyzes the strategic narratives, which Russia spreads about Sweden through RT. Her evaluation finds that Sweden is principally characterised by its angle in direction of migration, identification/values, and safety. Bushue (2015) equally engages in a strategic narrative evaluation concerning the function of the Arctic for Russian safety and finds themes that painting Russian army engagement within the Arctic as essential because of the must match NATO and the US, to defend the nation, or to reclaim beforehand inhabited areas. Khaldarova (2016) analyzes how Russian strategic narratives differ between dwelling and worldwide audiences and finds that these are slightly related. For this, she additionally attracts knowledge from RT, which prominently spreads narratives that set the West and Russia in distinction and competitors with one another. Hinck et al. (2018) in an evaluation of Russian worldwide media, prominently amongst them RT, discover that certainly one of Russia’s essential strategic narratives is the destructive portrayal of NATO. NATO is characterised as an aggressive, destabilizing, unified actor dominated by the US. Russia, in distinction, is at all times characterised positively. Szotek (2017a) additionally considers Russia’s self-portrayal in its strategic narratives in RT and finds that Russia defines itself positively and benign in distinction to a negatively connotated West/the US in addition to presenting a fantastic energy inside Europe and the world. A number of different papers focus on Russian strategic narrative formation with out instantly mentioning or using Russia As we speak. Khaldarova and Pantti (2020) analyze Russian disinformation in regards to the Crimean annexation disaster inside Ukraine. They discover that Russia employs strategic narratives which hyperlink the Ukrainian authorities to Nazi Germany and body Ukraine as a safety hazard. Claessen (2021) considers the function of Russian strategic narratives within the relationship between the EU and Russia and finds that Russia engages in geopolitical othering of the EU (the apply of othering during which geography, identification, and politics are equated) and warns that this may complicate the 2 actors’ relationship sooner or later. Ventsel et al. (2021) assess the usage of strategic narratives regarding Russia’s army technique and its relationship to NATO and discover that Russia positively defines itself in opposition to a negatively outlined NATO.
Whereas all the beforehand talked about articles focus on the formation and projection of Russia’s strategic narratives and search to level these out, few articles deal with the reception of those narratives inside the audience. Wagnsson and Lundström (2022) assess the reception of strategic narratives in Sweden and discover that it’s comparatively simple for strategic narratives to be obtained by the Swedish inhabitants. In an evaluation of Russian strategic narrative reception amongst Ukrainians, Szotek (2017b) finds that Ukrainians are particularly receptive to Russian strategic narratives when particular person linkages, i.e., household ties, journey experiences, friendships, or different pro-Russian inclinations exist already. Though the analysis on Russian strategic narratives remains to be sparse, the present literature reveals one essential strategic narrative during which Russia appears to interact, particularly via RT: a optimistic framing of Russia in opposition to a destructive framing of the West, NATO, or the US.
Lastly, to ascertain a holistic overview of the analysis matter, this literature overview should handle the difficulty of public diplomacy which is intently related to the framework of strategic narratives for a holistic overview of the analysis matter. Public diplomacy is seen as a means of strengthening the delicate energy of a state by partaking with overseas audiences, largely via the media (Yablokov, 2015). Strategic narratives in addition to propaganda are a part of public diplomacy, and thus, literature on the utility and technique behind Russia’s strategy to public diplomacy may be helpful in understanding strategic narratives additional. Public diplomacy has additionally been used as a framework earlier than the popularization of strategic narrative evaluation because the articles surrounding the difficulty are from earlier than 2020, which is why reviewing articles that have interaction with public diplomacy is important to incorporate on this overview.
Yablokov (2015) assesses the usage of RT as a public diplomacy software and finds that the community is generally engaged with delegitimizing Western or American energy and, as a substitute, legitimizing a Russian rise to energy. Yablokov additionally finds that RT is a mouthpiece of the Kremlin, which strictly follows Kremlin tips on political points. Paul and Matthews (2016) delineate what they name the Russian Firehose of Falsehood Mannequin. On this mannequin, Russia As we speak is described as partaking in high-volume, repetitive disinformation to persuade overseas populations of Kremlin opinions on political points. In a 2015 research, Rawnsley finds that the Russian public diplomacy scheme in Russia As we speak is generally preoccupied with countering the outstanding Western voice within the media. Russian public diplomacy largely prioritizes being an antithesis of the West.
Finally, analysis on strategic narratives typically, but in addition on Russian strategic narratives is comparatively sparse. Nonetheless, a literature overview of the related sources has established {that a} outstanding, research-spanning narrative adopted by Russia via RT is a optimistic self-definition in opposition to a destructive definition of NATO, the US, or the West typically.
Methodology
The idea for this analysis’s knowledge assortment was shaped by articles printed on RT.com, the worldwide Russia As we speak web site. Causes for choosing RT over different media to pursue strategic narrative evaluation will be summarized by RT’s particular process to advertise Russia overseas, its direct connection to the Kremlin, in addition to its affect on Western populations (Council of the EU, 2022; U.S. DoS GEC, 2022; RT, 2022). The time-frame for the articles chosen was September thirtieth, 2022, which is the date of Putin’s annexation speech that sparked heightened unrest with regard to the usage of nuclear weapons within the West (Polityuk, 2022). This date marks the start of a brand new consciousness across the potential use of nuclear weapons and was, thus, taken as an applicable date to start out knowledge assortment. As an finish date, thirty first December 2022 was chosen. Finally, 58 articles have been chosen for a thematic evaluation following the six-step course of outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006). Thematic evaluation has, because of its inductive nature, additionally been employed within the strategic narrative analyses of Ryzhova (2019), van Noort (2017), and Szotek (2017b). After producing a number of essential themes from the chosen articles, they have been in comparison with the three sorts of strategic narratives: system narratives, identification narratives, and system narratives. The themes have been then attributed to these classes, which led to the identification of strategic narratives primarily based on the recognized themes.
Findings
The thematic evaluation of the 58 RT articles exhibits 4 essential themes: Russia’s function and place, the West/NATO as an agitator, inside fragmentation and weak spot of the West/NATO, and Ukraine as a nuclear risk to Russia. This part will proceed by giving an intensive clarification of every theme and elaborating on its relevance on this analysis. The themes have been then organized into the three strategic narrative classes, which Miskimmon et al. (2014) suggest: System Narratives, which symbolize Russia’s view on the worldwide system; Id Narratives, which symbolize Russia’s characterization of itself and different actors; and Concern Narratives, which symbolize Russia’s place on the nuclear tensions over the Ukraine conflict. For this, the totally different themes have been related to whether or not or not they portrayed views on the worldwide system, on the identification of both actor or the difficulty of the conflict in Ukraine. The synthesis of those themes yielded three distinct Strategic Narratives, particularly one system, identification, and problem narrative.
Most important Themes
Russia’s Position and Place
This part seeks to put out Russia’s self-understanding concerning the nuclear tensions of the battle in addition to their place and targets as introduced by RT. Russia’s essential goal is to characterize itself as a accountable actor who desires to forestall nuclear escalation of the battle. This self-portrayal is established by denying Western allegations of Russian nuclear threats, referring to the readability of the Russian nuclear technique, condemning the concept of nuclear conflict, and making efforts within the UN to safe the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.
First, Russia denies perceived Western allegations continuously and sometimes in related wording. Out of the 58 articles analyzed, 24 included direct refutations of getting issued a nuclear risk to both Ukraine or the West. Typically, these refutations seem in related wording similar to “[n]umerous Russian officers have since insisted that the nation was not threatening anyone with atomic weapons” or “[h]owever, a number of Russian senior officers insisted that Moscow isn’t threatening anybody with its nuclear arsenal”.
Furthermore, every time these denials are talked about, they normally comply with explanations of how a “remark [Putin’s Annexation Speech] set off a wave of nuclear panic within the West”. The West has merely interpreted the speech and Russian nuclear rhetoric wrongly (“His phrases have been interpreted by the US and its allies as a “veiled risk” by the Kremlin to make use of atomic weapons throughout Russia’s army operation in Ukraine”). Whether or not or not this can be a purposeful misinterpretation or a misunderstanding is usually left open and never additional commented on by RT. Normally, RT makes use of language, which signifies an overreaction to the annexation speech and additional remarks by Russian officers similar to “nuclear panic”, and classifying the Western response as an “interpretation” as a substitute of a reputable response to a nuclear risk. Additionally, Western threats of “extreme” and even “catastrophic penalties” are contrasted with the beforehand launched refutations of nuclear threats. Every time an RT article introduces the potential Western solutions to a nuclear strike by Russia, RT substitutes this with a reminder that Russia has by no means issued a nuclear risk, thus contributing to the picture of a accountable Russian Federation that tries to stability the overreactions of the West as regards to nuclear questions.
Secondly, when the problems of potential nuclear confrontation come up, RT articles typically check with the Russian Nuclear Technique (RNS) that’s talked about in 26 of the 58 articles, largely in connection to contextualizing the potential use of nuclear weapons by Russia for the reader. Fascinating right here is the point out of Russian territorial integrity and the RNS. Formally, the RNS states the next:
The Russian Federation retains the appropriate to make use of nuclear weapons in response to the usage of nuclear weapons and different forms of weapons of mass destruction in opposition to it and/or its allies and likewise within the case of aggression in opposition to the Russian Federation with the usage of typical weapons when the very existence of the state is put underneath risk.
Primary Rules of State Coverage of the Russian Federation on Nuclear Deterrence (2020)
Whereas the RNS doesn’t point out a risk to Russian territorial integrity as a purpose for the usage of nuclear weapons, this was indicated in Putin’s Annexation Speech in addition to a number of RT articles (“[the separation of the annexed territories from Russia] would qualify as a risk to the territorial integrity of Russia and due to this fact ‘a direct purpose for making use of Clause 19’ of the Russian state doctrine on nuclear deterrence”). The RNS is constantly referred to when denying that the annexation speech, which indicated that Russia would use “all means essential to defend the nation if its territory was threatened”, constituted a veiled nuclear risk. Reference to the RNS in response to allegations of nuclear threats is made in 14 articles.
Thirdly, RT portrays Russia as stopping nuclear escalation by condemning nuclear conflict and Westerners who entice it. RT articles cite Russian officers who’re dedicated to stopping a nuclear escalation of the battle 14 occasions. These assurances of nuclear non-escalation take an identical wording as the next quote: “Russia stands by its signature on the January 3 joint assertion with leaders of the ‘Nuclear 5’ […] on the prevention of nuclear conflict and the unacceptability of a nuclear arms race.” Moreover, RT cites Russian officers who name out Western leaders’ alleged rhetoric pushing nuclear brinkmanship. Subsequent to the direct condemnations of nuclear conflict, Russia additionally sees itself as stopping nuclear conflict by warning the United Nations and different states about Ukraine’s alleged dirty-bomb endeavor. That is the place this theme interlinks with the part Ukraine as a Nuclear Menace to Russia, the place a more in-depth description of this side will be discovered.
The West/NATO as Agitator
Russia sees NATO as being managed by the US or as a European extension of the US’s army energy. Equally, RT makes use of the expression “the West” as a synonym for NATO. For instance, Putin remarked that Russia was combating in opposition to “the whole Western army machine”, whereas different articles painting NATO as an actively collaborating conflict celebration: “Russia has repeatedly warned the US and its allies that their overt support to the federal government in Ukraine makes them events to the battle in Ukraine”. Subsequently, this analysis addresses NATO and The West collectively to replicate the Russian sentiment.
The West/NATO is seen because the true agitator behind the nuclear tensions over the Ukraine battle. RT claims that NATO engages in nuclear brinkmanship via aggressive rhetoric and army workouts, and claims that NATO and particular person NATO international locations search to broaden NATO’s nuclear capacities and are keen to interrupt treaties to take action. The West/NATO is the one significantly entertaining the opportunity of a nuclear confrontation, RT seeks to convey to its reader, and repeatedly have interaction in nuclear brinkmanship: “The [foreign] ministry additionally referred to as [on the Nuclear Five to] abandon harmful makes an attempt to infringe on one another’s important pursuits, balancing on the point of direct armed battle and inspiring provocations with WMD” or “Putin was requested whether or not the world was certainly on the point of nuclear conflict, given more and more worrisome rhetoric in Western media”. The theme of the West/NATO partaking in nuclear brinkmanship is present in 23 of the 58 articles. Most articles quote NATO officers or NATO secretary common Jens Stoltenberg, US officers, and President Biden, but in addition Polish and British officers. Typically, when a place is launched, which portrays the West/NATO as partaking in nuclear brinkmanship (“Western governments are drawing up plans to keep away from panic amongst their residents ought to a nuclear weapon be utilized in Ukraine”), the article will subsequently introduce a bit that explains how Russia has by no means issued any nuclear threats to warrant this (“Russian Protection Minister Sergey Shoigu in August made it clear that Moscow isn’t contemplating a nuclear strike on Ukraine.”). This amplifies the reader’s feeling that the West/NATO is much more irresponsible and unjustified in pushing nuclear rhetoric and portrays Russia as a contrasting, accountable actor.
Moreover, Russia alleges NATO and NATO member states of breaking or ignoring treaties concerning nuclear insurance policies, which distort the stability of energy inside Europe and endanger Russia’s Western border. Russia claims that NATO breaks the NPT via the US stationing nuclear weapons in Western Europe and coaching non-US personnel on how you can make the most of them. Subsequent to that, RT presents Finland and Sweden, each of whom haven’t dominated out stationing nuclear weapons on their territory after accession to NATO, in addition to Poland, which is considering becoming a member of the US’s nuclear sharing program, as contradicting the 1997 Russia-NATO Founding Act. On this political settlement, NATO acknowledged it had “no intention” of stationing nuclear weapons in international locations accessing the alliance after 1997 in addition to that it had no intentions of creating extreme modifications to its nuclear technique, however these statements in fact don’t exclude diversifications to new developments. RT declares that Finland and Sweden consider that “the 1997 NATO-Russia treaty shouldn’t be handled as an impediment to reaching this [stationing nuclear weapons on their territory]” whereas “Warsaw considers [the treaty] void”. It is very important notice right here that the NATO-Russia Founding Act isn’t formally thought of a treaty and might thus not be damaged (Dyner et al., 2018). RT’s use of the phrase treaty is thus extremely deceptive and insinuates that NATO member states break treaties they’ve by no means made. RT additionally focuses on an alleged breaking of the Act intimately regardless of Finland and Sweden not having had joined NATO at the moment and being removed from changing into hosts for US nuclear missiles. On the time, the US had instantly rejected Poland’s invitation for talks on the nuclear sharing program. That is acknowledged by RT, nevertheless, the main target stays on the truth that “Poland completely desires to host each a everlasting NATO troop presence and US nuclear weapons on its territory”, and the truth that “over half the inhabitants of Poland consider the US ought to station nuclear weapons within the nation”, trying to painting Poland as an actor who actively seeks to interrupt worldwide legislation and acquire and threaten Russia with nuclear weapons.
Inside Fragmentation and Weak spot of the West/NATO
Regardless of the earlier theme, which has alluded to how the West/NATO is perceived as a risk, one other theme that’s discovered all through the RT articles is the supposed inside fragmentation of NATO. Whereas NATO is commonly referred to as a “Western bloc”, hinting at Chilly Conflict tensions and assuming a unified actor, RT articles focus closely on inside contradictions and points which divide the alliance’s member states. One prime instance of this are the contradictory statements of the US and Poland concerning nuclear sharing talks. RT articles, as defined within the earlier part, regard Poland as a extra aggressive power inside NATO, which “has steered that Washington expanded its nuclear-sharing program and deployed warheads on its territory to function a deterrent in opposition to Moscow”. Nonetheless, the articles that concern Poland asking for nuclear weapons at all times embody the very direct reply of the US: “The US, nevertheless, has insisted that it has no plans to maneuver nuclear weapons to any Jap European NATO member or any nation that joined the bloc after 1997”.
One other instance consists of Turkey blocking the accession of Finland and Sweden into NATO, and contradictory statements by the UK and France when French President Macron publicly acknowledged that, even when Russia have been to make use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine, this is able to not warrant a purpose for France to assault Russia with nuclear weapons in flip. Articles handle harsh UK criticism over Macron exposing an excessive amount of of France’s nuclear plans to Russia, quoting UK Protection Secretary Ben Wallace “scolding French President Emmanuel Macron for revealing an excessive amount of when he stated Paris wouldn’t reply with its personal arsenal of nukes”. Additional articles handle a battle between Belgium and the UK concerning the supply of components wanted to keep up the UK nuclear arsenal. Based on RT, “two senior sources within the Belgian authorities […] voiced issues that the dispute might “endanger western unity and NATO” amid the Ukraine battle”.
Russia portrays NATO as divided over nuclear insurance policies and stances in direction of Russia. This means a sure weak spot and incapacity to focus and unite right into a risk to Russia. That is in stark distinction to the findings of the earlier part, which clarify how NATO is a threatening agitator within the battle which is taken significantly by Russia.
Ukraine as a Nuclear Menace to Russia
The final main theme all through the RT articles signifies that Ukraine is seen as a nuclear risk to Russia. Russia accuses Ukraine of fabricating a grimy bomb and makes use of this to tell apart itself as a accountable actor, which seeks to cease the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Based on RT, President Zelenskyy ordered the manufacturing of the unlawful nuclear bomb to “intimidate the native inhabitants, set off a refugee exodus to the EU, and painting Moscow as “a nuclear terrorist””. The alleged soiled bomb is thus supposed for use instantly in opposition to Russia in an act of nuclear terrorism. The identical line of argumentation holds for the supposed bombardment of the Zaporizhzhia powerplant. RT articles once more characterize the alleged assaults on the facility plant as nuclear terrorism, which is meant to escalate the battle and make Russia appear to be the instigator because the powerplant was managed by Russia on the time.
Three extra articles focus on Ukraine allegedly eager to resume a nuclear program, stating that “[t]he Ukrainian chief [Zelenskyy] lamented that Kiev [Kyiv] had given up nuclear weapons stationed there through the Soviet period and stated that his nation might break its promise to remain a non-nuclear state”. Subsequent to this extra overt nuclear risk which RT perceives, a number of articles focus on how Zelenskyy presumably requested NATO to hold out a nuclear first strike on Russia to finish the conflict: “Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky referred to as on Thursday for NATO to launch “preemptive strikes” in opposition to Russia throughout a dialogue on nuclear weapons”. The alleged nuclear threats, which Russia perceives from Ukraine, are thus covert (nuclear terrorism or blackmail within the circumstances of the powerplant and soiled bomb) and overt (threats to return to a nuclear weapons program and instigating NATO in opposition to Russia). Extra instantly, one article even names nuclear threats from Kyiv as a purpose for the conflict (“Kiev’s nuclear ambitions spurred Moscow’s army operation”) In complete, 14 articles focus on Ukraine as a nuclear risk and 10 extra – as a risk typically, not specifying its nature however utilizing language similar to “regime” or “psychos in Kiev”.
Strategic Narratives Recognized in RT
The themes, which have been extracted via thematic evaluation, can now be sorted into the three classes of strategic narratives relying on which class they correspond to: system narratives, identification narratives, and problem narratives. System narratives are supposed to form the recipient audiences’ understanding of the worldwide system, its nature and its buildings, within the favor of the political actor pursuing the narrative. Id narratives search to affect how the political actor is perceived overseas. Lastly, problem narratives are associated to a selected occasion and intend to focus the discourse on it in favor of the political actor (Miskimmon et al., 2014). The system narrative is knowledgeable by the themes Russia’s Position and Place, The West/NATO as Agitator and Inside Fragmentation and Weak spot of the West/NATO. The identification narrative Russia seeks to convey is principally knowledgeable by the identical set of themes, and the difficulty narrative is knowledgeable by The West/NATO as Agitator and Ukraine as a Nuclear Menace to Russia.
System Narrative: A Re-Born Chilly Conflict System With a Nuclear Face-off Between Superpowers
Russia perceives the nuclear stalemate with NATO as a Chilly-Conflict-like battle. Carefully related to the identification narrative, Russia appears to understand itself as a superpower because of its maintain on nuclear weapons and the impact these weapons would have on its adversaries, slightly than conventional superpower options similar to being a world-leading economies. Resulting from its capability to exert affect over the NATO states via veiled nuclear threats, Russia conceptualizes the present nuclear stalemate because the assembly of two kind of equal battle events, which actively mirrors nuclear hotspots of the Chilly Conflict such because the Cuban Missile Disaster. That is additionally mirrored within the frequent references to both the Chilly Conflict itself or the Cuban Missile Disaster and likening these to the present scenario. The strategic narrative Russia disseminates in regards to the worldwide system through RT is thus a story that conceptualizes a re-emergent Chilly Conflict system with a renewed nuclear face-off between NATO and Russia as superpowers.
Id Narrative: Russia as a Accountable Actor Desirous to Cease Nuclear Escalation
Two identification narratives are prominently featured all through the analyzed articles. Russia and NATO are conceptualized in distinction to one another, one because the accountable and one because the irresponsible battle celebration. The picture which Russia seeks to convey to overseas audiences through RT exhibits Russia in a wholly optimistic gentle. Russia is framed as a accountable actor with regard to nuclear questions that desires to restrict the proliferation of nuclear weapons and warns the United Nations when it suspects their unlawful manufacturing. Russia is framed as not partaking in nuclear rhetoric or brinkmanship, as following a transparent and affordable nuclear technique and condemning any (Western) efforts which could spur nuclear confrontation.
This contrasts with the image that Russia paints of NATO. NATO is framed as an irresponsible actor who, via its indiscriminate help for Kyiv, aggressive rhetoric, and threats of nuclear and territorial growth, bears the accountability for the nuclear tensions between the 2 sides. Subsequent to their accountability, NATO can be seen as extremely fragmented over nuclear and non-nuclear points: the US and Poland contradict one another, France is publicly scolded by the UK, and a battle between the UK and Belgium threatens to dismember NATO.
Framing NATO as aggressive, however on the similar time weakened because of inside disintegration, seemingly contradicts the elevated superpower standing that NATO is granted via Russia’s system narrative and shall be mentioned additional within the following part of this paper. Concludingly, Russia’s identification narrative in RT seeks to painting Russia as a accountable actor who desires to cease nuclear escalation pushed by a fragmented and aggressive West/NATO.
Concern Narrative: Russia Is Presently Going through Nuclear Threats from Ukraine and NATO
Concerning the difficulty at hand, particularly nuclear tensions over the conflict in Ukraine, Russia seeks to painting the scenario in a means that places the accountability for the tense scenario on each NATO and Ukraine. Associated to the identification narrative, Russia as a accountable actor isn’t liable for the scenario. Reasonably, NATO’s energetic territorial growth and the specter of stationing weapons in new NATO international locations in addition to their nuclear brinkmanship in rhetoric and motion is what spurred the battle. Ukraine, in distinction, is portrayed as partaking in nuclear blackmail or terrorism. Ukraine seeks to focus on related nuclear infrastructure, construct a grimy bomb, and finally acquire nuclear weapons for itself. By this, Ukraine is alleged of plotting NATO and Russia in opposition to one another by upsetting a nuclear confrontation between the superpowers. Lastly, Ukraine resorts to overt nuclear threats similar to asking NATO to conduct a primary strike on Russia. The strategic narrative, which Russia seeks to promulgate in regards to the problem of nuclear confrontation over the Ukraine conflict, is thus that Russia faces energetic nuclear threats from Ukraine in addition to NATO.
Dialogue
A thematic evaluation of 58 chosen RT articles has finally yielded three distinct strategic narratives disseminated by Russia. The primary strategic narrative recognized issues the scenario of the worldwide system. The worldwide system right here was conceptualized as a re-born Chilly Conflict system with a renewed nuclear face-off between two superpowers, the West/NATO and Russia. The second strategic narrative consists of two interrelated identification narratives which characterize Russia in opposition to the West/NATO. Right here, Russia is conceptualized as a accountable, actor who desires to cease nuclear escalation pushed by a fragmented and aggressive NATO/West. Lastly, the difficulty narrative surrounding nuclear tensions across the Ukraine battle conveys the idea that Russia is presently going through nuclear threats from Ukraine and NATO.
These three main findings present circumstances of interrelatedness. First, the system narrative during which Russia sees itself as a superpower is intently related to the identification narrative, which constructs Russia as such. The worldwide narrative, thus, rests on the identification narrative which should first set up Russia as a superpower, whereas the system narrative then takes up this characterization and makes use of it to assemble the worldwide system as a Chilly Conflict system between two superpowers.
Secondly, the three narratives additionally appear to battle in sure situations. By the system and problem narratives, the West/NATO is constructed as a threatening superpower that presents a severe risk to Russia. The identification narrative, whereas it agrees with the aggressive acts of the West/NATO, moreover finds a presumed inside division between NATO states. These two assertions appear to initially contradict themselves: How can Russia be threatened by a fragmented alliance? The next paragraphs will try and make clear the interconnectedness of the three narratives in addition to put them into the context of earlier analysis.
A number of themes and narratives that this analysis has recognized and described previously sections will also be present in earlier analysis. There’s a vital overlap within the findings of earlier Russian strategic narrative analyses, particularly with regard to the usage of RT to unfold these. Essentially the most prominently featured Russian strategic narrative which has repeatedly been recognized by researchers is an identification narrative that constructs Russia positively in opposition to an aggressive West/NATO. Extra exactly, Russia is characterised as righteous, peaceable, and ethical, whereas the West/NATO is characterised as hypocritical, aggressive, hegemonic, and hostile (see Szotek, 2017a; Ventsel et al., 2021; Hinck et al., 2018; Khaldarova, 2016). This analysis isn’t any exception with regard to the antithetic use of characterizations. The identification narrative recognized regarding the usage of nuclear weapons additionally exhibits Russia as a accountable and peaceable actor who makes energetic efforts to cease the anticipated nuclear escalation of the battle. The West/NATO, then again, is certainly characterised because the outstanding actor in pushing a nuclear agenda, partaking in nuclear brinkmanship, increasing territorially and with nuclear weapons, and appearing typically aggressively. Curiously, all earlier research in addition to this research discovered that Russia by no means characterizes itself as a optimistic actor with out additionally characterizing a destructive different (the US, NATO, the West). The optimistic traits which Russia claims for itself are at all times discovered solely in connection to the destructive traits of the West.
The present literature has discovered two pillars of Russia’s constructed self-identity: first, the positively connotated ethical traits, which Russia claims for itself, and second, a fantastic energy standing (Miskimmon et al., 2014; Szotek, 2017a; Hinck et al., 2018; Khaldarova, 2016). Russia understands itself as one of many world’s superpowers with a rising affect in world politics (Szotek, 2017a; Hinck et al. ,2018). This sense of equality to international locations or alliance programs such because the US and NATO can be mirrored within the system narrative this analysis has recognized. Whereas the identification narrative didn’t make direct makes an attempt at framing Russia as a world-leading superpower however slightly as a accountable actor in nuclear questions, the recognized system narrative conceptualizes a system during which Russia and the West/NATO face one another instantly. Russia isn’t portrayed as an underdog or considerably weaker than the West/NATO, however as assertive and powerful. Russia’s identification as a superpower thus instantly influences its understanding of the worldwide system and its function inside it.
Hinck et al. (2018) assessed strategic narratives in connection to the Crimean annexation and located that Russia conceptualized the battle because the West attempting to rob Russia of Ukraine. This perceived injustice was seen because the West/NATO understanding the immense Russian energy and affect and attempting to undermine it. This theme displays the difficulty narrative that this analysis recognized. Russia once more portrays itself as instantly threatened by the West/NATO within the context of nuclear tensions between the 2 powers. In keeping with this, Szotek (2017a) additionally identifies Russian strategic narratives which divert the blame of tensions between Russia and the West/NATO in direction of the West. Western expansionistic and aggressive conduct as causes for a declining relationship have thus been narratives constructed by the Russian authorities in previous Ukraine crises as properly.
This analysis has discovered that Russia seeks to painting NATO as an internally divided alliance. This can be a theme that previous analysis has equally recognized. Rhyzhova (2019) elaborates on Russia portraying the European Union as a disintegrating alliance with out prospects. Hansson et al. (2022) discover that Russia seeks to delegitimize the US and NATO by referring to their inside erosion of democracy. Miskimmon et al. (2014) put these defamation makes an attempt into context. These are a part of a wider perspective on worldwide developments during which Russia sees the West, and particularly the US, as shedding energy and solely enjoying a marginal function on the earth politics of the longer term, which shall be dominated by, for instance, the BRICS international locations, the place amongst them is Russia.
This additionally places the seeming contradiction between this analysis’s system and identification narratives into context. This part has already alluded to the query of why Russia portrays the West/NATO as an equal opponent and risk within the system narrative whereas characterizing it as a weakened and internally divided actor within the identification narrative. Miskimmon et al.’s (2014) evaluation of a declining West versus a rising Russia signifies that Russia sees the present tensions over Ukraine as an equalized place. The West, in its decline, meets Russia half-ways in its rise. This interpretation may resolve the seeming contradiction and clarify why Russia can see the West/NATO as a vital risk whereas on the similar time portraying a presumed, rising weak spot on this opponent.
One narrative which is harder to place into context with earlier analysis is the difficulty narrative this analysis has recognized. Publications assessing Russian strategic narratives across the conflict on Ukraine are nonetheless lacking. That is very true for the case of Ukraine as a nuclear risk to Russia which lacks relations to beforehand recognized strategic narratives. As this dialogue has already talked about, the characterization of the West as a risk has been a theme in earlier Russian strategic narrative analyses and thru the primary invasion of Ukraine as properly (Szotek, 2017b). Khaldarova (2016) additionally finds a characterization of Ukraine as a risk to Russia. Nonetheless, subsequent to those publications, the literature concerning the securitization of Ukraine in Russian strategic narratives is sparse and doesn’t permit for added insights at this level.
Finally, this dialogue should handle why Russia follows these recognized narratives. Whereas this constitutes a analysis query in itself and ought to be topic to additional analysis, the next part shall attempt to give a short overview of the Russian reasoning behind selecting these methods. The necessity for sure strategic narratives may be defined via RT’s viewers. Solely two research have scrutinized RT’s viewers and have reached contradicting outcomes. For one, Crilley et al. (2022) refuse to characterize RT’s viewers as a homogenous group of disillusioned Westerners who hunt down RT’s content material particularly. Carter and Carter (2021), nevertheless, discover that People who repeatedly devour RT content material are 10-20% extra prone to favor the US’s decline as a world superpower. Since these research solely type the beginnings of a physique of analysis, this paper will decide on the issue to evaluate the viewers which RT seeks out. Nonetheless, the US Division of State report on RT and Sputnik clearly states that RT doesn’t appear to interact in correct viewers evaluation both. The belief is just that RT reaches the West typically (US. DoS, GEC 2021). Subsequently, the lack of understanding about RT’s viewers doesn’t affect the significance which RT and the knowledge it emanates to its Western viewers has to the Kremlin.
This significance is mirrored in, for instance, the ever-growing investments Russia makes into RT (Ranwsley, 2015). The Kremlin’s strategy to worldwide broadcasting, nevertheless, does appear to gamble on the success of Carter and Carter’s (2021) findings. Rawnsley (2015) explains that the Russian management is generally involved with countering the American perspective within the West and giving an alternate clarification to world politics. The Russian management can be satisfied {that a} optimistic exterior notion of Russia equals rising political affect. Strategic narratives on RT are thus largely involved with making a counterfactual to the US means of reporting: Russia and the US change their roles as antagonists. The findings of this research will be seen as matching Rawnsley’s (2015) evaluation of the usage of Russian state media overseas. Russia seeks to convey a optimistic picture of itself with regard to the nuclear tensions over the Russia-Ukraine conflict: Russia seeks to de-escalate and act responsibly whereas the West is the true agitator behind the difficulty. Crucial process of RT is to counter Western mainstream reporting.
Conclusion
This paper has got down to reply what Russia’s strategic narrative concerning the nuclear tensions with NATO over the Ukraine battle as introduced in Russia As we speak are. By a thematic evaluation of 58 articles extracted from Russia As we speak, this paper finds that Russia’s strategic narrative concerning the nuclear tensions with NATO as introduced in RT is threefold: Russia sees the worldwide system as a renewed Chilly Conflict system during which two superpowers have a nuclear face-off; it conceptualizes itself as a accountable actor eager to keep away from nuclear conflict whereas NATO is seen as internally divided and pushing nuclear brinkmanship; and sees itself as going through nuclear threats from each Ukraine and NATO.
This paper provides to the physique of scholarly literature regarding Russian strategic narrative analyses typically but in addition offers essential insights right into a extremely present matter. The current analysis opens up a number of additional analysis questions which ought to be addressed sooner or later, e.g. in regards to the reception of strategic narratives in RT’s viewers and with particular regard to the continued battle in Ukraine.
References
Bacio Terracino, J., & Matasick, C. (2022, November 3). Disinformation and Russia’s conflict of aggression in opposition to Ukraine. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/ukraine-hub/policy- responses/disinformation-and-russia-s-war-of-aggression-against-ukraine-37186bde/
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Utilizing thematic evaluation in psychology. Qualitative Analysis in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bushue, A. (2015). Framing of Army Exercise within the Arctic on Russia As we speak. Uppsala Universitet. [Master Thesis]. Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:824449/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Carter, E. B., & Carter, B. L. (2021). Questioning extra: RT, outward-facing propaganda, and the post-west world order. Safety Research, 30(1), 49-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2021.1885730
Heart for Preventive Motion. (2022, Might 12). Battle in Ukraine. International Battle Tracker; Council on International Relations. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict- tracker/battle/conflict-ukraine
Claessen, E. (2021). The making of a story: The usage of geopolitical othering in Russian strategic narratives through the Ukraine disaster. Media, Conflict & Battle, 17506352211029529. DOI: 10.1177/17506352211029529
Council of the EU. (2022, March 2). EU imposes sanctions on state-owned shops RT/Russia As we speak and Sputnik’s broadcasting within the EU. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/03/02/eu-imposes- sanctions-on-state-owned-outlets-rt-russia-today-and-sputnik-s-broadcasting-in-the-eu/
Crilley, R., Gillespie, M., Vidgen, B., & Willis, A. (2022). Understanding RT’s audiences: Publicity not endorsement for Twitter followers of Russian state-sponsored media. The Worldwide Journal of Press/Politics, 27(1), DOI: 10.1177/1940161220980692
de Dreuzy, P., & Gilli, A. (2022, November 29). NATO Evaluate – Russia’s nuclear coercion in Ukraine. NATO Evaluate. https://www.nato.int/docu/overview/articles/2022/11/29/russias- nuclear-coercion-in-ukraine/index.html
Dixon, R. (2022, November 30). Russia postpones talks on New START pact, imperiling main nuclear accord. Washington Put up. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/11/30/russia-us-start-nuclear-treaty/
Dyner, A. M., Kacprzyk, A., Lorenz, W., & Terlikowski, M. (2018). №166: How Russian violations of the 1997 Founding Act affect NATO-Russia relations. PISM Coverage Papers. Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych (PISM). https://www.pism.pl/publications/No_166_How_Russian_Violations_of_the_1997_Founding_Act_Influence_NATO-Russia_Relations
Fossum, S., Collins, Ok., & LeBlanc, P. (2022, October 7). Biden affords stark “Armageddon” warning on the hazards of Putin’s nuclear threats | CNN Politics. CNN. https://version.cnn.com/2022/10/06/politics/armageddon-biden-putin-russia-nuclear- threats/index.html
Gilboa, E. (2008). Trying to find a idea of public diplomacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55-77. DOI: 10.1177/0002716207312142
Hansson, S., Madisson, M. L., & Ventsel, A. (2022). Discourses of blame in strategic narratives: The case of Russia’s 5G tales. European Safety, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2057188
Hinck, R. S., Kluver, R., & Cooley, S. (2018). Russia re-envisions the world: Strategic narratives in Russian broadcast and information media throughout 2015. Russian Journal of Communication, 10(1), 21-37.
Holbrooke, R. (2001, October 28). Get the Message Out. Washington Put up. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/2001/10/28/get-the-message- out/b298b3c9-45b8-45e2-9ec7-20503dd38802/
Isachenkov, V. (2022, August 30). Russia to Maintain Sweeping Joint Conflict Video games With China, India, Others. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2022/08/russia-to-hold-sweeping- joint-war-games-with-china-india-others/
Khaldarova, I. (2016). Strategic narratives of the Ukraine battle projected for home and worldwide audiences by Russian TV channels. Media and the Ukraine Disaster, 123-138. https://www.researchgate.web/profile/Irina-Grigor-2/publication/333566597_Strategic_narratives_of_the_Ukraine_conflict_projected_for_domestic_and_international_
audiences_by_Russian_TV_channels/hyperlinks/5cf4ff55a6fdcc84750092f5/Strategic-narratives-of-the-Ukraine-conflict-projected-for-domestic-and-international-audiences-by-Russian-TV-channels.pdf
Khaldarova, I., & Pantti, M. (2020). Faux information: The narrative battle over the Ukrainian battle. In The Way forward for Journalism: Dangers, Threats and Alternatives (pp. 228-238). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1163237
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic evaluation of qualitative knowledge: AMEE Information No. 131. Medical Trainer, 42(8), 846-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
Miskimmon, A., O’loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2014). Strategic narratives: Communication energy and the brand new world order. Routledge.
NATO. (1997). Founding Act on on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Safety between NATO and the Russian Federation signed in Paris, France. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_25468.htm
NATO. (2022, September 21). NATO-Russia: setting the file straight. NATO. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/115204.htm
Paul, C., & Matthews, M. (2016). The Russian “firehose of falsehood” propaganda mannequin. Rand Company, 2(7), 1-10. https://www.rand.org/content material/dam/rand/pubs/views/PE100/PE198/RAND_PE19 8.pdf.
Polityuk, P. (2022, September 24). Russia holds annexation votes; Ukraine says residents coerced. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-marches-farther- into-liberated-lands-separatist-calls-urgent-referendum-2022-09-19/
Pszczel, R. (2022, July 7). NATO Evaluate – The implications of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine for worldwide safety – NATO and past. NATO Evaluate. https://www.nato.int/docu/overview/articles/2022/07/07/the-consequences-of-russias- invasion-of-ukraine-for-international-security-nato-and-beyond/index.html
Rawnsley, G. D. (2015). To know us is to like us: Public diplomacy and worldwide broadcasting in modern Russia and China. Politics, 35(3-4), 273-286. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9256.12104
Reuters. (2022, November 30). Russia says it should deal with constructing nuclear arms infrastructure in 2023. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-says-it-will-focus- building-nuclear-arms-infrastructure-2023-2022-11-30/
Roselle, L., Miskimmon, A., & O’loughlin, B. (2014). Strategic narrative: A brand new means to know delicate energy. Media, Conflict & Battle, 7(1), 70-84. DOI: 10.1177/1750635213516696
Russia As we speak. (2022). About. Russia As we speak. https://www.rt.com/about-us/
Ryzhova, A. (2019). Strategic narratives and public diplomacy within the Russian information media portrayal of Sweden: case of Russia As we speak. [Bachelor Thesis]. College of Gothenburg. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/deal with/2077/61722/gupea_2077_61722_1.pdf?sequence=1
Schmitt, O. (2018). When are strategic narratives efficient? The shaping of political discourse via the interplay between political myths and strategic narratives. Modern Safety Coverage, 39(4), 487-511. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2018.1448925
Szostek, J. (2017a). Defence and promotion of desired state identification in Russia’s strategic narrative. Geopolitics, 22(3), 571-593. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1214910
Szostek, J. (2017b). The ability and limits of Russia’s strategic narrative in Ukraine: The function of linkage. Perspective on Politics, 15(2), 379-395. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700007X
U.S. DEPARTMENT of STATE. (2022, February). Kremlin-Funded Media: RT and Sputnik’s Position in Russia’s Disinformation and Propaganda Ecosystem. International Engagement Heart. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Kremlin- Funded-Media_January_update-19.pdf
Van Noort, C. (2017). Research of strategic narratives: The case of BRICS. Politics and Governance, 5(3), 121-129. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v5i3.961
Ventsel, A., Hansson, S., Madisson, M. L., & Sazonov, V. (2021). Discourse of concern in strategic narratives: The case of Russia’s Zapad conflict video games. Media, Conflict & Battle, 14(1), 21-39. DOI: 10.1177/1750635219856552
Wagnsson, C., & Lundström, M. (2022). Ringing true? The persuasiveness of Russian strategic narratives. Media, Conflict & Battle, 17506352221101273. DOI: 10.1177/00108367221110675
Yablokov, I. (2015). Conspiracy theories as a Russian public diplomacy software: The case of Russia As we speak (RT). Politics, 35(3-4), 301-315. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9256.12097
Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations
![Baggage Statistics [2024]: Shopper, Product & Development Information](https://totogossip.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/best-wheeled-luggage-75x75.jpg)
